Channel
@habibiwhatthe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
716subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001955143571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @habibiwhatthe |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/habibiwhatthe |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 716 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 722 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 727 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 742 | no change |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 742 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
148 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 30.4% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 23.0% | |
| 🎉 | 28 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 9.46% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 5.41% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 4.73% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 3.38% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 2.03% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.35% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.676% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.676% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Обожаю ТЕОРИИ ЗАГОВОРА, давайте расскажу несколько из них о ЧМ: 1. Телевизионные повторы специально подбираются. Я, абсолютно непонимающий человек в футболе, тем не менее тоже заметила странности в играх со стороны Аргентины (вот блядь вы не поверите, но мы тоже глаза имеем). Помимо явных нарушений и ужасного судейства мы так же видели как наши игроки синхронно останавливались бежать перед забитым нам мечем или 7 р…
😨3❤1🤯1
Вот еще прикольный указ, который вышел во время ЧМ. До начала матчей Аргентина составила список из 23000 человек (мужчин), которые уклонялись от уплаты алиментов. Этот список передали организаторам ЧМ и эти люди не могли приобретать билеты на матчи. Ехать на места провидения - пожалуйста, но вот смотреть матчи на стадионах запрещено. Не знаю как это проверялось / соблюдалось / организовывалось, но меня даже сама и…
🔥5👏1
Что бы вы понимали уровень футбольной культуры: сегодня Луис получил новый обновленный ID, на новом дизайне стоит три звезды - по одной за каждый кубок ЧМ по футболу. ⭐️⭐️⭐️
🔥4😱1
Понятно, что все соц сети всех людей на въезде проверять не будут, НО были и очень знаменитые товарищи, которые слишком громко возмущались. Вот так знаменитая испанская певица Розалия с 1 до 6 Августа должна давать концерты в Аргентине, билеты практически распроданы на все дни, НО… в страну ее не пустили за ее высказывания. Она конечно просит прощения, но есть ощущения, что государство устроит показательную казнь. …
🔥4😱3
В Аргентине вышел новый закон. Цитирую: «Администрация президента сообщает, что президент Хавьер Г. Милей подписал указ о введении чрезвычайного положения, в котором в качестве оснований для запрета въезда и высылки с территории страны включается любой иностранец, который направляет или подстрекает к распространению ненавистнических, дискриминационных и/или насильственных высказываний против аргентинского народа или…
🔥5👏3
Смотрим финал всей семьей.
❤5
Выпить вина на квартирнике пока ребята танцуют фольклорные танцы, сразу после того как вся страна смотрела футбол - это так по Питерски Аргентински
❤5💯2🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1
Буэнос Айрес вайб
❤9
У нас тут Аргентина 🇦🇷 выигрывает… Знаете что поняла? Что в аргентинской сборной есть еще 10 игроков, помимо Месси. Вы знали?
👏4😁3😱3❤1
Всё, какая то фигня в ТГ. Я три раза написала последний пост и все три удалились… Устал.
😨2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @habibiwhatthe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хабиби, какого хрена” (@habibiwhatthe), 716 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/habibiwhatthe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.