Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Я б купила

Channel

Я б купила

@guide_yabkupila

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32,946subscribers

-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545569556
TypeChannel
Username@guide_yabkupila
DescriptionЛучшие находки и подборки от команды опытных стилистов. Обратная связь: @pr_guide_yabkupila Мы в МАХ: https://max.ru/guide_yabkupila РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673f0fcdc577eb7c520bb4bb&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/guide_yabkupila

Growth

32,91833,09733,007.57 August 2026 — 33,097 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,097 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,092 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,088 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,060 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,051 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,041 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,029 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,035 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,026 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,021 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,002 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,985 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,976 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,968 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,957 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,940 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,931 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,951 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,962 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,958 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,956 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,954 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,944 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,934 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,918 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,942 subscribers6 September 2026 — 32,946 subscribers32,9467 August 20266 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 30 days, net -151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,891–33,124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 21:5932,946+4
4 Sept 2026, 06:5732,942+24
2 Sept 2026, 20:3532,918-16
1 Sept 2026, 21:2532,934-10
31 Aug 2026, 18:2432,944-10
30 Aug 2026, 18:5732,954-2
29 Aug 2026, 20:1832,956-2
28 Aug 2026, 16:5732,958-4
27 Aug 2026, 18:1732,962+11
26 Aug 2026, 15:4732,951+20
25 Aug 2026, 17:0732,931-9
24 Aug 2026, 17:5632,940-17
23 Aug 2026, 04:4832,957-11
21 Aug 2026, 18:5632,968-8
20 Aug 2026, 16:4332,976-9
19 Aug 2026, 17:0332,985-17
18 Aug 2026, 17:2233,002-19
17 Aug 2026, 18:4433,021-5
16 Aug 2026, 16:2433,026-9
15 Aug 2026, 03:2733,035first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.73%
avg views ÷ 32,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,200
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held46 (6 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total128,180
Reactions total2,634
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 07:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,030
Videos
31
Links
1,630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,984 reactions across 46 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,40046.9%
👍67022.5%
🔥41714.0%
😁2939.82%
🥰1173.92%
😍260.871%
💯240.804%
🤔160.536%
👎120.402%
💔80.268%
10.034%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,984 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.17%
1 of 46 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,190
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,050
over 45 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeVJLg3117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 09:55 UTC≈2,690 views137 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Цветные носки и гольфы — тот самый маленький акцент, который этой осенью может полностью изменить привычный образ. Особенно любим сочетание с брюками и джинсами: яркий цвет выглядывает буквально на несколько сантиметров, но делает весь образ интереснее. Нравится приём, когда цвет носков поддерживает другой акцент в образе — свитер, шарф или деталь верхнего слоя. ❤️ — однозначно носим.

102👍27🥰7🔥1

4 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈4,280 views157 reactionsread 9 September 2026
File

А чтобы ничего не пришлось искать самостоятельно, оставляем файл с кликабельными ссылками на каждое изделие ❤️

🔥6955👍28😍5

4 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,770 views142 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Собрали образы на сентябрь 🍂 Где-то ещё хочется оставить немного лета и цвета, а где-то мы уже не удержались и добавили ботильоны — всё-таки осень постепенно вступает в свои права. В подборке — спокойная база, яркие оттенки, многослойность и сочетания, которые легко повторить и адаптировать под свой гардероб.

83👍27🔥24🥰6😍2

2 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC≈4,460 views116 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Розовый + оливковый. За окном уже по ощущениям осень, но отпускать зелень и яркость пока совсем не хочется — кажется, идеальный компромисс найден. Сочетание, которое заметно звучало в коллекциях этого года и которое мы точно забираем с собой в 🍂

63👍31🥰12🔥10

1 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC≈4,700 views133 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Муд 😁

😁98🔥21👍94💯1

31 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈4,970 views70 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Завтра 1 сентября, вокруг всё больше офисной эстетики — кажется, самое время снова открыть щиколотки. После нескольких сезонов широких брюк в пол возвращаются укороченные модели: прямые, слегка зауженные, со стрелками и без. Тот самый аккуратный силуэт из 90-х, который особенно хорошо работает с жакетами, рубашками и трикотажем. И обувь здесь наконец становится полноценной частью образа: лоферы, балетки, туфли на н

40👍21🥰7🔥2

29 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈4,850 views73 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Лонгслив с контрастными рукавами — ещё одна база, которая вернулась к нам из 90-х и нулевых. Тот самый крой реглан, напоминающий винтажные бейсбольные футболки, снова активно появляется в коллекциях и уличных образах. И нам нравится, как простая игра двух оттенков делает привычный лонгслив гораздо интереснее. Однозначно забираем его с собой в осень: будем носить с джинсами, широкими брюками и юбками, а с похолодани

38👍23🔥12

28 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈3,650 views56 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Давно мы не заглядывали в Lichi. Раньше бренд часто появлялся в наших подборках, а в последнее время мы как-то от него отдалились. Исправляемся! Повод отличный — новая коллекция «Академия искусств»: костюмная полоска, строгий деним, приталенные силуэты, контрастные детали и кружево. И здесь у нас случилось сразу несколько «да»: приталенный джинсовый жакет и расклешённые джинсы, коричневый костюм в тонкую полоску,

36👍12🥰6🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈3,950 views66 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Ирина, это вау! ❤️ Новая капсула GI от 12 STOREEZ — тот случай, когда хочется рассматривать не только образы целиком, но и материалы в деталях. В этом сезоне Ирина Голомаздина впервые работает с натуральным мехом кролика, апсайкл-мехом норки, итальянской кожей с тиснением под ящерицу и крокодила и кашемиром с длинным ворсом. Плюс — более сложные конструкции и обработки. Особенно хороша съёмка: ночь, немного гранжа

39👍20🥰6🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈2,750 views57 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, пошли искать сливовый у брендов — и нашли 💜 Пока вещей в этой гамме не так много, как хотелось бы, но кое-что интересное уже нашли. От глубокого баклажанового до более мягкого сливового — собрали первые удачные варианты. Судя по тому, насколько активно эта палитра была представлена на показах FW 2026/27, дальше явно будет больше — ждём новые коллекции. 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 6/ 7/ 8

40👍11🔥4🥰1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈3,340 views137 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сливовый и баклажановый — ещё одна важная цветовая история сезона. После нескольких сезонов бордового палитра уходит глубже в фиолетовый подтон. Сливовый выглядит благородно, но свежее: сложный, насыщенный и при этом легко вписывается в повседневный гардероб. Особенно хорош с шоколадным, серым, чёрным и молочным, а интереснее — с приглушённым зелёным или лимонным. Собрали пины для вдохновения ✨ А теперь пойдём см

62🔥49😍15🥰7👍4

26 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈2,300 views22 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Знаете, есть такие каналы, где на вас сразу наваливаются: 15 шагов ухода, 40 банок, в формате «ты ничего не понимаешь, но должна». А есть где уход — это поддержка, как в «Культ ухода». Автор Даша разбирается в красоте, но оставляет право быть собой. 🌿 Легкие рецепты для стройности 🌿 Комбо подборка проверенных масок, чтобы быть роскошной 🌿 Топ-банки для красивых волос до 1000 рублей 🌿 Секрет ухоженного и свежего

11👍6🥰31🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @guide_yabkupila. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Я б купила” (@guide_yabkupila), 32,946 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guide_yabkupila.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.