Channel
@gzxczj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
473subscribers
-264 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002141445902 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gzxczj |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gzxczj |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 473 | -201 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:44 | 674 | -62 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 736 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 737 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 737 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 112 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
旧金山大头🏠极品 50w粉网红陪你看球⚽️世界杯配哥哥练习运球😍 甜心足球宝贝 你的看球最佳伴侣 亲自教你如何运球 如何破紧逼 有巴西🇧🇷葡萄牙🇵🇹阿根廷🇦🇷足球宝贝啦啦队服 345.2万 获赞 753 关注 45.2万粉丝 双语主持人/自媒体博主/钢琴老师 🎤🎹🎼🎨🎬 03年167cm/32E ✨✨ ❝ 攻心尤物·翘臀美杀 💎 可sm、3t #轻熟 #御姐 纯天然雪白巨乳 絕頂蜜桃臀 欲望攻心 来势汹汹 见缝插针 性格热情聲音溫柔 精致高级 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗵𝗮𝗶 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲: 𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗘 , 𝗘𝗡𝗚𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛💗 の愛好 - 唱歌彈琴高爾夫瑜伽 环游世界20国 全球签证✅ 🔷 真实抖音网红 穿搭博主🎧
旧金山特种兵🏠纯欲网红🧡校花 ✦ S身材 甜美欲纯系 （纯兼职） ✦ 一字肩 𝔸𝟜 腰 筷子腿 马甲线 ✦ 蜜桃臀 腰上没一点赘肉 💞 ✦ 净168 年龄 04 天然🐻C 体重95 ✦
旧金山特种兵🏠Age : 2004 height ：170E 皮肤雪白榨汁机 温柔乖巧 服务一流 氵多活好不事不 人照合一
🇺🇸旧金山 萱萱🏠 06年 165cm 48kg C
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @gzxczj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“旧金山修车 旧金山围上门 KK” (@gzxczj), 473 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gzxczj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.