#初遇 #兜兜 #联系方式:@yidianyiq #验证人: #匿名 #颜值评分:9/10 #身材评分:7/10 #情绪价值:5/10 #课表内容:4.5/10 #英雄类型:#被动型(但主动找话题) #验证时间:2026-10-02 #综合评分:4/10 #细节内容: 初遇原店装修中,换到小红花的房间过渡,离地铁较远,见面前我就发现巨大的问题,会所的房间,门有窗没锁(我不在意有没有锁),设备音质差,提供洗浴的有4个位,但我尝试的三个就有两个🈚️热水,其次原本我以为音质不会影响什么,然后我发现我大错特错,音质差的会严重破坏聊天氛围,降低聊天欲望;该房间的沙发垫需要我自己摆好(我没意见),我真心不推荐在它完成装修之前去初遇,即使我依然是初遇仔。见面后,妹妹很能聊,也很努力去聊,会是个优秀的地陪,只是成为一个助教我不知道如何,课表内容浅🐍,b🐻,反馈低,虽然我不在乎yyc但为了其他客人在意的体验确实需要提升,妹妹有一颗陪伴的心,但没…

Channel
Invictus Gamer MMK 档案馆
@gz_mmker_report
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25,148subscribers
+4,802 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002622400465 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gz_mmker_report |
| Description | 广州\佛山\深圳 玩家群 报告馆 致力于打造最详尽、最真实的玩家体验数据库 助力玩家成为时间的记录者与体验的收藏家 报告发送流程:先关注玩家群@InvictusGamerMMK ,群内发送报告,按模板填写好后发送给审核员 @IG_Report_Reviewer 审核(详细要求看审核员主页说明),审核通过后会在本频道发出。 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gz_mmker_report |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 25,148 | +182 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 24,966 | +65 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 24,901 | +68 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 24,833 | +32 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 24,801 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 24,793 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 24,786 | +30 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 24,756 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 24,751 | +17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:27 | 24,734 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:43 | 24,748 | -28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 24,776 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 24,777 | +14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 24,763 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 24,753 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 24,743 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 24,727 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 24,745 | -32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 24,777 | +4,833 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 19,944 | first reading |
Engagement
677 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.35%
- avg views ÷ 25,148 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 338
- 151 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.198%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 151
