Channel
@hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001054467664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 45 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 41 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 40 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 September 2017 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2017. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️ جناب آقای بهشتی با نهایت تاسف و تاثر درگذشت پدر گرامیتان را تسلیت عرض نموده، برای آن شادروان علو درجات و برای شما و سایر بازماندگان صبر و اجر مسئلت می نماییم. @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan
انسانیت هنوز زنده است #با_حیوانات_مهربان_باشیم
─═इई 🍃🌸🍃ईइ═─ به نام خدای حیوانات🦋 مصریان باستان حدود 3700 سال پیش ، اولین کسانی بودند که اقدام به اهلی کردن یوز پلنگ کردند . پس از آن این رفتار در کشورهای آسیایی که زیستگاه این حیوان زیبا بود ، نیز فراگیر شد . یوز پلنگهای نگون بخت زنده گیری میشدند و پیشکش پادشاهان میشدند و در شکار از آنها استفاده میشد . یوز ایرانی هم ، به جرم زندگی در طبیعت ایران زمین از این رفتار به دور نبود ؛ شکارچیان پادشاهان ایرانی هم یوز پلنگ…
⚫️♻️لطفا این پیام را در تمام گروه ها و برای تمام دوستان و خانواده خود ارسال فرمایید. @talayehdaranzagros @balutbananzagros @mohitzistedoroud @karbalapak @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan
حمایت از حیوانات بد سرپرست و بی سرپرست درود و بروجرد @Hamiandorodborojerd
به پویش ملی مسیر پاک تا کربلا♻⚫ بپیوندید. عکس های مربوط به پاکسازی مسیر زائرین کربلا را به اشتراک گذارید.. https://t.me/karbalapak
قتل عام و تشکیل جوخه اعدام اسب ها توسط نیروهای مرزبانی ایران جهت ممانعت از ورود و خروج کالای قاچاق ... ایا راه بهتری برای ممناعت از این کار نبود؟! @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan
صبحتون بخیر و شادکامی تغییر را از خود شروع کنیم #الگو_باشیم #سخاوتمند_باشیم #عشق_بورزیم @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan
#دیرین_دیرین_سگ_کشی @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan
#هیرو کیس حمایتی انجمن حامیان حیوانات حامی: جناب کردعلیوند @hamuaneheyvanat_lorestan
حیوون خونگی فقط حیوون خونگی این هموطن 👀😐😐😐😐😐👀 @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan
❇️ لرستان - خرم آباد حمایت از حیوانات لرستان https://www.instagram.com/hemayat_az_heyvanat_lorstan/ کانال خرم آباد ادمین ها: @Kayout, @khashayarsaki, @Ehsanww, @FatemehOmran62 https://t.me/hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan غرب کشور - خرم آباد و بروجرد و ... ادمین: @khashayarsaki https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEGrEycwAJgc25fR9A ❇️ ❇️ ❇️ ❇️ ❇️ ❇️ ❇️ https://t.me/linkdooni_hamian_heyvanat_iran
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال حامیان حیوانات” (@hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan), 45 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hamyaneheyvanat_lorestan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.