Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for guesti channel

Channel

guesti channel

@guestii22

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,204subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001984732318
TypeChannel
Username@guestii22
Description@neguesti
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/guestii22

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

23,800 average views per post against 23,204 subscribers — an engagement rate of 102.5%. Across the 13,832 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,016–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.59% and 18.4%, with a median of 9.17%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured8 of 8 published in the window (0 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled190,200
Mature posts only102.5% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers23,204 measured 25 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 13,832 channels · p10 2.33% · p25 4.59% · p50 9.17% · p75 18.4% · p90 33.2%
Position in cohort99.769th percentile · 11.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.132% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

23,20423,75123,477.57 August 2026 — 23,259 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,262 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,253 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,472 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,543 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,579 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,607 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,721 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,751 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,749 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,734 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,730 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,705 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,687 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,677 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,670 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,660 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,665 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,673 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,666 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,652 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,647 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,628 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,598 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,586 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,549 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,529 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,505 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,480 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,426 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,369 subscribers18 September 2026 — 23,330 subscribers25 September 2026 — 23,204 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,122–23,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 00:3723,204-126
18 Sept 2026, 16:3823,330-39
16 Sept 2026, 11:5823,369-57
14 Sept 2026, 15:1723,426-54
13 Sept 2026, 04:5823,480-25
11 Sept 2026, 10:0023,505-24
8 Sept 2026, 15:3723,529-20
5 Sept 2026, 08:5723,549-37
3 Sept 2026, 10:0223,586-12
2 Sept 2026, 03:5223,598-30
1 Sept 2026, 02:0423,628-19
31 Aug 2026, 02:2423,647-5
29 Aug 2026, 23:5223,652-14
29 Aug 2026, 02:1323,666-7
27 Aug 2026, 22:3423,673+8
26 Aug 2026, 20:0423,665+5
25 Aug 2026, 20:2623,660-10
24 Aug 2026, 23:2223,670-7
23 Aug 2026, 07:4823,677-10
21 Aug 2026, 16:1823,687first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.5%
avg views ÷ 23,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
23,800
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held30 (16 July 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total190,200
Reactions total7,054
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 01:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,160
Videos
≈273
Links
≈242

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

35,037 reactions across 30 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤23,28366.5%
❤‍🔥2,7637.89%
💘2,4296.93%
🤣1,1973.42%
🔥1,1513.29%
🕊1,0432.98%
👍8102.31%
😭3470.99%
😁3220.919%
💅3140.896%
🤯2770.791%
🍾1640.468%
🎉960.274%
🙊830.237%
🍌810.231%
🥰770.22%
🖕680.194%
🥱660.188%
⚡580.166%
💋470.134%
28 further kinds3611.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,037 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
232
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 30 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @guestii22. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC≈13,100 views1,036 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤692🤣208❤‍🔥75😎17🔥10😁9💘7🆒7

15 Sept 2026, 22:55 UTC≈22,900 views913 reactions5 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

фух

❤749💘69❤‍🔥50💅11👍8🍌7🔥7👎6

15 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC≈22,400 views301 reactions2 Starsread 27 September 2026

https://link.brawlstars.com/voucher/245003b4-fb51-487b-a434-6d2143c13d71 Сундук космо

❤228💋30💘17❤‍🔥12😭8🤩2😢2⚡1

15 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC≈20,300 views673 reactions2 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Чей же пик лучше

❤530❤‍🔥56💅42🤣16💘9👍8🔥6🆒4

14 Sept 2026, 00:33 UTC≈19,800 views1,309 reactions12 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Айм матчерино виннер айм бест аххххх

❤1,050😁129💅65🤣21💘16🆒11❤‍🔥10👍2

12 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈18,600 views737 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

С друном

❤596❤‍🔥70⚡32🤣12🍾8🤯5🔥4🍓3

4 Sept 2026, 18:55 UTC≈33,000 views856 reactions4 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Веселая мета

❤663🤣102🔥43❤‍🔥14🖕14👍8🍓4💘3

30 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈40,100 views1,229 reactions14 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Бэк ту бэк Чемпионы Киберхиро на 6000$ с променом и селяви

❤1,000❤‍🔥109🤯71🎉13🖕11💅7💘5🤬5

26 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈46,900 views2,764 reactions30 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

За шо

❤1,980🤣485❤‍🔥97😭95💔44😁21🔥13🙏12

21 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC≈45,300 views1,516 reactions7 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Йобнули пацика

❤1,120😭238❤‍🔥87💘22🕊13🥰10🖕8🔥7

20 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈43,800 views452 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

Сундук Венди https://link.brawlstars.com/voucher/7ddb9b29-f23b-4b0f-93d8-093220fd1f94

❤340🥱52❤‍🔥20👎10👍7💅7🤗7💘3

17 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈38,300 views1,512 reactions9 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Уже близко

🕊1,020❤‍🔥275❤149🔥17🥰12😁9🍌7👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @guestii22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

YT | Эль Ниньо ТВ
@elninotv · 33,645
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
BEZSMERTNY 💍
@bezsmertny_bs · 258,439
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
будка алекза
@alekzz03 · 98,799
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 August 2026
CrySoul
@crysoul · 29,206
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 7 September 2026
Rost Lairs
@Rost_Lairs · 235,025
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
Cleopatra YouTube
@cleopatra_youtube · 43,380
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Hiko
@hikoded · 115,601
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 13 August 2026
Gene's Land
@gene_land · 46,698
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 26 August 2026
mma_bs (Петр Олегович)
@goodMMA · 87,116
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
FLYING MINER | BS
@flyingminerr · 52,842
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
Brawl Stars Datamines | BSD
@bsdatamines · 449,794
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 August 2026
Mercy Brawl Stars
@mercybrawlnews · 25,415
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“guesti channel” (@guestii22), 23,204 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guestii22.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.