Channel
@hamsoya_uz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001561057956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hamsoya_uz |
| Description | Bogʻlanish: @bannayevbot Psixologlar uchun: @psixologik_treninglar kanali |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hamsoya_uz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 66 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 66 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 April 2023 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 299 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
41 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 68.3% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 19.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 9.76% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2023 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌅 Nega ba'zi jamoalarda odamlar bemalol fikr bildiradi? Bir yig‘ilishda ikki xil muhitni tasavvur qiling. Birinchi jamoada odamlar xato qilishdan qo‘rqadi, savol berishga uyaladi va fikrini yashiradi. Ikkinchi jamoada esa har kim o‘z fikrini erkin ayta oladi, xato qilsa ham kamsitilishidan qo‘rqmaydi. Psixologiyada bu psixologik xavfsizlik deb ataladi. Ilmiy tadqiqotlar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, psixologik xavfsizlik yuq…
🌙 Birgina jumla insonning o‘ziga bo‘lgan ishonchini oshirishi mumkin Ba'zan biz yaxshi niyatda quyidagicha deymiz: ❌ "Buni ham bilmaysizmi?" Yoki: ❌ "Bu juda oson-ku!" Aslida esa bunday iboralar suhbatdoshning o‘zini noqulay his qilishiga sabab bo‘lishi mumkin. Psixologik xavfsizlikni yaratish uchun baholovchi emas, qo‘llab-quvvatlovchi til muhim. Masalan: ✅ "Bu qiziqarli savol." ✅ "Keling, birgalikda ko‘rib chiqam…
Kechqurungi fikrlar nega kuchliroq tuyuladi? Kechasi yotganingizda oddiy muammo ham juda katta bo‘lib ko‘ringan paytlar bo‘lganmi? Psixologlarning kuzatishicha, charchoq kuchayganda miya salbiy fikrlarni ko‘proq aylantirib ko‘rishga moyil bo‘ladi. Kun davomida band bo‘lgan e'tibor kechqurun bo‘shaydi va xavotirli fikrlar faolroq sezilishi mumkin. Shuning uchun kechasi qabul qilingan qarorlar har doim ham eng oqilo…
👍1
Empatiya – boshqani tushunish san'ati Ko‘pincha biz suhbat davomida tushunish uchun emas, javob qaytarish uchun tinglaymiz. Psixologiyada empatiya — bu boshqaning hissiyotlarini o‘z nuqtai nazaridan tushunishga harakat qilish qobiliyati hisoblanadi. Empatiya hamdardlikdan farq qiladi. Hamdardlikda biz achinishimiz mumkin, empatiyada esa insonning ichki holatini tushunishga intilamiz. Tadqiqotlar shuni ko‘rsatadiki…
👍1
Nega miyamiz noma'lumlikdan qo‘rqadi? Muhim suhbat oldidan, yangi ish boshlashdan yoki natijasini bilmaydigan vaziyatga duch kelganingizda yuragingiz tez urganini sezganmisiz? Bu tabiiy holat. Psixologlarning ta'kidlashicha, miya aniqlikni yaxshi ko‘radi. Noma'lum vaziyatlarda esa u ehtimoliy xavflarni oldindan tasavvur qilishga harakat qiladi. Shu sababli ba'zan hali sodir bo‘lmagan voqealar haqida ham ortiqcha x…
👍1
Har bir insonning ko‘rinmaydigan kurashi bor Ko‘chada, ishxonada yoki oilada uchraydigan har bir inson o‘ziga xos hayotiy sinovlarni boshdan kechirayotgan bo‘lishi mumkin. Shuning uchun ba'zan qo‘pol tuyulgan muomala ortida: charchoq; xavotir; yo‘qotish; ruhiy bosim yashiringan bo‘lishi ehtimoldan xoli emas. Bu har qanday xatti-harakatni oqlaydi degani emas. Ammo vaziyatni tushunishga harakat qilish bizni shoshma-…
👍1
Nega miyamiz odatlarni yaxshi ko‘radi? Har kuni ertalab tish yuvish yoki eshikni qulflash haqida deyarli o‘ylamaymiz. Sababi bu harakatlar odatga aylangan. Psixologlarning ta'kidlashicha, odatlar miyaga energiyani tejashga yordam beradi. Takrorlanadigan ishlar avtomatik bajarilgani uchun miya muhim qarorlarga ko‘proq resurs ajrata oladi. Shu sababli yaxshi odatlar insonning muvaffaqiyatini faqat motivatsiyadan ko‘ra …
👍1
Minnatdorchilik bildirish munosabatlarni qanday mustahkamlaydi? Har kuni "rahmat" deymiz. Ammo uni chin dildan va aniq sabab bilan aytishning psixologik ta'siri haqida o‘ylab ko‘rganmisiz? Psixologik tadqiqotlar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, samimiy minnatdorchilik: o‘zaro ishonchni kuchaytiradi; ijobiy hissiyotlarni oshiradi; munosabatlardan qoniqishni yaxshilaydi. Muhimi, minnatdorchilik umumiy emas, aniq bo‘lsa, uning ta'si…
👍1
Har kuni 1% yaxshilanishning kuchi Ko‘pchiligimiz katta natijalarni kutamiz. Ammo psixologiyada shaxsiy rivojlanish ko‘pincha kichik, ammo izchil o‘zgarishlar orqali sodir bo‘lishi ta'kidlanadi. Tasavvur qiling, siz har kuni atigi 1% yaxshilanib borsangiz. Bir kunda bu deyarli sezilmaydi. Bir oy o‘tgach esa farq yaqqol ko‘rina boshlaydi. Muvaffaqiyat ko‘pincha bitta katta qadam emas, yuzlab kichik qadamlarning y…
Har doim javob berish shart emas Bahs paytida darhol javob qaytarish istagi paydo bo‘lishi tabiiy. Ammo hissiyot kuchli bo‘lgan lahzalarda aytilgan so‘zlar keyinchalik afsus uyg‘otishi mumkin. Psixologiyada javob berish va reaksiya qilish o‘rtasida farq bor. Reaksiya — hissiyot ta'sirida, o‘ylamasdan javob berish. Javob — vaziyatni baholab, ongli ravishda harakat qilish. Ba'zan bir necha soniyalik sukut eng dono ja…
Kichik g‘alabalar nega muhim? Ko‘pchilik faqat katta yutuqlarni muvaffaqiyat deb hisoblaydi. Ammo psixologik tadqiqotlar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, kichik yutuqlarni tan olish motivatsiyani oshiradi va maqsad sari izchil harakat qilishga yordam beradi. Masalan: ✅ Bugun 10 sahifa kitob o‘qidim. ✅ 15 daqiqa sport bilan shug‘ullandim. ✅ Bir qiyin vazifani nihoyasiga yetkazdim. Bu mayda qadamlar miyaga "Men oldinga siljiyapma…
Diqqatni boshqarish — zamonaviy davrning eng muhim ko‘nikmalaridan biri Bir necha daqiqaga telefoningizni tekshirish uchun oldingiz. Oradan 20 daqiqa o‘tib ketganini sezmay qoldingizmi? Bu tasodif emas. Psixologik tadqiqotlar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, miyamiz yangi va qiziqarli ma'lumotlarga tez javob qaytarishga moyil. Har bir bildirishnoma, yangi xabar yoki video diqqatimizni o‘ziga tortadi. Natijada ishimiz tez-tez bo‘…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hamsoya_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 841,791 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hamsoya - Siz bilan birga” (@hamsoya_uz), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hamsoya_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.