Channel
@gutless_fiend
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
350subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002356305446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gutless_fiend |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gutless_fiend |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 350 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 350 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (26 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,289 |
| Reactions total | 426 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
426 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5271551625415136057 | 62 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5215619885521990996 | 59 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5237912913271875543 | 40 | 9.39% | |
| custom 5332565303756887527 | 34 | 7.98% | |
| custom 5465597509114030385 | 28 | 6.57% | |
| custom 5355304986630696613 | 23 | 5.40% | |
| custom 6005684011588915582 | 14 | 3.29% | |
| custom 5192899731864441107 | 12 | 2.82% | |
| custom 5377708034262854705 | 12 | 2.82% | |
| custom 5190634961249538482 | 8 | 1.88% | |
| custom 5192958684585560300 | 6 | 1.41% | |
| custom 5271669925994317207 | 6 | 1.41% | |
| custom 5298937406341282412 | 6 | 1.41% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 1.41% | |
| custom 5377616916531663455 | 4 | 0.939% | |
| custom 5404756926544256225 | 4 | 0.939% | |
| custom 5210996499256723953 | 3 | 0.704% | |
| custom 5271882299242200234 | 3 | 0.704% | |
| custom 5299040880693376948 | 3 | 0.704% | |
| 5 further kinds | 7 | 1.64% |
Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 426reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gutless_fiend. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Чваак просто делает со мной вп тем самым обрекает себя на мьюшность от меня
custom 53325653037568875275custom 52989374063412824123❤2custom 51928997318644411071custom 51930363461841932711custom 54047569265442562251
Люблю взаимодействовать со своими мью какими-либо образами. Иногда смешно, когда они не понимают, что пишу я (типа пишу с основы, а не от канала)
custom 519289973186444110711❤3custom 54047569265442562253custom 51906349612495384821custom 52989374063412824121custom 53776169165316634551custom 60056840115889155821
.Hi!! I'm ᴘʏʀᴘʏʀɴᴀᴀꜱᴡɪᴛ ! Я тот самый художник с ебанутой оской канибалкой!!🤣 И так..эм.. только не обижайтесь на мой канал ок?🤮 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Ты любишь проблематичных художников? Или тебе нравится смотреть на "я такой эйджи подросток посмотрите на меня!!!!"💖 🤩То тебе точно ко мне. 🤩 🤩я не несу ответственность за людей с которыми делаю вп а так же в этом канале довольно грубый владе…
custom 52715516254151360573❤1custom 51883575333659728401custom 52989730030302240731
#вп
𝂅ׄ ۫ᰋ ۫✉️✉️𝂅ׄ 教 . ۫໒꒰ྀི◞ ˕ ◟꒱১ ִ 🌟 🤩🤩 🍼 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🍼 ✉️✉️ 🍼➖ривет всем, кто сюда случайно (или нет) зашёл 🍼 Я ➖ешак, или просто Кеша. И да, мои местоимения — оно/он/его➖ так что можете юзать, как вам удобнее. 🍼 🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🛢🍼 🌫🌫 🍼 🍼Предупреждаю: ⚪️ если вы ждёте тут милых котиков и радугу, то да, они тоже здесь будут, но есть но! Тут я ещё угораю по всей дичи: гуро, нсфв, фетиши, и всякий такой "трэш", от кото…
custom 51906349612495384825❤1custom 52989374063412824121custom 53776169165316634551
УХ ТЫ СКОЛЬКА ЗВЕЗДЧК СПАСИБО БОЛЬШoe МОИ ЛЮБИЫЕ 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
❤14custom 54655975091140303853custom 52715516254151360572custom 53777080342628547051
Участвую в #ризитянконкурс Риза светильник https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4V7u53N/
❤27custom 535530498663069661311custom 52716699259943172076custom 52990408806933769483custom 51906349612495384822custom 52715516254151360572custom 53776169165316634552custom 53777080342628547052
СПАСИБО ЗА ЗВЕЗДОЧКИ МИЛАШКА
❤7custom 53325653037568875275custom 54655975091140303853
🍹🍹 🍹🍹 надеюсь, все прочитают этот рассказик и поймут все отсылки. и в рассказе, и на самом арте их много
custom 521561988552199099615custom 523791291327187554311custom 52715516254151360577❤2custom 51930363461841932711custom 52989374063412824121custom 53777080342628547051custom 54655975091140303851
Posted without readable text
custom 527155162541513605713❤9custom 53777080342628547056🍌2custom 54655975091140303852🌭1custom 52156198855219909961custom 52379129132718755431
Спасибо за звездашкаааа
custom 600568401158891558212custom 53325653037568875274custom 53553049866306966134
File, posted without a caption
custom 521561988552199099613❤5custom 52379129132718755434custom 51929586845855603002custom 52718822992422002342custom 53553049866306966131
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @gutless_fiend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 557,797 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“gutless_fiend [21+]” (@gutless_fiend), 350 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gutless_fiend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.