Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГОСГУМА

Channel

ГОСГУМА

@gumik228

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002244399537
TypeChannel
Username@gumik228
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gumik228

Growth

525553.514 August 2026 — 55 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55 subscribers23 August 2026 — 54 subscribers30 August 2026 — 52 subscribers14 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 15:0352-2
23 Aug 2026, 22:3454-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:1655no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:0555first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 49s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54182959047067728021217.1%
custom 5312248459179344429912.9%
custom 540013249660193166668.57%
custom 542739658821969346768.57%
custom 542689666261636162657.14%
🤣57.14%
custom 546565282399783527345.71%
45.71%
🔥45.71%
😈45.71%
🥰45.71%
custom 536209213447001079234.29%
custom 532576189517138837522.86%
custom 533479036739913768622.86%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Mar 2026, 06:22 UTC45 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @guma_medovyxaPhoto

🤩2-50 подписка на нас, итоги на 50 сабов 🤩

8 Mar 2026, 19:10 UTC43 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @gumazzzz

https://t.me/guma_medovyxa Сабку наша общая кф, будем постить туда абсолютно все, от самосливов/сливов до забавных реков

29 Nov 2025, 07:21 UTC184 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @medovrani4kaVideo

Video, posted without a caption

14 Nov 2025, 08:58 UTC264 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Шо с пабгерами не так

4🤣1🥰1

8 Nov 2025, 15:36 UTC165 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @medovrani4kaVideo

Video, posted without a caption

10 Oct 2025, 00:35 UTC266 viewsread 14 August 2026
Video

АХХАЭАЭААЭАЭЭАЭАЭЭАХЭАХАХАХХАХАХАХАХАХА ЭТО ШТО ЗА КРУТЫЕ ОППЫ В 25 ГОДУ

28 Aug 2025, 03:45 UTC319 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Папа троллинга вернулась?

custom 54273965882196934674

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gumik228. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГОСГУМА” (@gumik228), 52 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gumik228.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.