Channel
@hackadmission
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
422subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003680815255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hackadmission |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hackadmission |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 422 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 420 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 421 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 421 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 987 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 53.8% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 46.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❌ Заебали сайты и веб-платформы, где для каждого теста нужно открывать браузер и десять вкладок? Теперь можно готовиться к IELTS прямо со своей сотки — где угодно и когда угодно. 🚀 Hack Admission официально вышел в App Store! В одном приложении: 🤖 AI-проверка Writing и Speaking 🧠 Персональный IELTS Roadmap 📚 Пробники Reading и Listening 📈 Анализ ошибок и прогресса 🎯 Подготовка к целевому баллу 7.0–8.0+ Больше ник…
❤2
Канал, где качество точно важнее количества 🤍 Привет! Я adi🫶🏻 Я создала новое пространство для тех, кто горит саморазвитием, английским и хочет улучшить свою жизнь -> я собрать вокруг себя только самую вовлечённую и близкую по духу аудиторию💌🫂 В моем канале : — говорю об учебе и жизни — делюсь проверенными материалами для изучения английского языка — показываю свой путь, образование и everyday routine 👀если тебе…
🔥1
Need-Based vs Merit-Based Scholarships: It’s vital to know the differences! Here’s a quick guide to help you decide what fits your needs best: 1. Need-Based Scholarships: These are awarded based on your financial situation. If your family’s income is low, schools may cover tuition, living expenses, and more. Always check details on the application process and required documentation! 2. Merit-Based Scholarships: The…
Struggling to sound less scripted in Speaking Part 2? Use this simple method to transform a cue card into a fluid 2-minute response: 1. Understand the Cue Card: Don’t rush. Read it carefully and identify key themes. 2. Structure Your Answer: Use a format like Situation - Feeling - Example. For instance: - Describe the topic. - Share why it matters to you emotionally. - Give a personal anecdote that relates…
Using your IELTS dashboard effectively can elevate your preparation! Instead of viewing it merely as a list, think of it as a mistake tracker. Here’s how to do it: 1. Review Your Recent Tests: Focus on the last 5 sections you've completed. Look for patterns in mistakes. Note them! 2. Analyze Weak Areas: Are you consistently weak in Listening? Make a targeted plan to address it. 3. Set Objectives: Based on your mista…
Stuck at a 6.5 in Writing Task 2? Coherence issues in your paragraphs might be the culprit. Here’s how to strengthen your paragraph logic and elevate your score: 1. Clear Topic Sentences: Start each paragraph with a strong topic sentence that outlines the main idea. 2. Logical Order: Present your ideas in a sequence that flows naturally. Consider the progression of your argument. 3. Use Connectors: Incorporate lin…
Turn your IELTS dashboard into a powerful mistake tracker! Instead of viewing it as only a list of tests, leverage its features to pinpoint and improve on your weak spots. Here's how: 1. Review Your Last Tests: Focus on the last 4-5 sections you completed. Look for patterns in your errors. 2. Identify Weak Areas: Use the data to see where you're struggling the most, whether it's reading, writing, listening, or spe…
Ready to dig into college research? Start with articles but verify with official university pages. Here’s how to do it effectively: 1. Read Articles Smartly: Use them to gather initial insights about various universities or programs. Focus on the ones shared in credible platforms. 2. Cross-Verify Info: Immediately check everything against university websites. Don't rely solely on secondary sources, as they might mi…
Stuck on a crucial application decision? The forum can be your go-to resource for insightful feedback! Here’s how to leverage it effectively: 1. Pose Your Question Clearly: Specify your dilemma. Instead of saying "I'm confused," try, "Should I apply early decision or regular?" This helps others respond accurately. 2. Engage with Responses: When members reply, thank them and ask follow-up questions. This builds a di…
Feeling lost in application tasks? Here’s a concise weekly system that balances your school research, document collection, and English preparation. Follow these steps for streamlined progress: 1. One School Task: Pick one specific task related to your prospective universities. For instance, explore their official pages to confirm unique requirements. Don’t forget to check the EducationUSA 5 Steps for guidelines. 2.…
Choosing the right scholarship type is crucial! Here's a breakdown to help you navigate your options as an international student: 1. Need-Based Scholarships: - What it covers: Based on your financial situation. Schools assess your family's ability to pay. - Application: Often requires documents like tax forms and proof of income. 2. Merit-Based Scholarships: - What it rewards: Based on academic excellence,…
Your IELTS dashboard is more than just a test overview! Use it smartly to track your errors and boost your readiness. Here’s how: 1. Review Recent Results: Focus on the last 4-5 sections you completed. Look for patterns in your mistakes. Identify if you struggle with certain question types or sections. 2. Document Recurring Issues: Note down your frequent errors. Are you misinterpreting questions? Missing timing? K…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hackadmission. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 240,437 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hack Admission - community for IELTS takers and US applicants🇺🇸” (@hackadmission), 422 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hackadmission.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.