Channel
@hadeswarroom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
410subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002498128181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hadeswarroom |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hadeswarroom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 410 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 413 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 414 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 414 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 March 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 123 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
153 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 45.8% | |
| 👍 | 64 | 41.8% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 12.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A few thoughts on the market: Last time I posted here I said that 60K was likely the bottom and I expected a higher low into the low to mid 70s. I got the rejection from low 80s right which was exactly at the short term cost basis and a few other converging levels that I flagged but the pullback admittedly went deeper than I expected. The low so far is 57.7K So where do things stand now? This is the apathy phase …
❤10
Been a little while, hope you guys are doing great We finally hit 80K. The four metrics I flagged a few weeks ago all converged exactly where I said they would. Here's what I'm thinking now: I think the bottom is in. 60K was likely the cycle low. I've spent the past few days trawling through the data and its pretty conclusive at this point So much seller exhaustion, realised cap distribution is healthy, ETF flows…
❤15
My base case right now is we will continue to grind higher until we hit 80s Once we hit 80s, a few different on-chain metrics converge. 1. Short term holder cost basis is here 2. Miner cost of production is here 3. ETF cost basis 4. True market mean All of these are at low 80s So what this means is that there is a massive group of people who bought the breakdown from 126K back in late '25 who want to get out a…
❤11
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤7
BTC slowly grinding up here. Looking like a classic bear market rally
👍4
Quantum is Bitcoin's final boss but it is being solved in real time Some really good news was released over the past couple of days Two independent teams dropped fixes in the same week that don't require a soft fork or changing anything to do with the protocol This isn't the full solution yet though. Satoshi's wallets are still exposed and there's a debate about what to do with these coins. These implementations n…
❤3
BTC just pushed through 70K for the first time in weeks Quick reminder of what I've been telling you guys over the past month: • On chain accumulation building in the 53-73K zone • Fed quietly expanding liquidity again (160B since dec) • Worst quantum news for crypto dropped and btc barely reacted (problem is solvable and very much priced in) • 90s gulf war pattern: markets front run resolution before it's confi…
👍8
Something I've been thinking about lately: There's going to be a lot more AI content online over the next few years which is going to make it harder to tell what's actually real and what's not The premium is gradually shifting towards in-person events. Thats where real relationships will be built and where you will meet people who will help you in the next cycle I'm planning to be at a few events over the next yea…
👍7
Was making a new video on the Fed and came across something that really gets me about the 2020 stimmy checks that were being thrown around So the government sent everyone $1,400 or so. People spent it, mostly at large companies. That spending translated into revenue for the big companies which drove the stock price up which the shareholders captured the value of A million people spending $1,000 at amazon = $1B rev…
👍10
Recorded this in full the other day Don’t forget that my pfp is Beethoven for a reason…
🔥19
Happy Easter everyone! Hope you're all having a good weekend Markets have been dead quiet today and yesterday which is fine by me. Nice to have a short break from all of these war headlines we've been having recently I'm taking it easy today so enjoy your day today, will be back tomorrow with more
👍5
Something I saw today that not many people are talking about: The Fed's balance sheet grew 18B in a single week. 160B has been injected since December. This isn't a crazy amount in the grand scheme of things for the Fed but they are quietly pumping liquidity back into the market Doesn't really change the two scenarios I laid out yesterday but it does add a small bullish factor underneath it all that most aren't tra…
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hadeswarroom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hades' War Room 🎼” (@hadeswarroom), 410 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadeswarroom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.