Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

будка алекза

@alekzz03

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

109,108subscribers

-814 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001763695591
TypeChannel
Username@alekzz03
Descriptionлучший VPN для игры без лагов - @alekzzVPNbot реклама/сотрудничество - @alekzzbrawlstars реклама - @easy_qq/@oldpurple будка гемов - t.me/budkagemovbot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alekzz03

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

109,108109,922109,5158 August 2026 — 109,922 subscribers8 August 2026 — 109,893 subscribers9 August 2026 — 109,699 subscribers10 August 2026 — 109,536 subscribers11 August 2026 — 109,310 subscribers12 August 2026 — 109,108 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 4 days, net -814. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108,986–110,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:02109,108-202
11 Aug 2026, 05:01109,310-226
10 Aug 2026, 03:30109,536-163
9 Aug 2026, 05:52109,699-194
8 Aug 2026, 07:25109,893-29
8 Aug 2026, 00:17109,922first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.8%
avg views ÷ 109,108 subscribers
Avg views / post
66,400
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (19 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total1,261,300
Reactions total14,829
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,710
Videos
104
Links
1,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

14,829 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14,829100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,829reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
68
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 19 we hold a reading for · 84%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alekzz03. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈31,000 views1,610 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chief_chmoPhoto

611 праймов и спящая рука куба☠️☠️☠️

1,610

8 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈44,600 views433 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆BSC Monthly Finals August - EMEA сделать прогноз: https://event.supercell.com/brawlstars будка алекза - подписаться

433

8 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈44,400 views1,310 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

нормально ауры пофармили😻

1,310

6 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈52,700 views401 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆BSC Monthly Finals August - EA сделать прогноз: https://event.supercell.com/brawlstars будка алекза - подписаться

401

6 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈44,000 views231 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

ОБНОВА УЖЕ В ИГРЕ😱ОТКРЫЛ ВСЕ ПРИЗЫ-СМУЗИ И ПОЛУЧИЛ НОВЫЕ СКИНЫ😍 видео уже на канале, открытие новеньких смузи-дропов и новые скинчики ждут вас🤩 поддержите видео лайком и комментарием, приятного просмотра❤️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBuPxqgF8xE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBuPxqgF8xE

231

6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈49,500 views152 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎫 Новый сезон Brawl Pass уже в игре Купить его быстро, дёшево и безопасно можно на моем сайте Supercell Market 🥹 scmarket.cc/go/alekzz 🎫 Brawl Pass - всего 919₽. 🎫 Brawl Pass+ - 1329₽ 🔴ВЫГОДНЕЕ ВСЕГО При покупке вы получите гарантированные награды и бонусы от меня на сайте 🥹 Покупаем на моем сайте Supercell Market Зарегистрироваться можно удобно через ✈️ Telegram или ✉️ Email scmarket.cc/go/alekzz

152

5 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC≈50,700 views1,670 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

мужики зашли размяться, снесли нас без шансов😕

1,670

1 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈75,600 views335 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩 ПИНЫ Matcherino ВЕРНУЛИСЬ СО СКИДКОЙ 50% 🤩 🤩 Matcherino Спайк 🎁 Matcherino Мэнди Теперь пины доставляются на ваш аккаунт автоматически без лишних действий ⚡️ 🏪 Купить можно на моем сайте в разделе "Акции" и получить эксклюзивные награды от меня за покупку ➡️ https://scmarket.cc/go/alekzz ⬅️

335

30 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC≈78,000 views347 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026

КАК Я АПНУЛ 600000 КУБКОВ😱ЭТО МИРОВОЙ РЕКОРД🤩 видео уже на канале, мировой рекорд поставлен, вы не можете такое пропустить🤩 поддержите лайком и комментарием, приятного просмотра❤️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Loq934Fnkps https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Loq934Fnkps

347

29 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC≈82,700 views1,850 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

добиваем? будка алекза - подписаться

1,850

28 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC≈86,800 views1,520 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

буся аура. стрим будет скоро

1,520

26 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC≈88,400 views324 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

АПНУЛ САМЫХ СЛАБЫХ БРАВЛЕРОВ НА ТРЕТИЙ ПРАЙМ😱297000 КУБКОВ🏆 видео уже на канале, поддержите лайком и комментарием. приятного просмотра❤️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMq6ujLUqwQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMq6ujLUqwQ

324

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alekzz03. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 409,207 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BEZSMERTNY 💍
@bezsmertny_bs · 286,785
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
Rost Lairs
@Rost_Lairs · 265,914
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
Robzi
@RobziTG · 177,331
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Нулс Бравл | Нуллс
@nulls_ru · 656,824
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 August 2026
Бубсер | Бравл Старс
@bubser_bs · 209,120
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
Playerok
@playerok · 546,872
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
Brawl Stars Datamines | BSD
@bsdatamines · 480,063
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 August 2026
Мир Supercell
@mir_supercell · 2,591,952
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“будка алекза” (@alekzz03), 109,108 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alekzz03.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.