- of 677 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 151 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 677 (5 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 51,099 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 18:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,660
- Videos
- ≈22
- Links
- ≈7,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
160 reactions across 134 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152 | 95.0% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.50% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 183 of the 677 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 677 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#春风 #优米 #联系方式:@ahua889527 #验证人: #鸭梨山大 #颜值评分:8.6/10 #身材评分:8.9/10 #情绪价值:8.5/10 #课表内容:9.1/10 #英雄类型:#配合型 #验证时间:2026-10-02 #优惠信息:#半价 感谢Rose兄弟 #中奖时间:2026-09-28 #综合评分:8.8/10 #细节内容: 春风位置交通非常方便,按照客服指引很快到达目的地,前台小哥也很热情。 冲好凉就在房间等待,妹妹准时进来。 优米妹妹身材很好,长得好漂亮,皮肤颜色稍微偏黄。第一次来,流程不太熟悉,完全听从妹妹指挥。 先是站立,妹妹从上到下轻轻抚摸,用鼻子轻轻呼气。接着换到趴着和仰卧两种姿势,同样是用鼻子在全身来回漫游。第一次体验这种感觉,还挺新奇,不过没有太大感觉。接着是0011,蜻蜓点水,妹妹一边看着你一边上下滑动,这个效果很好,立马树立致敬。 妹妹看我有感觉了,拿来漱口水,漱完…
#春树下 #柚子 #联系方式:@inasu23 #验证人:#鸭梨山大 #颜值评分:9.2/10 #身材评分:9.3/10 #情绪价值:9.5/10 #课表内容:9.2/10 #英雄类型:#女友型 #验证时间:2026-10-02 #综合评分:9.4/10 #细节内容: 柚子我的柚子,已经五返。 哥布林总是要刷一下存在感,柚子妹妹一点不嫌弃我,还对我这么好,一定要再记录一下。 见面照例还是一顿蛇,后面聊天得知妹妹昨天被我亲的舌头都有点痛,哎呀,悔恨当初不应该那么用力😓😓😓,连忙向妹妹道歉。 “没关系啊,舌头累也是一种锻炼,就跟健身后肌肉酸痛一样的,以后就不痛了”。 果然是高情商女大,说话都这么好听,还会安慰我,忍不住奖励一下再亲两口。 不忍心一直蛇,担心妹妹受不了,就换成补钙。妹妹🐻软软糯糯的,如水流动,丝滑无比,体验感那是相当的好。后面抱着妹妹聊天畅谈人生,直到下钟,又是完美的一天。 返完这次,会员余额都…
#觅心 #珂珂 #联系方式:@hlm_k3 #验证人: #匿名 #颜值评分:8/10 #身材评分:8/10 #情绪价值:9/10 #课表内容:8.5/10 #英雄类型:#配合 #验证时间:2026-10-02 #综合评分:8.5/10 #细节内容: 店里地铁站还有点距离,珂珂穿了一套黑色的纱裙,带个眼镜,看着挺淑女,珂珂是潮汕人,性格挺好,人照9成,略黑,骨架挺大,课表配合,亲,摸的时候都会发出嘤嘤的声音,嘤嘤怪一只,还挺有意思,和长相挺反差,长相挺御姐,适合女教师风格,珂珂可s可m,挺会说骚话,皮肤还挺滑,总体还是挺开心。 环境:离地铁挺远,打摩的8块,房间装修一半,沙发是那种贴着地面的。课表服务方面:课表很配合,还会寻龙,yyc也挺主动。 #温馨提示: MMK体验与诸多因素有关,本报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座 #报告审核: @IGWeatherBorn #报告链接: https:…
#晴时屿 #小悠 #联系方式:@qingshiyudz #验证人: #京 #颜值评分:9/10 #身材评分:9/10 #情绪价值:8.5/10 #课表内容:9/10 #验证时间:2025-9-30 #综合评分:9/10 #细节内容: 店铺位置打车比较方便,坐地铁的话需要走一段路。 看到店里有喜欢的类型就想着过去溜达一下,小悠本人比照片好看,身材也很好,bbw类型,进来后会主动聊天破冰,是一个很会聊天的小女孩,进行课表服务时也很认真,🐍技很棒,🐻也特别大,实打实的真🐻,亲着亲着会有小女友般的害羞感,胸部也是比较敏感,喜欢微胖的朋友可以冲,课室整体环境比较简约,但整体体验还是不错的。 #温馨提示: MMK体验与诸多因素有关,本报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座 #报告审核: @IGWeatherBorn #报告链接: https://t.me/gz_mmker_report
