Channel
@guangzhou1728
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,162subscribers
+915 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003784618884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guangzhou1728 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guangzhou1728 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 7,162 | +267 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 6,895 | +354 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 6,541 | +241 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 6,300 | +53 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 6,247 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (22 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,739 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】： @qianya168 【验证留名】：zzz 【验证时间】：2026年8月9日 【所在位置】：天河 【颜值评分】：9.5 【身材评分】：9.5 【服务评分】：9.5 【优点缺点】：优点:胸大高颜值嫩妹，服务配合；缺点:皮肤有点粗糙，不够光滑 【推荐程度】：9.5 【个人发挥】：二刷芊雅老师。两个群抽奖都没抽中，令人遗憾，但是本人依然pp出击。约了头课，一起上楼，芊雅老师还是一样可爱。闲聊一会后洗澡，感觉胸又变大了，依然是洁癖行为，洗得非常干净。🐍起手，比之前🐍的更主动深入了，口活也变久了，并且比以前含的更深了。戴套开干，姿势配合，正常出货。休息中闲聊，然后开始第二发。第二发有点久，依然配合，最后愉快出货。整个过程很有女友感，喘息声随冲刺速度很有变化。有群友问老师皮肤，确实不是白皮，正常黄皮，够看够用！
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：@jdjdb258 【验证留名】：嘻嘻啊哈 【验证时间】：8.4 【所在位置】：海珠 【颜值评分】：10 【身材评分】：10 【服务评分】：10 【优点缺点】：没有缺点 【推荐程度】：10 【个人发挥】：之前慧慧酱搬了科室去荔湾太远了，现在搬到海珠，直接一个约起，见面还是熟悉的感觉，化的妆也比之前好看多了，交了水费直接来个水中萧口爆，上次没有体验的都体验了，后续床上换了个情趣内衣，还是婚纱那样的，有个白色头纱，看着我的新娘，猛烈进攻然后释放，没的说，直接给榨干了，看来要一个月不出击才能恢复了
❤1
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：@liuruyan03 【验证留名】：没有脚的小鸟 【验证时间】：7.31 【所在位置】：天河客运站 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：8（🐻C、黄黑皮） 【服务评分】：8（嫩妹三件套) 【优点缺点】：优点漂亮，缺点瘦一些 【推荐程度】：推荐 【个人发挥】：第二次去了，老师的颜值不错，微微黑一些，胸很大，微下垂，我是颜狗，漂亮老师我都喜欢，上次见面可能隔了十来天，上次让老师秒了，这次回来我是报仇来的，常规操作，交水费洗澡，上床，口硬，我放弃一切繁文缛节，不要老师穿战衣，不要老师波推一切服务，口硬戴套就开战，我主动出击，压老师在身下，传教开始，在我冲击下，床吱呀直响，老师唔嘴说，松掉了螺丝，床松太响了，让我轻点，怕隔壁听到，那怎么过瘾，我把老师抱下床，让老师扒在床边，后入，双手抓住双乳，在后面冲刺，没有响声，做得投入，终于成功出货，累得…
❤1
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：可可 @telas4459620 【验证留名】：渡川 【验证时间】：2026.7.30 【所在位置】：#佛山 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：9 【优点缺点】：优点:活泼可爱，有肉，听话配合，情绪价值 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】： 非常可爱的一个女孩，不像是北方女孩，有点像南方姑娘，温温柔柔的，不太爱说话，但是很听你的，人很好，服务不是很会，我也不太会，哈哈，去之前就聊过几次了，这次呢也不算陌生，先是语言上交流然后身体也开始互相交流，给的情绪价值也高，也不会催你，可惜距离我太远了，如果在这边，周周去也是没有问题的，性价比超级无敌好，比我在上海遇到的好多了，一千多一次，居然还卡我时间，课表写四十五分钟，我进门就开始卡时间了，一点聊天了解的时间都不给你。宝藏女孩强烈推荐。
❤1
