Channel
@gwgcrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
550subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002239202509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gwgcrypto |
| Description | Канал о крипте и финансах. Несём деньги с завода в GRAM, подарки, стикеры, криптоигры. Крутим ретро, делаем тестнеты 📞 Связь ☎️ @pomidortomat111 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gwgcrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 550 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 550 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
133 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 36 | 27.1% | |
| ❤ | 32 | 24.1% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 17.3% | |
| 💩 | 21 | 15.8% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 15.0% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.752% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gwgcrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я наебу тебя или придет третий и наебет нас обоих Или в телеграмм ничего не меняется, а наёбывают прямо сотрудники. После дропа бордов я пытался не просто улучшить подарки, а попробовать словить что-то красивое, а именно красивый номер. Но как только к красивому номеру подходила очередь, улучшалась сразу пачка подарков. Эту тенденцию заметил не только я, а точнее чуваки хотели словить красивые номера, поэтому наебыв…
👍2👏1💩1
Sticker, posted without a caption
💩6
Это что за хуйня????? Мы же теперь 100 грамм
💩4👏3
Дивиденды от Variational Тут листал Х и наткнулся на пост, который объясняет уникальную механику: при долгой позиции в перпетул на акции или ETF, выплачивающие дивиденды, трейдер получает их в виде специальных funding payments. На скриншоте видно подтверждённую выплату “Dividends” по TSM-PERP в USDC, где шорты платят лонгам, что отражается как отрицательная ставка funding. Это делает перпы на RWA ближе к реальному …
👍3❤2🔥2👏1
Многие здесь новенькие, поэтому будем знакомы Этот канал начинался с криптотапалок, где нам удалось забрать несколько тысяч долларов. Затем взлетали вместе с подарками и падали тоже, но не опускали руки. Сейчас продолжаем крутить перпы, тестнеты по минимуму, а также участвуем в различных акционных мероприятиях (забрали 30% на IPO SPACEX). Из подарков тоже не ушли, коллекции сдаем в аренду и ждём лучших времен, поте…
🔥3❤2👍2👏2
Ракета полетела далеко не у всех Итак, в начале июля 2026 года биржи Bybit, Binance, Bitget и MEXC анонсировали кампании по токенизированной подписке на акции SpaceX, а вчера отменили раздачу акций прямо в день исторического IPO компании Биржи использовали единого поставщика ликвидности - платформу токенизации xStocks. Идея была простой: предложить клиентам токенизированные акции с обеспечением реальными бумагами 1…
❤3👍3🔥3
ЧТО ТУТ У ВАС ПРОИСХОДИТ Давненько не выходили на связь, всё ждал улучшений на Редо, но День Рождения ТОН прошел без особых подарков. Все мы следим за постами Павла о MTONGA, но без постов всё откатывается обратно. Расскажу почему продолжаю крутится в системе подарков и стикеров. Давненько не было громких взломов и угонов подарков, а это, как в истории с авиакатастрофами, статистически только приближает событие. По…
❤3👍2🔥2👏1
По крафтам Рост будет опять же будет временный, потому что сделали опять 50 моделей новых тех же подарков. Да, как будто их должно стать меньше и от того по идее предложение будет меньше спроса, но не будет в долгосрочной перспективе. Во-первых, подарки покупают либо в коллекцию, либо в целях перепродажи подороже в будущем. Для моей коллекции (я собираю подарки космической тематики) из вариантов новых подарков я наш…
❤5
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤5🔥2
Вышли крафты на подарки 🎁 — 57 новых моделей 🎁 — 51 новая модель Всем бы такие яйца как у этого дракона
👍4💩2
Фритюр - самолетам, пукан криптанов - космонавтам! Самолёты в России начнут летать на фритюрном масле из «Вкусно — и точка». «Газпром нефть» успешно испытала первое отечественное SAF-топливо — экологичный авиакеросин, сделанный из переработанного фритюрного масла. Интересный факт, но мы же здесь про крипту. А в крипте всё плохо, даже дроп токенов Linea тем, кто тыкал MetaMask, показывает минусовые значения (тыкайте…
💩2🔥2❤1👍1
ОПЯТЬ ЗАРАБОТАЛИ ПРОДАВЦЫ ЛОПАТ Пока вы гонитесь за уходящим нарративом мемов, пытаясь поймать очередной алмаз, который вас озолотит, пока вы чертите линии на графике биткоина, пытаясь понять куда пойдет цена, пока вы пытаетесь очередному китайцу впарить свои Lol popы в телеграмм, эти ребята зарабатывают на вас. Старинная истина о том, что во времена Золотой лихорадки заработали больше всех продавцы лопат, подтверж…
👍3💩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gwgcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GWG|CRYPTO” (@gwgcrypto), 550 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gwgcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.