#奶思兔 #冰冰 #联系方式:@fssydy #验证人: #滨州X #颜值评分:9.0/10 #身材评分:8.0/10 #情绪价值:8/10(主动找话题 班味不重 有恋爱感) #课表内容:7.5/10 #英雄类型:#配合型 #验证时间:2026-10-01 #综合评分:8.5/10 #细节内容: 来之前就听闻冰冰是建模怪,小悠结束之后就看了一眼冰冰,嗯,颜值还不错,小脸蛋还是挺好看的,果断加一个冰冰。 冰冰小脸蛋确实权威啊,冰冰说的妈生脸,小脸小小的,高鼻梁可把她骄傲坏了。身材也是瘦瘦小小的,胸不大不小,对身形而言刚好。今天穿的是一个一体连衣裙,扒拉开吊带,真空!直接就滑下来啦!就剩一条黑丝小内裤,老诱惑啊。闲聊过程中她知道自己抽烟会影响客户体验,每次上钟前都会刷一次牙,这态度确实还可以。她喜欢去密室,还给我看她的密室视频,挺喜欢的。课表方面是配合类型,也是要就给。适合颜值党打卡一下…
#春树下 #小鱼 #联系方式:@nowlay_kf #验证人: #短发控 #颜值评分:9/10 #身材评分:9/10 瘦底大胸 #情绪价值:9/10(主动找话题/被动问答、情商高不高、说话直不直、班味重不重、是否有恋爱感) #课表内容:8/10 新人不太熟练 #英雄类型:#女友型 #验证时间:2026-10-02 #综合评分:8.5/10 #细节内容: 人照9成真人挺好看的,妹妹重庆女大来广州玩,性格很好很黏人一点都不油有点自来熟,一上来就叫宝宝宝宝的,我一个处男那受得了这种,没漱口就亲上去了🐍不久但是舌头很滑待大佬开发,嘴上亲着手也不能停攀上高峰没想到人看着瘦瘦的🐻有那么大,葡萄很敏感一下子就起立了音效拉满,不过因为前面在另外一个店前列腺液已经用完了,没啥性欲了,后面基本都是在亲亲聊天很聊得来,时不时会亲一下你很有女友感觉。喜欢纯爱女大这款的推荐 #温馨提示: MMK体验与诸多因素有关,本报告仅供参考…
❤1
#奶思兔 #小悠 #联系方式:@fssydy #验证人: #滨州X #颜值评分:8.5/10 #身材评分:8.0/10 #情绪价值:9/10(主动找话题 班味不重 有恋爱感) #课表内容:9/10 #英雄类型:#主动型 #验证时间:2026-10-01 #综合评分:8.5/10 #细节内容: 看着ootd小蛋糕小悠是我喜欢的类型,预约出击。店里环境很好啊佛山保利高档小区,客服楼下接人,有门禁。 进房间是个小床投影挺清晰,不一会小悠就穿着蓝色小jk进来了,小小个很可爱呀!太适合我了!进来小悠很快进入状态,活泼的调动气氛。小嘴甜甜的也是巴啦啦的,很有活力的小妹妹啊。小🐍头干净无异味也是甜甜的,亲吻很投入,很有沉浸感,恋爱党狂喜。 总结 :恋爱感不错,补钙敏感,主动社保。反补yyc都是有的,主打一个乖巧听话,客服推荐的是真没错啊!上钟过程听闻明天她们去漫展出cos,小悠出的是胡桃!怎能不爱,下钟…
#初遇 #兜兜 #联系方式:@yidianyiq #验证人:#ay #颜值评分:9/10(不要打10分,下同) #身材评分:9/10(b➕少女胸,白幼瘦,腿很滑,体毛不多) #情绪价值:9/10(主动找话题、情商高、说话不直、班味不重、有恋爱感) #课表内容:9/10 几乎都有 #英雄类型:#配合型 #验证时间:2026-10-02 #综合评分:9/10 #细节内容: 首先 1.兜兜颜值非常高啊,小脸,然后高鼻梁,白皮肤,标准的网红脸,有一点点婴儿肥。人照我看来是十分相似啊。 2.课表,不是大蟒蛇但是也会把舌头伸出来,相对被动,亲胸没什么反应,🐍吻没什么恋爱感吧,不过没啥所谓。 3.情绪价值真的很高,笑起来非常好看说是。也有反向补钙但是和🐍一样不怎么伸舌头所以没体验多久。好奇宝宝附身了,确实很开心我也一直在笑。 其次,小红花里地铁口比较远,步行十分钟左右到,环境上那种典型的商k房间,两个大沙发和一个按摩床,躺…
#snow #十八 #联系方式:@Xiaokefu007 #验证人: #dingff #颜值评分:8/10 #身材评分:9/10 #情绪价值:8/10 #课表内容:9/10 #英雄类型:#主动型 #验证时间:2026-10-02 #优惠信息:#半价 综合评分:8.8/10 #细节内容: 本来该晴朗的天气,竟然下雨了。刚好商城流出半价,随即购买cj。今天多等了10分钟,18来ym了。下楼买姨妈巾去了。不过还好,一开始就直接漱口开始🐍,🐍的很舒服,主动把舌头伸出来,而且是打圈,前后什么的一起上。确实很好了,yyc没让她摇太久,因为来ym腰痛。侧躺着。把玩者大🐻,确实很棒。葡萄是内馅的,肉肉感觉一抓抓不完。然后传教试了一会儿,就我躺了。18也会重新漱口后,开始反哺,反哺很久,虽然没有音效卡。但是补的很爽,也没事。事后侧躺着开🐍,后面基本都是🐍读过的,需要一段时间停下来换气。但是也很棒的 #温馨有关,本报告仅供参…
#snow #汉堡 #联系方式:@Xiaokefu007 #验证人: #只因你太美 #颜值评分:8.4/10 #身材评分:9/10(大胸萝莉) #情绪价值:9/10 #课表内容:7/10(初恋) #英雄类型: #主动型 #综合评分: 9/10 #细节内容: 雪王说有初恋的新妹妹,看到照片不得不去。 被雪王带进门,打开了灯,我一看。 她妆容出奇的清淡,唯见弯弯的眼线,有点潦草地勾勒出弧度,大眼睛灵动地眨了眨。 她坐在沙发前,我坐在另一边,隔着有些暧昧的距离。我往后靠了靠。她背影纤瘦,高挑,长长的双马尾垂到膝盖的白丝上。这个场景有些似曾相识。 我问她看什么,bilibili可以吗?她的语气有些上扬:“可以啊~你也喜欢看番吗~” “我老二次元了!” 她开始给我介绍起她去电影院看的《鬼灭之刃》。恰巧bilibili的主页上就显示着《鬼灭之刃》最新一季。 “这一季是最新的。”她…
🔥2
