Channel
@hadex7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,292subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001475801713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hadex7 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hadex7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 2,292 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 2,291 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 2,288 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 2,287 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 2,287 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,917 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
"شيوع ظاهرة المهتمين بطلب العلم مع رقَّة الديانة وخفوت المروءة وتدني الأخلاق، نذير شؤم، وقد قال قديما محب الدين الخطيب: (العلم بلا تربية شرٌ يستعاذ بالله منه)، وقال البشير الإبراهيمي: (العلم الخالي من التربية ضرره أكثر من نفعه...وكم شقي أصحاب العلم المجرد بالعلم وأشقوا أممهم)".
Sticker, posted without a caption
وبهذا يتبين أن بقاء العلم ببقاء أهله وهم العلماء، لا الكتب وأن الكتب وغيرها لا تغني شيئا بلا وجود العلماء. والله المستعان..
كيف يحصل رفع العلم في آخر الزمان؟ قال ابن حجر رحمه الله في شرح الحديث السابق: "والمراد برفعه: موت حملته".
من أشراط الساعة: رفع العلم قال الإمام البخاري في صحيحه: "باب رفع العلم وظهور الجهل وقال ربيعة: (لا ينبغي لأحدٍ عنده شيء من العلم أن يضيّع نفسه)" ثم ذكر حديثا عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أنه قال: (إنَّ من أشراط الساعة أن يُرفع العلم، ويثبت الجهل، ويشرب الخمر، ويظهر الزنا) قال ابن حجر: "ومراد ربيعة أن من كان فيه فهم وقابلية للعلم لا ينبغي له أن يهمل نفسه فيترك الاشتغال، لئلا يؤدي ذلك إلى رفع العلم". فتح البار…
"من ظن أن الجالسين في حلق العلم لا ينصرون الإسلام: فقد أُتِي من جهله، فإنه لا أحد ينصر الإسلامَ كأهل العلم وطلّابه.فحفظ الدين لا يكون إلا بالعلم؛ فإن الخطب النارية والبكاء على الأطلال لا تبني دينًا، ولا تحفظ شرعًا، ولا تُبقي ذكرًا، وإنما بقاء المسلمين هو في بث العلم وإحيائه" الشيخ صالح العصيمي
قال الحسن: "ما تصدّق امرئٌ مسلم أفضل من نشر العلم". الأمالي لابن منده
قال محمد بن سيرين: التّثبّتُ نصف العلم. الكفاية للخطيب
"في العادة .. يكون أقوى من ساهم في بناء عقلك هو أكثر من تكتشف أوهامه؛ وذلك لكثرة ما طالعت من نتاجه، فلا تكافئ إفاداته الكثيرة بإذاعة أوهامه!" د.سليمان العبودي
أقرب الناس إلى درجة النبوّة عن إسحاق بن عبد الله قال: «أقربُ الناس من درجة النبوة: أهل العلم، وأهل الجهاد» قال: «فأما أهل العلم فدَلّوا الناس على ما جاءت به الرسل، وأما أهل الجهاد فجاهدوا على ما جاءت به الرسل». أخرجه الخطيب في الفقيه والمتفقه
لو صحَّ قلبُ طالب العلم لكان حرصه على العمل أعظم في عينيه من حرصه على العلم، ولَكَان فواتُ نصيبه من العمل أثقل عليه من فوات شيء من العلم، وذلك أن العمل ثمرة العلم وغايته، فما أحسن ما قاله عبدالله بن إدريس (۱۹۲ هـ ) -(نسيج وحده) كما يصفه الإمام أحمد- لما سمع أبا عبيد القاسم بن سلَّام (٢٢٤هـ) يتلهّف على بعض الشيوخ، فقال له: (يا أبا عبيد، مهما فاتك من العلم فلا يفوتنَّك العمل ). وكذا قال له عبدالرحمن بن مهدي (۱۹۸ هـ) لم…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hadex7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 632,066 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الحث على طلب العلم📜” (@hadex7), 2,292 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadex7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.