⚖️ همکاری پزشکان با مراکز درمانگاهی فقط به ساعت حضور و مبلغ پرداختی محدود نمیشود؛ نوع قرارداد، بیمه، تعهدات شغلی و نحوه پایان همکاری نیز میتواند زمینهساز ابهام یا اختلاف باشد. 🩺 انجمن پزشکان عمومی استان یزد با همراهی همراکار برگزار میکند: وبینار آموزشی رایگان «قوانین کار برای پزشکان» در این وبینار، مهمترین نکات قانون کار مرتبط با پزشکان، حقوق و الزامات شغلی در مراکز درمانگاهی و راهکارهای داشتن یک همکاری حرفهای …

Channel
HAMRAKAR
@hamrakar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
271subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002002066754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hamrakar |
| Description | 💡 | آکادمی تخصصی منابع انسانی همراکار "همراکار؛ همراهی مطمئن برای توسعه سرمایه انسانی" 🔸 آموزش و توسعه نیروی انسانی 🔸 جذب، استخدام و ارزیابی عملکرد 🔸 طراحی سیستمهای منابع انسانی 🔸 حل اختلافات و پشتیبانی حقوقی #همراکار پشتیبانی: @hamrakarr |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hamrakar |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 271 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 271 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 267 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 104.8%
- avg views ÷ 271 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 284
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 May 2025 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,555 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 46
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 61.5% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 38.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
دیشب داشتم توی «بلد» آدرس یکی از شرکتهای معروف و نامآشنای شهر رو چک میکردم که چشمم افتاد به نظرات کاربران. برام جالب بود که آدمها حتی توی نقشهها هم از تجربههای کاریشون مینویسن. بین کامنتها، یک نظر مربوط به دو سال پیش بدجور توجهم رو گرفت؛ نوشته بود کیفیت محصولات عالیه، اما جو بعضی بخشها برای خانمها مسموم و ناامنه. 📍⚠️ طبیعتاً با یک کامنت قدیمی نمیشه درباره کل یک مجموعه قضاوت کرد. اما وقتی کمی بیشتر پیگیری…
👍3❤2
خیلی وقتها هدف مشخص است، همه هم مشغول کارند؛ اما آخر ماه معلوم نیست دقیقاً چه چیزی بهتر شده و کجا هنوز مشکل داریم. در دوره ۱۶ ساعته طراحی و استقرار نظام مدیریت عملکرد یاد میگیرید چطور هدف و شاخص درست تعریف کنید، عملکرد را در طول مسیر بسنجید، بازخورد بدهید و برای بهبود نتیجه برنامه داشته باشید. این دوره برای هر کسی مناسب است که مسئول نتیجه گرفتن از یک تیم، واحد یا کسبوکار است. 👤 مدرس: جلال نیکپیمان 📅 ۵ و ۶ شهری…
🟥 مشکل، کمکاری شما یا تیمتان نیست؛ مشکل این است که هدفها به نتیجه قابلاندازهگیری تبدیل نمیشوند. در کارگاه عملی طراحی و اجرای OKR، روی یکی از اهداف واقعی مجموعه خودتان کار میکنید؛ آن را به یک Objective شفاف و Key Resultهای قابلاندازهگیری تبدیل میکنید و چارچوب پیگیری آن را با خودتان میبرید. 💼 مناسب برای مدیران عامل، صاحبان کسبوکار، مدیران و کارشناسانی که مسئول تحقق اهداف سازماناند. 💡 خروجی کارگاه: تدوین…
