хотите что нибудь проведу вам вечером? вечер признаний или котиков 🐈⬛

Channel
旗市’ — Warm rain 。
@hackeracatttt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
474subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003845023092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hackeracatttt |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hackeracatttt |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 474 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 473 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 473 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 39.5%
- avg views ÷ 474 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 187
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 50.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,742 |
| Reactions total | 1,347 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,347 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253595088705062371 | 210 | 15.6% | |
| custom 5192795291144724168 | 200 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5451678026913835652 | 187 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5467470462747450532 | 150 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5357375564594308957 | 146 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5194947885803804175 | 123 | 9.13% | |
| custom 5197298611599195503 | 118 | 8.76% | |
| custom 5470115604256028448 | 109 | 8.09% | |
| custom 5384463605502607562 | 104 | 7.72% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,347reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 14
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hackeracatttt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
по всем каналам бегает:)
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 519729861159919550316custom 535737556459430895715custom 525359508870506237112custom 51927952911447241688custom 51949478858038041755custom 53844636055026075625custom 54516780269138356525custom 54674704627474505324
пожалуйста, прижми меня к себе в плотную и не позволяй отодвинуться. пожалуйста, поцелуй меня до боли в губах и оставляй на моем теле свои следы. пожалуйста, бери контроль надо мной и делай все что хочешь. пожалуйста.
custom 525359508870506237123custom 519729861159919550316custom 519494788580380417514custom 53573755645943089579custom 51927952911447241685custom 53844636055026075624custom 54516780269138356524custom 54674704627474505323
ты никогда не перестанешь идеализировать человека, что постоянно делает тебе больно и возвращает в то самое чувство. он все равно всегда будет в твоих глазах хорошим и идеальным.
custom 519494788580380417520custom 538446360550260756214custom 545167802691383565213custom 525359508870506237111custom 51927952911447241686custom 51972986115991955036custom 54674704627474505326custom 53573755645943089575
если я попрошу побыть со мной рядом, ты останешься?
custom 525359508870506237131custom 545167802691383565223custom 538446360550260756222custom 51927952911447241687custom 51949478858038041754custom 51972986115991955034custom 53573755645943089574custom 54674704627474505324
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🔔
-🤩 🤩es, I'm back in black. 💥 🤩ack in the back. 🤩f a 🤩 Cadillac. 🤩umber one 🫀 with a bullet, 🤩'm a power pack. 💀
custom 546747046274745053243custom 545167802691383565230custom 519279529114472416826custom 53844636055026075629custom 54701156042560284489custom 51949478858038041758custom 51972986115991955038custom 52535950887050623718
Sticker, posted without a caption
нет, я не люблю тебя, но я ценю тебя. я буду писать тебе постоянно и спрашивать как прошёл день, переживать по пустякам и надеяться что с тобой все хорошо, ждать твоего сообщения, постоянно проверяя чат при этом. шутить глупые шутки и пытаться привлечь твое внимание. буду дарить подарки и покупать тебе что ты захочешь, буду улыбаться, смотря на нашу переписку. буду говорить что ты мне очень сильно дорог и ты хороший.…
custom 545167802691383565227custom 519279529114472416820custom 519729861159919550320custom 519494788580380417510custom 53573755645943089576custom 53844636055026075626custom 52535950887050623715custom 54674704627474505325
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 545167802691383565226custom 519279529114472416824custom 546747046274745053221custom 519729861159919550311custom 51949478858038041759custom 53844636055026075629custom 54701156042560284489custom 52535950887050623718
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hackeracatttt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 722,052 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“旗市’ — Warm rain 。” (@hackeracatttt), 474 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hackeracatttt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.