6 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC382 viewsread 8 August 2026
#更新公告 上了个直连地址（可能随时下线 看情况） 从机器人获取 另外可能要清一波未注册群友
Channel
🏝️龟仙屋公告频道
@gxwplay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
310subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004387614706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gxwplay |
| Description | 公告频道 @gxwplay 上新频道 @gwxplay_notify 机器人 @gxwplay_bot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 22 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gxwplay |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 310 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 310 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 309 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 294.3%
- avg views ÷ 310 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 912
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.581%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,562 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 76.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
1 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC563 viewsread 8 August 2026
#更新公告 新增欧洲入口(机器人中查看) 可能对某些节点有奇效
29 Jul 2026, 01:50 UTC927 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
#资源公告 电影资源破五位数 发个红包
❤5
26 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC≈1,390 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
#更新公告 1.完成 Mini App 小程序集成，后续可通过机器人完成所有操作 2.新增2000+电影资源 3.开注（机器人直接注册 500份7日体验卡 签到可续）
❤6👍4💅1
22 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,300 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
#服务升级公告：Jellyfin 下班，Emby 青春版上岗 最初选择 Jellyfin，主要是因为它开源：哪里不顺手，就能自己缝缝补补，再塞进去一些管理功能。 理想很丰满，运维很骨感。 随着用户和客户端越来越多，Jellyfin 开始出现首页查询卡顿、设备退出仍然占用名额、有些第三方客户端需要不断打兼容补丁等问题。维护成本逐渐超出预期——主要原因可能是系统复杂，次要原因是我菜。 从客户端支持程度和知名度来看，Emby 对大家更友好：可以少研究一点配置，多留一点时间看片。 但让我直接投奔闭源的官方 Emby，又多少有点不甘心。于是，我实现了一套兼容 Emby 接口的视频管理服务，姑且叫它： Emby 青春版——有 Emby 的样子，也有自己折腾的灵魂。 本次更新后： 每个账号最多登录 5 台设备、保留 5 个登录会话，同时最多播放 2 路。 目前性能测试比官方 Emby 快约 20%。实际体感可能没差别。 原…
❤5
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @gxwplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,177,992 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🏝️龟仙屋公告频道” (@gxwplay), 310 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gxwplay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.