🤖 هوش مصنوعی قراره همکارمون باشه، نه جایگزینمون! در این جزوه کاربردی، مجموعهای از پرامپتها و راهکارهای عملی هوش مصنوعی برای منابع انسانی آماده کردیم؛ از جذب و استخدام و آموزش گرفته تا ارزیابی عملکرد، تحلیل داده و کار با اکسل. 📊 مطالب جزوه ساده، کاربردی و قابل استفاده در کارهای روزمره منابع انسانی نوشته شده تا بتوانید سریعتر و حرفهایتر کار کنید. 📥 فایل را دانلود و ذخیره کنید. 📤 برای همکاران منابع انسانیتان هم…
👍1
#پادکست_ترس
🎙 پادکست همراکار | اپیزود «ترس» آیا ممکن است یکی از بهترین کارکنان یک سازمان، بهخاطر ترس از اخراج، گزارش را دستکاری کند، اطلاعاتی را پنهان کند یا برای منفعت شرکت دروغ بگوید؟ در این اپیزود درباره رابطه میان ناامنی شغلی، رفتارهای غیراخلاقی و هویت اخلاقی کارکنان صحبت کردهایم؛ موضوعی که هم مدیران و هم کارکنان باید آن را جدی بگیرند. 🎧 پیشنهاد میکنیم این اپیزود را تا پایان گوش کنید؛ مخصوصاً اگر مدیر، سرپرست یا فعال ح…
👍2
🟨 استرس مصاحبه؛ مشکل خیلی از کارجوهاست، اما فقط مشکل کارجو نیست! خیلی از افراد را دیدم که رزومه خوب و تجربه کافی داشتند، اما فقط به خاطر استرس جلسه مصاحبه نتونستن توانایی واقعی خودشون رو نشون بدن. اینجا نقش مدیر و کارشناس منابع انسانی خیلی مهمه؛ مصاحبه نباید تبدیل به یک جلسه پرسش و پاسخ خشک بشه که فرد فقط دنبال جواب درست بگرده. یک مصاحبه حرفهای یعنی: ✅ سؤال درست پرسیده بشه ✅ به فرد فرصت فکر کردن داده بشه ✅ تجربه …
🦺 گزارش برگزاری کارگاههای آموزشی ایمنی در تاریخ ۲۵ و ۲۶ تیرماه ۱۴۰۵، دو کارگاه تخصصی ایمنی در کار با جرثقیل و ایمنی در برق با حضور ارزشمند شرکتکنندگان و همراهی استاد محترم دوره برگزار شد. در این کارگاهها تلاش شد با ارائه مباحث کاربردی و بررسی چالشهای واقعی محیط کار، گامی مؤثر در مسیر ارتقای دانش و فرهنگ ایمنی برداشته شود. 🌱 از استاد محترم دوره بابت انتقال دانش و تجربیات ارزشمند و از تمامی شرکتکنندگان عزیز باب…
🎭 سه شخصیت اصلی «همراکار» وارد شدند! ❌ اسمشون رو لو ندادیم؛ خودت باید حدس بزنی! اگه فکر میکنی میدونی اسم این سه نفر چیه، توی کامنت برام بنویس! 🎁 به ۳ نفر از برندهها هدیه ویژه میرسه! 📌 قوانین: ✔️ فالو کن 🚀 ✔️ اسم سه نفر رو بنویس ✔️ به اشتراک بذار خب، اسمشون چیه؟! 👇 آدرس صفحه اینستاگرام: @hamrakarr
❤1👍1
ما به توانِ انسانها باور داریم.🥰 به زودی... #همراکار
قدردانی فقط «لوح تقدیر» نیست! 🏅❌ در مدیریت منابع انسانی مدرن، پاداش غیرمالی ۳ لایه دارد: ۱. قدردانی اجتماعی: تشکر در جمع یا پیام عمومی. 🗣️🙌 ۲. قدردانی تخصصی: سپردن پروژههای مهمتر (نشاندهنده اعتماد). 📂⭐ ۳. نمادهای کوچک: یک یادداشت دستنویس یا یک فنجان قهوه با مدیر. ☕✍️ نکته علمی: پاداش غیرمالی به مغز سیگنال «ارزشمندی» میدهد که اثرش طولانیتر از پاداش نقدی است. 🧠✨ #انگیزش #پاداش_غیرمالی #مدیریت_تیم #همراکار …
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hamrakar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 43,775 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hamrakar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HAMRAKAR” (@hamrakar), 271 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hamrakar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.