#蜜糖 #困困 #联系方式:@xiaosaohuo1255 #验证人: #小天才 #颜值评分:9/10 #身材评分:8/10 #情绪价值:8/10 #课表内容:7/10 #英雄类型:#配合型 #优惠信息: #-88 #验证时间:2026-10-01 #综合评分:7.5/10 #细节内容: 临时看到商城50币的卷,当真是都回家了。平时都是秒没得卷。那就cj吧。好像没怎么看到新人有报告。就cj一下踩一下。上钟妹妹一进来,看着像混血一点,第一眼还不错的。🐍上面的话。属于是配合型的,但是玩开了,就是主动了。属于小蟒蛇的,太久了妹妹会累,熊在b的大小。应该算是新人吧,没有音效卡,稍微显得一点平淡了。亲熊的话也一般了。没有反补,yyc不太会。需要自己摇。感觉是需要更精进的 #温馨提示: MMK体验与诸多因素有关,本报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座 #报告审核: @IGWeatherBorn #报告链接: https://t.me/…
Showing the 12 most recent of 677 posts we hold for @gz_mmker_report. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@gz_mmker_report edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@tianxinmmkgz2 · 19010 posts广州女仆报告馆
@mmkBaoGao · 3,1898 postsSnow报告频道
@gzsnowbg · 667 posts初恋💃mmk报告馆
@mmkchulianmmk2 · 2497 posts春田fafa报告
@chuntianfafa_report · 1,2395 posts青柠私影报告大全
@mashummk1360 · 435 posts广州晴时屿mmk报告馆
@GZqingshiyu_mmk2 · 2684 posts星遇报告频道
@kiss90001 · 4724 posts梦屿女仆 女友报告
@mengyu_mmk_report_temp · 853 posts蜜糖私影MMK报告群
@xingkongMMk520 · 4663 posts广州点心MMK报告群
@Dxmmkbg · 4772 posts广州东圃—kiss女仆私影
@KissMMK888 · 8,1142 posts点心报告群
@dxmmkba · 2132 posts海珠MMk顶级报告
@haizhummkbaogao · 2712 posts暮光里报告馆
@muguanglimmk2 · 932 posts栖屿亲测报告频道
@MYmmk003 · 1471 post广州女仆 甜心恋爱报告馆
@TXBAOGAO · 591 post甜治空间(嘉禾金铂)MMK出勤
@TXmmkgz · 3391 post广州MIA米娅MMK报告馆
@gzmiabg · 6341 post广州MIA米娅MMK恋爱馆
@gzmiamiya · 3,6761 post报告馆
@gzmmk520 · 2531 post揽月MMK报告馆
@lanyuemmk2 · 3451 post广州零距离私影mmk恋爱馆
@weimmk007 · 7281 post广州天河星耀·报告群
@xtjbs2 · 2,7621 post报告馆 广州元气少女女仆联盟
@yqsnbg1 · 6331 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@IGMMK_MainChannel · 12,82118 posts春风mmk报告群
@ZLL92933 · 55617 posts广州天河星耀·报告群
@xtjbs2 · 2,76215 posts甜心女仆mmk联盟报告馆
@tianxinmmkgz2 · 19014 posts广州晴时屿mmk报告馆
@GZqingshiyu_mmk2 · 26812 posts梦屿女仆 女友报告
@mengyu_mmk_report_temp · 8512 posts广州女仆报告馆
@mmkBaoGao · 3,18910 postsSnow报告频道
@gzsnowbg · 669 posts广州点心MMK报告群
@Dxmmkbg · 4778 posts初恋💃mmk报告馆
@mmkchulianmmk2 · 2498 posts点心报告群
@dxmmkba · 2137 posts广州剧本杀蕉趣报告榜
@jiaoquJBS77 · 367 posts报告馆 广州元气少女女仆联盟
@yqsnbg1 · 6336 posts春田fafa报告
@chuntianfafa_report · 1,2395 posts广州·米奇推荐榜
@GZJBS999 · 4,1075 posts星遇报告频道
@kiss90001 · 4725 posts青柠私影报告大全
@mashummk1360 · 435 posts梦幻报告频道
@mhbgpd · 135 posts暮光里报告馆
@muguanglimmk2 · 934 posts广州女仆 甜心恋爱报告馆
@TXBAOGAO · 594 posts猴部的报告
@xixilibaogao520 · 1,7184 posts广州东圃—kiss女仆私影
@KissMMK888 · 8,1143 posts蜜糖私影MMK报告群
@xingkongMMk520 · 4663 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@gz_mmker_report named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Invictus Gamer MMK 档案馆” (@gz_mmker_report), 25,148 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gz_mmker_report.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.