Channel
@halatwha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,090subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001045265454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @halatwha |
| Created | Between 1 February 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/halatwha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 1,090 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 1,091 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:10 | 1,092 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 1,093 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 1,093 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41k @scribe2 حالآت وآتس جديدة 65k @subscribe فكري شارد 9k @shaa3r_alhyah حياة @F666K2 لكل عاشق 7k @tsk3tBc قناة تسكعات فكرية @Beautysantar لك سيدتي @hearthoughts من القلب @Raqt_lee راقت لي @abtsamtk نكت 2k @MemoriesPrincesses ذكرى @SoftPlus2 إبداع سوفت @likedit حكاية روح 2k @Annhhg2018 رمزيات @khwatrD خواطر بنت @Q1M1Q قوة المعرفة @N_LOVE_E رمزيات @M_L_W مضحكة 1k @Sttorys قصص وخواطر @gjggfhj يخصك سيدتي @ittihad_F…
ارغب بأحدٍا يتحدث معي .. 📩 @reeev
#التحليل_الفني لـ أسهم #داوو_جونز بدأ سعر المؤشر بتشكيل تداولات تصحيحية هابطة متأثرا بثبات الحاجز الإضافي المستقر عند 32760 لنلاحظ تسجيله لبعض الأهداف بملامسته لمستوى 32235, محاولة تسلل مؤشر ستوكاستيك نحو مستوى تشبع البيع سيزيد بدوره من الضغوط السلبية ليسهل مهمة كسر السعر لمستوى تصحيح 38.2% فيبوناتشي والمستقر عند 32100 ومن ثم لننتظر تحقيقه لأهداف جديدة قد تمتد نحو 31780. نطاق التداول المتوقع ما بين 32500 و 31780 …
#التحليل_الفني لـ #النفط يستأنف سعر النفط تداولاته السلبية ليضغط على مستوى 64.55 الآن، مما يدعم استمرار توقعاتنا للاتجاه الهابط لهذا اليوم، تحفّزه إشارة التقاطع السلبي التي يقدّمها مؤشر ستوكاستيك الآن، بانتظار التوجه نحو أهدافنا التي تبدأ عند 63.55 وتمتد إلى 62.50، مع التذكير بأهمية الثبات دون 65.80 لتحقيق الأهداف المقترحة. نطاق التداول المتوقع لهذا اليوم ما بين الدعم 63.30 والمقاومة 66.00 الميل العام المتوقع لهذا…
سعر #اونصة_الفضة / 26.755 $ / . #silver #legend_brokers
#التحليل_الفني لـ #البتكوين تداولات تميل إلى السلبية تسيطر على تحركات البتكوين على الفواصل الزمنية القصيرة بعد أن وجد مستوى مقاومة قوية حول 49300. فنياً نحن نميل إلى السلبية معتمدين على ثبات التداول دون المقاومة المذكور، علاوة على سلبية مؤشر ستوكاستيك. تأكيد كسر 48410 يفتح الطريق لزيارة 48160 محطة أولية. من الأعلى اختراق 49310 يقود البتكوين لتحقيق مكاسب تبدأ أهدافها حول 49610. تحذير: المخاطر مرتفعة ولا تتناسب مع…
سعر #النفط_الخام ( #برنت ) / 62.75 / $. #oil #legend_brokers
تحليل سعر #البيتكوين اليوم: العملة المشفرة البيتكوين تتداول في اتجاه صاعد قيد التكوين على الفاصل الزمني ساعة يضعف هذا الاتجاه فشل اختراق مقاومة 50 ألف $ وأيضا فشل اختراق قمة أمس. من خلال تحليل السلوك السعري نلاحظ حدوث حالة من الضعف فيمكن ملاحظة تداول البيتكوين من خلال نطاق محدد بين مستويات 49504$ وحتى 48281$. مؤشر ماكد بالإعدادات العادية اشارته صاعدة يضعفها وجود انحراف فني سلبي قيد التكوين من الدرجة الأولى. …
سعر برميل #النفط الخام #برنت ( 63.27 ). #legend_brokers
الفرصة الأفضل لمستقبل أفضل #legend_brokers #سجل_الان www.legend-brokers.com
سعر #أونصة_الفضة . #legend_brokers
سعر #اونصة_الذهب الان #legend_brokers
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @halatwha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 370,155 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@halatwha named 21 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Legend Brokers” (@halatwha), 1,090 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/halatwha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.