2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 695–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 08:22
696
no change
25 Sept 2026, 07:47
696
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.1%
avg views ÷ 696 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
19 (27 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
3,264
Reactions total
138
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,140
Videos
≈1,120
Links
≈3,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
55
39.9%
🏆
19
13.8%
❤
17
12.3%
😭
15
10.9%
🤣
8
5.80%
❤🔥
5
3.62%
👏
5
3.62%
🔥
5
3.62%
👍
4
2.90%
💔
2
1.45%
👌
1
0.725%
🕊
1
0.725%
🫡
1
0.725%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قصيدة رافضية إيرانية مترجمة 🌟
ننشد مع آل النبي، مع عبد العظيم وحمزة وجعفر
اللعن على عائشة لحظةً بعد لحظة
تلك التي لأهل جهنم أمّ
من هي تلك المرأة التي أصبحت كعمر؟
اللعن على عائشة
ركبت الجمل وأصبحت مثيرةً للفتنة
اللعن على عائشة
صارت عشيقة طلحة عديم الأب
اللعن على عائشة
ما دام النفس في صدري، فأنا أبغض عائشة،وألعنها عندما أكون مريضًا ومبتلى
بنية تعجيل أمر فرج المهدي
أجعل ختم لعن عائشة على شفتيّ
اللعن على عدوّكِ ي…
🖋️ | جديد إجابات موقع القطرة
ما رأي الشيخ بإقامة بعض الشعائر في ذكرى شهادة سعيد بن جبير؟
https://al-qatrah.net/an4161
ما رأي الشيخ في كتاب «كشف الارتياب في أتباع محمد بن عبد الوهاب» لمحسن العاملي؟ وهل هناك كتب أخرى تنصحون بها؟
https://al-qatrah.net/an4162
ما رأي الشيخ الحبيب بالشيخ محمد حيدر العاملي؟
https://al-qatrah.net/an4163
ما رأي الشيخ بكتاب رياض القدس وبكتاب سفينة بحر المصائب؟
https://al-qatrah.net/an4…
سُئلت السيئة عائشة لعنها الله ذات مرة عن علامات ابناء العاهرة، فقالت:
«يضعون أضحكني على المنشورات الشيعية التي لا تستدعي الضحك ولا السخرية، وبهذا يُعرَف أبنائي»
المصدر: كتاب الرواية الساخرة لقصف ابن عائشة العاهرة، المجلد الثالث، باب «علامات ابن عائشة»، صـ 726036.
مطبعة كاشان دار تأديب أبناء الحمل المستكن.😏😁
هيچ احسلك 😂
ساءنا هذا الخبر في الشيخ الأسدي الكريم.
أسأل الله بحق محمد وآله الطاهرين أن يمنَّ عليه بتمام الصحة والعافية بحق الحسين عليه السلام، وهو بأبي وأمي لا يُخيبُ الشيخ الكريم حشاه، فإني ذات مرة قرأتُ تعليقا للشيخ الأسدي مضمونه أنه يستحيل أن يتحول أو ينتقل عن كربلاء المقدسة لأي بقعة من الأرض مهما كان المقابل الدنيوي، وأنه لا شيء عنده يعدل النظر كل يوم إلى القبة الشريفة للمولى الحسين عليه السلام.
دعاءنا للشيخ الكريم دائم بإذ…
كان سعود الرفيدي يريد أن يعبر عن مدى مودته بتقديم هدية تمثل قيمة معنوية هي الأغلى عند الرجال فاختار أن يقدم (سلاحه) كعانية..
(فلاحظوا) كيف جزع من ذلك ابن عمه الشاعر علي الحمري القحطاني ورفض الهدية بضرس قاطع:
ما حنا بسالبينك سلاحك، ما جبناك نسلبك سلاحك، أنت محزمي، خلها في حَقْوِك(أي خاصرتك) وانت أخوي!
بل حلف على نفسه بالطلاق كناية عن تشديده على رفض سلاحِ أخيه كهدية فقال: اللي في جيبك(يقصد المال) مقبول، أما سلاحك عَليّ…
بينما حزب الله بالفعل في وسط غابة تكتنفها الوحوش من كل الجهات! جيش من الخونة له سابقة في الانقسامات والاقتتال على أسس طائفية ما أدى إلى انهياره وانهيار مؤسسات ما يسمى الدولة اللبنانية، ومن جهة أخرى عدو صهيوني يبيع ويشتري خونة الداخل اللبناني كيف يشاء.
فبقي الحل الأسلم والخيار الوحيد لحزب الله هو الاحتفاظ بسلاحه.
نعم لو كانت هناك جهة مرجعية عادلة تقبل وتتحمل عبء ومسؤولية استقبال وحفظ سلاح حزب الله وتَسلُّمه فنِعم الم…
إنه يهوِّل من حوادث لا تخلو منها أجهزة (دُوَلٍ) بأكملها!
حتى في أكثر الدول قوة توجد مِن بعض عناصر الأمن والوزارات والأفراد انتهاكات لقوانين الدولة نفسها، بعضها يُفضح والآخر يبقى طيَّ الأدراج، فهل من عاقل يدعو إلى دفن سلاح الدولة او تسليمه للآخرين بحجج كهذه؟!
هذا كلام يقوله عاقل؟!
هذا يا فوعاني يقوله مخبول مثلك قد قَبَرَ صوتَ العقل والشرع معًا لمصلحة مشاريع صهيونية!
هذا الدعموص يعبر عن إيران بقوله جهات خارجية!
إيران …
❌إلى فوعاني المتصهين الوزغاني..
❌صاحب ماخور السفهاء الأقذار..
💥مادة المقال:
🌑تصدَّر هذا العنوان مقالة للمتمشيخ المدعو الفوعاني.
*بيان صادر عن رئيس هيئة العلماء الأحرار العالمية*
*سماحة العلّامة الشيخ محمد علي الفوعاني (دامت توفيقاته)*
https://www.facebook.com/100010771331671/posts/2491537397881947/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
💥مناقشة ما قاءه المتمشيخ المتصهين في بيانه الصهيوني..
1️⃣استهلّ السفيه باسم الله تعالى …
💯5👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hameraljouhaishy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فضائح الكذاب القريدي المدعو أمير القريشي لعنه الله” (@hameraljouhaishy), 696 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hameraljouhaishy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.