Channel
@gzxy8899
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003941300598 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gzxy8899 |
| Created | 22 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gzxy8899 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 13 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 13 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (22 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 266 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【所在位置】天河 【老师艺名】7777 【联系方式】 @X_huhi 【验证留名】彦祖 【验证时间】2026/8/5 【出车价位】589 【颜值身材】 该有肉的有肉 【服务内容】课表 【服务态度】 会聊天，情商高 【优点缺点】御姐又有胸 【推荐程度】强推 【自由描述】: 7777整体聊天过程非常细致，温柔拥抱和热情聊天，属于御姐但是有肉不会那么瘦 说话轻言细语，身材比例优秀，腿直长且紧致，屁股大且丰满圆润。 服务项目不赘述，嘴巴细腻且节奏优秀，服务过程无任何催钟，课程间隙老师专注服务和全身按摩，陪聊同时用手按摩j，动作轻柔舒缓，身心放松，值得再来 ❤️温馨提示：以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！
广州会所交流群报告： https://t.me/gzhso1 【会所名称】：汐悦 【会所位置】：天河石牌桥 【联系方式】：@X_huhi 【会所价格】: 589 【技师号码】: 7777 【验证留名】:阿楠 【验证时间】:8.4 【颜值评价】:很美很美很美 【身材评价】:该肉的有肉 【体验细节】：关注几天了，前几天说新茶到时候看到 ，今天虎部推荐果断预约，提前出门到达目的地，妹妹一开门，看见一张漂亮的脸，人照一致，身材贼好，比频道里发的照片还要美。开始服务，妹妹那不安分的小手就开始在我身上游走，年轻气盛的我怎么经得起这种诱惑，在我不经意间，服务到重点的时候那一刻仿佛生在天堂。7777很厉害，可我也不是省油的灯，总而言之，人美、声甜、健谈、喜欢大家无脑返就对了
Photo, posted without a caption
广州会所交流群报告： https://t.me/gzhso1 【会所名称】：汐悦 【会所位置】：天河石牌桥 【联系方式】：@X_huhi 【会所价格】: 589 【技师号码】: 222 【验证留名】:曲奇 【验证时间】:7.19 【颜值评价】:好看，妹妹类型 【身材评价】:瘦瘦 好看 【体验细节】虎部推荐的，马上出击会所挺好找的，环境不错，开门看见222，问我可以吗 我说当然可以啊 是我喜欢的类型，就像邻家女孩那种感觉 222摸我让我有点欲火焚身，接下来开始服务，让我体验到了飘飘欲仙的快乐，抚摸的让我飘飘然，后面一开始差点没忍住 飘散的头发发丝都香味 深得我的心 临出门还抱了抱我让我下次再来，喜欢年轻的女孩可以出击
广州会所交流群报告： https://t.me/gzhso1 【会所名称】：汐悦 【会所位置】：天河石牌桥 【联系方式】：@X_huhi 【会所价格】: 589 【技师号码】: 6688 【验证留名】:sn 【验证时间】:7.15 【颜值评价】:9 【身材评价】:9 【体验细节】妹妹04年的真的非常嫩，刚进屋就不冷场拉着我开始骚舞互动，让我一下就有了感觉。宽衣解带开始背面服务，我实在忍不住就开始正面服务，妹妹眉眼含羞，又热情主动，欲拒还迎让我很难把持，第一次出的很快。休息聊天十分钟又开始二番战，妹妹还中途换了一套衣服，别有一番韵味。汐悦的环境和服务都没得说，洗澡间小哥很有礼貌和服务意识，好评，下次还去
广州会所交流群报告： https://t.me/gzhso1 【会所名称】：汐悦 【会所位置】：天河石牌桥 【联系方式】：@X_huhi 【会所价格】: 589 【技师号码】: 666 【验证留名】:一位高手 【验证时间】:7.11 【颜值评价】:可爱有点御 【身材评价】:9 【体验细节】【体验细节】外表可爱，热情主动，勾人心弦，穿着白色连衣裙迎接我，文静可爱主动拉着我到房间的上聊天调情，我的双手从上到下探索了一遍才发现这个小浪蹄子竟然没穿内衣勾引我，随后她展开第一场战斗，我势必要狠狠地蹂躏她，无奈因体力不支倒在了温柔乡中.养精蓄锐下次再战。毕竟是名师后面还有客人只能这样了，回味中..必须去不去会后悔
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
广州会所交流群报告： https://t.me/gzhso1 【会所名称】：汐悦 【会所位置】：天河石牌桥 【联系方式】：@X_huhi 【会所价格】: 589 【技师号码】: 222 【验证留名】:匿名 【验证时间】:7.8 【颜值评价】:吃她颜 【身材评价】:年轻，嫩 【体验细节】看了频道直接冲了，刚好约上，到了指引上电梯，特别好找，老师开门的时候就知道来对了，很嫩，性感又清纯直击小心脏，收拾的干净整洁，老师衣服褪去逐渐显露出完美的身材，身上一点赞肉都没有，忍不住上手摸了一把，手感不错。躺床上开始调情，舔着咪咪、轻轻抚摸着小弟这酥麻的感觉一下就来了，每一下都触及灵魂，身体都不自觉微微上抬迎合。硬的小弟一跳一跳差点忍不住，老师表情妩媚，娇喘迷离知音入耳，忍不住了，直接冲刺，老师两只手搂着我，一泻千里。这感觉真的太爽了，身心愉悦。中场休息，然后二战，依旧是很爽，缴械投降。真的很喜欢，我要N刷
【会所名称】：汐悦 【会所位置】：天河石牌桥 【联系方式】：@X_huhi 【会所价格】: 619 【技师号码】: 222 【验证留名】:yao 【验证时间】:7.3 【颜值评价】:很好看的嫩妹 【身材评价】:瘦 【推荐理由】：进门映入眼帘的就是老师高挑的身材，那腿又直又好看。比人先到的先是她的香味 ，或许是体香 挺好的服务很到位 值得期待的哦，身材不错，穿的挺到位的，不得不说老师的手很嫩真的很不错 个人觉得聊得很来，长相也挺好的，总体来看值得肯定，女友感爆棚。若是有那必吃榜必投老师一票。
Photo, posted without a caption
1
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @gzxy8899. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州汐悦报告集” (@gzxy8899), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gzxy8899.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.