Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HabibAparatchi

Channel

HabibAparatchi

@habibaparatchi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001962225701
TypeChannel
Username@habibaparatchi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/habibaparatchi

Growth

222322.57 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:3823+1
11 Aug 2026, 12:4622no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:4622first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 02:43 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026

که آن اوضاع دی، در فصل فروردین نمی‌ماند ✍🏻 میرزاده عشقی 👉🏻 https://t.me/habibaparatchi دائما یکسان نماند حال دوران، غم مخور

8 Jul 2026, 02:31 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

فرصتی برای بازسازی : آمریکا و جهان ، نیاز به ذخیره ی نفت داشت جمهوری اسلامی نیاز به تجدید قوا و همچنین تبلیغات داشت! اما به نظر من بعد تبلیغاتی ، برای جمهوری اسلامی از همه چیز مهم تر بود. جمهوری اسلامی، می‌دانست که در دور بعدی جنگ ، آمریکا مجبور به پیاده کردن نیروی زمینی است ، اینجا دیگر تنها پهباد برای مبارزه کافی نیست. سربازانی نیاز است که رو در رو آماده ی جنگیدن باشند. تشییع رهبر، مهمترین دلیل توافق موقت بود، این

8 Jul 2026, 01:59 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

تحریم نفتی آمریکا دوباره برقرار شد

27 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026

حمله به کشتی تایوانی با پرچم سنگاپور توسط آمریکا پاسخ داده شد. اینبار نه کشتی متعلق به متحدان آمریکا بود و نه کسی کشته شده بود. این پاسخ یک تهدید عملی علیه جمهوری اسلامی محسوب میشود. البته که پاسخ جمهوری اسلامی باید لغو تمام مذاکرات و از سرگیری جنگ می‌بود. اما ظاهراً هفته دیگه مذاکره دارند 😳 اینکار فقط یک پیام به آمریکا می دهد : ما ضعیف و ناتوانیم 😏 https://t.me/habibaparatchi

26 Jun 2026, 06:18 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026

حمله دیروز نشان داد، بر خلاف جنجال های رسانه ای، این توافق تا چه مقدار شکننده است. آیا دلیل توافق با آمریکا اشتباه تیم مذاکره کننده نبود ؟ تیم مذاکره کننده بدون توجه به خطرات به سوئیس رفت و بعد از آن با توئیت ترامپ رو به رو شد : اگر توافق نکنند نمی توانند به خانه برگردند!!! این توافق زیر فشار و تهدید انجام شد، بنابراین حالا جمهوری اسلامی منتظر بهانه لازم برای اعلام مرگ این توافق است. 👈اسرائیل حوصله ی این بازی ها را ن

26 Jun 2026, 06:14 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

حمله به یک کشتی باری با پرچم سنگاپور : گرچه بهانه ی این حمله ، عبور نکردن این کشتی از راههای تعیین شده ی ایران بوده ، اما دلایل مختلفی میتواند داشته باشد ۱ـ تداوم نقض آتش بس در لبنان ۲- نیروهای امنیتی از رهبر ( مجتبی خامنه ای) خواسته اند در انظار حاضر نشود. بنابراین اگر ایران قصد جنگ و پاسخ به اسرائیل را داشته باشد، دیگر لازم نیست تا تشییع رهبر صبر کند! https://t.me/habibaparatchi

25 Jun 2026, 03:38 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

ترامپ میگه ما گندم و سویا میدیم نه پول نقد ! این گندم و سویا رو میشه صادر و تبدیل به پول نقد کرد. پول نقدی که می‌تونه تبدیل به موشک و پهبادهای انتحاری بشه. https://t.me/habibaparatchi

25 Jun 2026, 03:36 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

یک حسی بهم میگه، هر دو طرف فقط می‌خوان از این ۶۰ روز برای بازسازی خودشون و آمادگی برای نبرد نهایی استفاده کنند. جمهوری اسلامی به یک تنفس برای برگزاری مراسم تدفین و بازسازی ذخایر موشکی و پهبادی خودش نیاز داره و آمریکا هم همینطور. https://t.me/habibaparatchi

23 Jun 2026, 09:57 UTC568 viewsread 11 August 2026

آمریکا تحریم نفتی رو لغو کرد که می‌تونه دوباره برقرار بشه ۱۲ میلیارد دلار پول بلوکه شده رو گرفت برای کشاورزاش و مردمش رو ثروتمند تر کرد. تنگه ی هرمز رو باز کرد. و قراره به جواب بزرگترین سوالش برسه. اورانیوم غنی شده ی ایران چه سرنوشتی پیدا کرده ؟! 👈مرسی از این مذاکرات قدرتمند 🙏 واقعا قدرتمند عمل کردین. راستی وقتی آمریکا به جواب بزرگترین سوالش یعنی چه بلایی سر اورانیوم غنی شده اومده ؟ رسید ! اونوقت همین آمریکا خوبه با

21 Jun 2026, 08:28 UTC568 viewsread 11 August 2026

این منم، ساخته شده از تکه های درد و رنج ، هیولای فرانک اشتاینم 🔥🔥🔥 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZ10dLvuabs/?igsh=bWRodGFkcTAwa2l2

19 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC54 viewsread 11 August 2026

#توافق_ایران_آمریکا 48 ساعت دووم آورد 😭 جنگ در لبنان دوباره آغاز شد و ظاهراً باید منتظر شروع درگیری در ایران هم باشیم. واقعا هدف این آتش بس ها و توافق هایی که در اون باز هم جنگ هست چیه ؟ جالب تر اینه ترامپ پیش نویسی رو امضا کرد که افکار عمومی آمریکا رو عصبانی کرد و تمام رسانه های آمریکایی اونو تسلیم شدن آمریکا تفسیر کردن! همون آدمهایی که تا دیروز به ترامپ میگفتن چرا وارد جنگ شدی، حالا میگن چرا تسلیم شدی ! آیا بازی تر

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @habibaparatchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 315,480 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HabibAparatchi” (@habibaparatchi), 23 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/habibaparatchi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.