Video, posted without a caption
💔4❤3👍1
Signed وردست راز Raz

Channel
@h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
554subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001624820833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 554 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 560 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 562 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 566 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 569 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 572 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 576 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 576 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 38.7% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 32.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
💔4❤3👍1
Signed وردست راز Raz
📘آزادی، انسان، و مرزهای اندیشه ✍🏻 #آیدین_آرتا 🔻گروهی از دوستان از من انتقاد کردهاند که چرا عبدالکریم سروش را همسنگ حمید دباشی و بیژن عبدالکریمی قرار دادهام. دلیل آن را کوتاه و ساده مینویسم: بسیاری از نقش ایشان در انقلاب فرهنگی میگویند؛ اما من عادت ندارم با اتکا به گذشتهٔ انسانها، امروز آنان را قضاوت کنم. تغییر اندیشه در گذر زمان حق بنیادین انسانی است و ما همیشه باید در رابطه با دیگران نسبت به این تغییر گشوده…
❤2👍1
اگر اساس اندیشه راستی نباشد، تمام دانشی که کسب شود تنها آجرهای دیوار کجی خواهد شد که به مرور زمان تنها کج بودن دیوار را بیشتر آشکار می کند. پیر شدنی که خرد نمی آورد و تنها زاویه هولناک اندیشمند سالخورده را با حقیقت و راستی آشکارتر می سازد. #نقد_روشنفکران @h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk
❤2
Signed وردست راز Raz
نیروهای سرکوبگر سپاه ریختن تو کوچه های خلوت و شیشه ماشین های مردم رو شکستن تا بگن کار انقلابیون بوده. ملت خوب نگاه کنید تا اغتشاشگر واقعی را بینید حرام زاده این ماشین ها با پول مفت به دست نیومده 18 دی تخریب اموال
Signed وردست راز Raz
🔴دیشب مردم در مشهد (شهر سردار رشید میهن مجیدرضا رهنورد) یک ماشین قفس دار حمل معترضان بازداشتی رو متوقف کردند و با شکستن قفل، آزادیخواهان رو آزاد کردن
👍2
Signed وردست راز Raz
#پیام_شما ۲۰ مامور عراقی سرکوبگر راه خروج خیابون را نمیدونستن و در بن بست قرار گرفتن در همین حین مردم خون گرم اهوازی تمام ۲۰ راکب موتور سوار را به خاک خون کشیدن
👌8
Signed وردست راز Raz
🎥 انتقام جو (2005) 🎥 V For Vendetta 2005 🗣 دوبله فارسی 📤 کیفیت 720p ✂️ بدون سانسور - راست می گفت: این کشور با این شرایط،پارلمان و... نمیخواد! #امید میخواد...❤️❤️❤️ - اون کی بود؟ - اون ادموند دانتس بود! اون پدرم بود. مادرم بود. برادرم بود. خواهرم بود. معلمم بود. شما بودید و من! اون همه ما بود... 🖌پ.ن: اگر تاکنون این فیلم را ندیده اید، توصیه می گردد حتما ببینید! و اگر قبلا دیده اید، باز هم دیدن مجدد با دقت و…
Signed وردست راز Raz
حواسم نبود! انگشتمو خم کردم😅 اشتباه ۱۴۰۰ سال پیش را تکرار نکنید. #تلخند #طنز_تلخ #شوخی_جدی
Signed وردست راز Raz
🔴وزارت اطلاعات با یک شهروند اهل خوزستان به علت حمایت او از اعتراضات تماس میگیرد و او را تهدید میکند اگر فعالیت خود را ادامه دهی “دختر بچهت را میکشیم”. پاسخ این مرد، بسیار فراتر از حد تصور است … او فریاد میزند “دخترم فدای مَردمم”. t.me/h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk
❤3
Signed وردست راز Raz
ارسالی اینا خلن یا واقعا خلن؟؟؟؟؟🤔😐 هی میخوایم مودب باشیم اگه اینا گذاشتن آخه @h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk
Signed وردست راز Raz
وعده افزایش حقوق برای آرام کردن اعتراضات از سوی نیکلای چائوشسکو، رهبر رومانی، در آخرین سخنرانی پیش از سرنگونی حکومت و تیرباران @h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk
❤1
Signed وردست راز Raz
💡مسیر قیمت دلار از سال ۵۷ تا سال ۱۴۰۴ در جمهوری آشغالی @h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk
Signed وردست راز Raz
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Raz راز” (@h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk), 554 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/h1n5SexGt9pjYTRk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.