Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гумилёв Алексей

Channel

Гумилёв Алексей

@gumiliov

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

494subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001414651110
TypeChannel
Username@gumiliov
Created28 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gumiliov

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@gumiliov/2595 · this entry2 Jan 2024, 13:45 UTC@za_bru/7632 Jan 2024, 13:47 UTC1.002 minutes
@gumiliov/2589 · this entry1 Dec 2023, 11:55 UTC@za_bru/7571 Dec 2023, 11:55 UTC0.99under a minute
@gumiliov/2596 · this entry2 Jan 2024, 13:46 UTC@za_bru/7642 Jan 2024, 13:47 UTC0.9972 seconds
@gumiliov/2585 · this entry20 Nov 2023, 08:43 UTC@za_bru/75320 Nov 2023, 08:43 UTC0.99under a minute
@gumiliov/2587 · this entry23 Nov 2023, 14:17 UTC@za_bru/75523 Nov 2023, 14:17 UTC0.99under a minute
@gumiliov/2594 · this entry31 Dec 2023, 15:56 UTC@za_bru/76231 Dec 2023, 15:57 UTC0.9972 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@za_bru13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (130)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 17 November 2023 to 9 May 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @gumiliov — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4946 Aug 2026, 09:47 — 494 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:47 — 494 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:476 Aug 2026, 18:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 493–495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:47494no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:47494first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
608
Videos
257
Links
1,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

766 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍68289.0%
🔥476.14%
💯121.57%
70.914%
👏70.914%
😢40.522%
😱30.392%
🌚10.131%
🙏10.131%
🤔10.131%
🤡10.131%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 766reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2023 to 9 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 May 2024, 10:35 UTC≈1,400 views86 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ПОЧЕМУ НАС ХОТЯТ ЗАСТАВИТЬ ЗАБЫТЬ НАШУ ПОБЕДУ Отрывки из интернета на 9 мая: “Да чего вы носитесь со своим Днём Победы? 80 лет прошло, а всё никак не успокоитесь. Лучше вместо ваших пьянок и дорогих парадов раздать эти деньги ветеранам, да пусть себе мирно доживают. Это больная нация страдальцев, которая живёт трагедией прошлого, поэтому какое у неё может быть будущее”, – говорят наши (и не совсем наши) дорогие мысл

👍74🔥6💯42

17 Apr 2024, 10:55 UTC≈1,240 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026

СТРАСТИ ПО УМИРАЮЩЕЙ ОЛИМПИАДЕ Наконец-то Макрон объяснил, почему российским спортсменам нельзя выступать под своим флагом, а израильским – зя. Оказывается всё потому, что по мнению французского позёра Израиль мягкий и пушистый, а Россия… А что Россия? Там холодно и пьяные медведи с балалайками ходят. «Нельзя сказать, что Израиль является нападающей стороной. Он подвергся террористической атаке и отвечает на неё»,

👍492

15 Apr 2024, 13:32 UTC≈1,230 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026

КАК ШАРЛАТАНСТВО СТАЛО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ РЕЛИГИЕЙ УКРАИНЫ Тяжёлые времена всегда порождают массу сект, культов и других “потомственных ясновидящих”, которые с радостью засунут руку в карман доверчивого идиота. Так было в 90-е, когда всевозможные белые братства, “боги” по имени Кузя и прочие иеговисты буквально оккупировали страны СНГ. Ведь это было особенно легко сделать после падения советского атеистического режима

👍29

10 Apr 2024, 12:46 UTC868 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026

РАЗВЕ ЗАПАД ПРОЗРЕЛ? В конце прошлого года на футбольном поприще возник скандал из-за того, что американское издание “Washington Post” задалось вопросом: “Почему в сборной Аргентины нет темнокожих игроков на чемпионате мира?”. На что аргентинцы ответили: “Потому что мы страна, а не диснеевский фильм”. И в самом деле, мало того, что пиндосы сунули нос туда, куда собака не совала, так они ещё вздумали делать упрёки д

