Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СДВГ

Channel

СДВГ

@gvds88

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,044subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002928682999
TypeChannel
Username@gvds88
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gvds88

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@gvds88/3560 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC@ADHD3000Hz2/37467 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC1.003 minutes
@gvds88/3561 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC@ADHD3000Hz2/37477 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC1.003 minutes
@gvds88/3562 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC@ADHD3000Hz2/37487 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC1.006 minutes
@gvds88/3566 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC@ADHD3000Hz2/37527 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC1.003 minutes
@gvds88/3570 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC@ADHD3000Hz2/37567 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC1.003 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ADHD3000Hz25 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @gvds88 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,0444,2714,157.56 August 2026 — 4,148 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,147 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,192 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,271 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,262 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,253 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,256 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,265 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,269 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,193 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,159 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,154 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,146 subscribers26 September 2026 — 4,120 subscribers4 October 2026 — 4,118 subscribers10 October 2026 — 4,113 subscribers14 October 2026 — 4,099 subscribers17 October 2026 — 4,097 subscribers20 October 2026 — 4,098 subscribers25 October 2026 — 4,083 subscribers28 October 2026 — 4,074 subscribers31 October 2026 — 4,058 subscribers3 November 2026 — 4,054 subscribers6 November 2026 — 4,053 subscribers9 November 2026 — 4,065 subscribers14 November 2026 — 4,044 subscribers6 August 202614 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 100 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,010–4,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 20:494,044-21
9 Nov 2026, 11:374,065+12
6 Nov 2026, 02:494,053-1
3 Nov 2026, 04:484,054-4
31 Oct 2026, 12:214,058-16
28 Oct 2026, 11:264,074-9
25 Oct 2026, 18:374,083-15
20 Oct 2026, 01:374,098+1
17 Oct 2026, 02:184,097-2
14 Oct 2026, 09:384,099-14
10 Oct 2026, 20:414,113-5
4 Oct 2026, 23:564,118-2
26 Sept 2026, 02:384,120-26
16 Sept 2026, 22:404,146-8
13 Sept 2026, 06:164,154-5
9 Sept 2026, 14:364,159-34
3 Sept 2026, 23:584,193-76
31 Aug 2026, 21:134,269+4
29 Aug 2026, 04:374,265+9
26 Aug 2026, 05:454,256first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 39 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 39 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gvds88. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC254 views0 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

если вам нравится женщина скажите ей что у вас есть 20 тысяч долларов. никто ей такого не говорил если она все еще в вашем круге общения. может у вас их нет. но у других то их точно нет

7 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 8 August 2026

подпишитесь на мой платный канал t.me/tribute/app?startapp=szOp

7 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Начались бои у Малой Токмачки — СМИ Военкоры сообщают, что ВС РФ продвинулись на 3 километра на подступах к западной части Малой Токмачки, заняв новые позиции. Подробности уже в СДВГ+ t.me/tribute/app?startapp=szOp

7 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 8 August 2026

хм.. интересный канал... t.me/tribute/app?startapp=szOp

7 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 8 August 2026

у вас было вы травите одноклассника в школе и в какой то день понимаете ну все он обрел стержень уже так просто его не унизить и вы просто почти насмерть его забиваете стульями до инвалидности

7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 8 August 2026

я вижу что яблоко форсят но хз почему, подозреваю что максим кац говорит что то типа показать что мы есть... но не стоит показывать путину что вы есть, он ненавидит русских и хочет их всех убить, лучше наоборот не отсвечивать, максим кац не особо вовлечен не понимает этого

7 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈2,570 viewsread 8 August 2026

Многие спрашивают у меня марксоид стоит ли голосовать за партию яблоко. Нет потому что оно проиграет. Думаю стоит голосовать за единую россию потому что она выиграет.

7 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

прав... хотя в тоже в доту не играю

7 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 8 August 2026

показательный баттл конечно... там у оксимирона первый раунд мол ты раньше был андеграунд а теперь нет... лицемерно слава... далеко не первый раз когда еврей педофил пытается пристыдить русского который захотел зарабатывать чуть больше 50к рублей в месяц

7 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 8 August 2026

но готовиться месяцами для эмси унизительно...

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @gvds88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СДВГ” (@gvds88), 4,044 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gvds88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.