我会一直看着你们的哦
👀15😱9custom 62739705438928972093❤1

Channel
@hansuxuehua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002351675618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hansuxuehua |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hansuxuehua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 26 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 27 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
198 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 25.8% | |
| 🥰 | 42 | 21.2% | |
| 👀 | 35 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 9.60% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 7.58% | |
| 😘 | 11 | 5.56% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 4.04% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 4.04% | |
| custom 6273970543892897209 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.52% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.505% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.505% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.505% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我会一直看着你们的哦
👀15😱9custom 62739705438928972093❤1
对不起
👀14😢3
好冷
🔥11👀3❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰10❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰12❤1
https://www.numdam.org/item/JMPA_1846_1_11__381_0.pdf
❤1
第 417–433 页:《关于方程代数解法条件的论文》 Mémoire sur les conditions de résolubilité des équations par radicaux 这是整部著作中最关键的部分。 在这里,伽罗瓦完成了一次根本性的转变: 在此之前,数学的核心问题是“如何计算”; 在此之后,数学开始关注“结构与对称”。 他提出:如果一个方程的根之间可以通过某种方式互相交换,而某些关系保持不变, 那么这些“交换”本身构成了一个整体结构。 后来,这种结构被称为: 群(Group) 他进一步证明:一个方程是否能够用根式解, 取决于这个“群”是否可以被逐层分解为更简单的结构(即后来所谓的“可解群”)。 这意味着——五次方程之所以在一般情况下无解,并不是因为我们不够聪明,而是因为它的内在结构本身就不允许这样的表达存在。 第 434-444 页:第二篇论文片段(本原方程) 这部分虽然残缺不全,但它展示了…
❤1
这 65 页纸,成为现代代数学真正意义上的起点。 第 381 页:前言 刘维尔在开篇郑重地向读者说明:这个少年不是疯子,而是天才。他承认伽罗瓦的叙述非常精简,但其中的逻辑无坚不摧。 这不是一篇普通论文,而是一种尚未被时代准备好的思想。 第 408 页:绝笔信 这是整部手稿的灵魂。 在写给好友舍瓦利耶(Auguste Chevalier)的信中,伽罗瓦并未展开繁复计算,而是试图概括自己全部工作的核心结构。 他已经不再执着于“如何求解方程”, 而是转向一个更深的问题:解之间,如何彼此关联? 他讨论“多值性”“周期”“函数之间的结构关系”,甚至对后来晚二十年才出现的黎曼曲面理论给出了令人震惊的预见。 信的末尾,他写道: “请请求雅可比或高斯给出意见,不是关于这些定理的正确性,而是它们的重要性。” 可惜,高斯从未读到这封信,而雅可比看到它时已是多年以后。最终,是刘维尔在1846年完成了这次跨越生死的接力。 第 416–41…
❤1
1832 年 5 月 29 日深夜,在决斗前的最后时刻,20 岁的埃瓦里斯特·伽罗瓦(Évariste Galois)正对着一盏将熄的灯疯狂书写。 窗外是决斗前夕的死寂,窗内是他留给人类文明的最后自白。 在手稿边缘,他匆匆写下那句后来震动数学史的话: “我没有时间了”(Je n’ai pas le temps) 次日清晨,他在决斗中中弹,伤重不治。 这位天才离世时年仅 20 岁,留下的只是一些被当时学界视为“晦涩”“潦草”的手稿。 ——没有人意识到,那是一整套尚未被理解的世界。 伽罗瓦去世后,他的思想沉寂了整整 14 年。 当时数学界的巨擘泊松、柯西无一能看透这些潦草符号背后的逻辑。 直到 1846 年,约瑟夫·刘维尔(Joseph Liouville)接过了这叠尘封的遗稿。 他没有像前人那样轻易否定,而是花费数年时间,逐行推演、补全、重建逻辑。 最终他意识到:这绝非混乱的草稿,而是一种前所未有的数学语言。 于是,在 …
❤1
网易云我杀nidema
😢5❤1🤬1
我喜欢的大家都在好好生活吗
🥰13❤3🎉2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hansuxuehua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“寒处是否有人烟” (@hansuxuehua), 26 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hansuxuehua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.