👍40🙏1

8 Jan 2024, 13:10 UTC≈1,350 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ЗА ЭТО СТОЯЛ МАЙДАН Только отшумели новости о реалистичных масках старика, которые якобы позволят молодым украинцам избежать преследования военкомов на улицах городов, как режим Зеленского преподносит новую порцию новостей о темпах мобилизации. Сообщается, что Кабмин выделил 1,74 млрд гривен на уроки "Защиты Украины" в школах. Из них 100 млн пойдут на "развитие учителей" и 1,64 млрд – на закупку учебного оборудован

👍31🔥5😢3

2 Jan 2024, 13:46 UTC≈1,390 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Однако, простите, но откуда Тарас Григорьевич вообще научился писать, читать, и весьма искусно писать картины? А прочие украинские культурные деятели? Неужто их всему этому научило злобное панство? Украинский язык и украинская литература – вот 2 основных источника бед страны 404. С таким вечным негативом, восприятием через литературу и выражением депрессивных слов писалась история Украины, которая тоже не оставляет

👍46

2 Jan 2024, 13:45 UTC811 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

УКРАИНСКАЯ ТРЕНОГА И ЕСТЬ ЛИ У НЕЁ БУДУЩЕЕ Наступил новый 2024 год. Год, когда для нас ещё немного приоткроется тайна будущего Украины. Если, конечно, это будущее вообще есть у страны, которая на протяжении 10 лет тает не только территориально, но и вообще во всех направлениях, вплоть до популяции самих украинцев, что исчезают в окопах, в других странах или вовсе не рождаются. Таков был изначальный путь Украины. Стр

👍22

31 Dec 2023, 15:56 UTC613 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Первая часть выше 👆 Лично от себя хотелось бы отметить, что как бы не кричали кастрюли, что Украина – не Россия, но как минимум в культурном плане мы всё же остаёмся одним народом. Иначе как объяснить популярность в обеих странах нового “Чебурашки” и “Слово пацана”? Обе ленты наделали много шума на Украине, ведь украинцы наперекор запретам “министерства правды” продолжают смотреть русский кинодел. По моему субъекти

👍44

31 Dec 2023, 15:56 UTC588 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ИТОГИ ГОДА И ПРОГНОЗ “ПОГОДЫ” Провал украинского контрнаступления не стал для нас неожиданностью, однако почему-то сильно удивил Запад и разрекламированный контрнаступ стал для многих событием года. Не удивительно, ведь наряду с этим событием западного обывателя почему-то очень интересовала судьба глубоководного аппарата “Титан”, в котором умерло 5 каких-то богачей. Впрочем, стоит отдать должное, западный мирок обе

👍17

18 Dec 2023, 14:32 UTC890 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ЗЕМЛЯ — ЭТО ПРОБЛЕМЫ НЕ РАБОВ, А ХОЗЯЕВ УКРАИНЫ Срочные новости! За всё время боевых действий на Украине ни один сын украинского олигарха не пострадал. Более того, ни один друг, брат, сват, кум и т.д. Зеленского не пострадали. Все “народные” депутаты Украины целы и даже неплохо наваривают на войне. Впрочем, за исключением тех, кто пострадал во время “боевых” действий далеко от линии фронта в кабинетах Закарпатья. Ин

👍27💯8🔥21😢1

13 Dec 2023, 13:46 UTC995 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

УКРАИНСКИЙ “БУМЕРАНГ” ИЗ ДОНБАССА На Украине замечены длинные очереди за SIM-картами “lifecell” и “Vodafone”, потому что “Киевстар” склеил ласты на неопределённый срок. Припоминаю нечто похожее было на Донбассе, когда, кстати, первым ещё в 2014 году отключился сверхпатриотичный “Киевстар”, потому что мы “сепары, кацапы” и всё такое, потом ахметовский “life”, а в последнюю очередь и “Vodafone”. После падения последн

👍37🔥5

6 Dec 2023, 12:32 UTC≈1,030 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ВСЯ УКРАИНА В ОДНОЙ НОВОСТИ Помню конец 2013 года. Отшумели споры о конце календаря майя, конце света и других “тонких материях”. Нам ещё только предстояло понять, что конец календаря каких-то дикарей – не самая важная тема на планете. Лично мне только предстояло осознать, что детства наших детей будут полностью состоять из военных дней. Были у меня тогда товарищи, осевшие в Киеве, активно поддерживающие майдан. В

👍31🔥91🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gumiliov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 442,505 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гумилёв Алексей” (@gumiliov), 494 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gumiliov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.