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：小蛋卷 @Xdanjuan 【验证留名】：Jimmy仔 【验证时间】：2026.7.30 【所在位置】：#白云区 【颜值评分】：8.5 【身材评分】：8.5 【服务评分】：8.5 【优点缺点】：优点:活泼可爱，有肉不胖，听话配合，情绪价值高。缺点:偷懒没化妆，结束才告诉我有新战衣。 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：小蛋卷回归头课预约出击，来过很多次了驾轻就熟，去到楼下提醒小蛋卷别睡了出来开门。进入课室果然不出所料还在房间里躺着，而且还是裸睡，二话不说我也脱了衣服钻进被窝里抱着小蛋卷休息了一阵。休息后在床上先是语言上交流然后身体也开始互相交流，情绪到位后拉着小懒猪一起去冲洗。小蛋卷洗得很认完全不用自己动手，我只管吃豆腐就行。冲洗过后回来床上，都是18禁内容我就不详细说了。小蛋卷依然敏感水多三点粉，回归后头课相当紧致，包裹感特别舒服，🐻…
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：可可 【验证留名】: 广东冠希哥 【验证时间】：2026/7.30 【所在位置】：桂城 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：9 【优点缺点】：b 紧包裹感很强 🐻圆润坚挺 有符文 服务欠缺待提高 床上反馈很顶 【推荐程度】：非常推荐 【个人发挥】：有个妹妹找我约，之前鸽了我两次，我同意了这是最后一次，没想到又鸽了，转头找了收藏已久的可可，进门妹妹较小可爱，人照9成，妹妹活不多，交完水费一起沐浴上床，口活一般，然后女上进去很紧，妹妹动一下叫一下，她爽我也爽，🐻圆润坚挺手感很好，皮肤很紧致光滑很嫩，换后入妹妹叫的更厉害了，屁股很翘，后背线条很有美感，搞了几下快忍不住换了传教士，一边🐍一边冲123完事儿
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：芷沫 @xiaojin174 【验证留名】：啵啵坤 【验证时间】：7.30 【所在位置】：番禺 【颜值评分】：9 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：7 【优点缺点】：颜值高，腿长，身材好，下面粉粉，缺点不让亲，不是不🐍，碰嘴巴都没有 【推荐程度】：8 【个人发挥】：地方也是知名景点（楼下的包子不要吃，5块钱一个还很普通），地铁步行过来有点远，所幸没迟太久，遥控上楼，看到一个美女，老师是湖南妹子，之前在东莞过来，颜值不错，腿比较长匀称，上半身短下半身长，肩膀也宽，熊也不小b+，问我要不要一起洗，我说不用了，我要洗头发，下雨过来淋了点雨，然后来到床上，当时可能也是比较久，也可以六九，里面比较粉，就是实在是不太熟练，嫩妹也是这样，口的比较久，不太会女上，那就让我来了，腿很长，可以扛在肩膀上，皮肤不是很滑，一进去就感觉我比较烫，感觉还是不错的…
❤1
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：芷沫 【验证留名】：嘻嘻啊哈 【验证时间】：7.30 【所在位置】：番禺 【颜值评分】：10 【身材评分】：9 【服务评分】：8 【优点缺点】：嫩妹有的都可以有，没的基本也没 【推荐程度】：9 【个人发挥】：约了老师的课后就准备出发，结果后续老师推迟了时间在商场等待了两个小时，后续到了科室看到老师一身清纯装扮，白色短袖加高腰牛仔裤，衬托的老师有一条大长腿，脸上的妆也不算差，加了水费后一起去洗澡，老师洗的也很认真。洗完去到床上直接开始口，看到口硬了就打算戴套开始，老师的下面也很漂亮，粉嫩粉嫩的，十足的嫩妹小穴，虽然肚子上有点肉，但也不影响，进去之后紧的很啊，就是老师表情不变有点洋娃娃的感觉，嘴上跟老师交谈，得知一直如此可能是性冷淡，但是小穴里的水是骗不了人，水汪汪的感觉我鸡儿都要滑出来了，后面也是传教士出水了，躺着摸了下老师，老师还是…
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：乐盈 @ggbbiii 【验证留名】：菠萝 【验证时间】：7.29 【所在位置】：天河 【颜值评分】：7 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：7 【优点缺点】：优点：身材很好，白皮，皮肤嫩。 缺点：服务不太多，口的不深 【推荐程度】：7.5 【个人发挥】：中了半价，约了老师头课。因为酒店的房间还没收拾出来，我和老师都罚站了一会。整个过程老师都在积极沟通，虽然罚站，但是也不能怪老师。老师是经典的皮肤很白，也很嫩，见面寒暄了几句开始进入正题。 老师会帮忙洗澡，洗的也很认真，还帮忙擦身子，也是比较体贴了。 嫩妹的标准服务，戴套步入正题。老师的女上很厉害，节奏感很强也很持久，差点给老师123了。后面换了几个动作，老师都很耐心，没有催，好评好评！ 总体来说还是很不错的体验，身材和皮肤都很不错。推荐！
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：欣欣 @xingxing26888 【验证留名】：一个好人 【验证时间】：7.28 【所在位置】：番禺 【颜值评分】：8 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：9 【优点缺点】：老师态度非常好，很好沟通，综合各方面还行，下次粉可以少点 哈哈哈 【推荐程度】：8 【个人发挥】：有幸中老师半价，果断出击，出击过程有点小崎岖，刚好半路鸽子了一个插队上车，“跋山涉水”打车30多分钟到楼下，遥控轻松上门，刚见老师，能对上眼水费上缴出击，老师站起来后还真的挺高，我不需要啥服务，看老师不舒服就要求主动了，老师乖乖躺着，还有处理一下不舒服的眼睛，看到老师一直弄眼睛，各种难受，心疼老师，途中脚跪麻了换了一次姿势，过程中也和老师聊的挺愉快，顺利出水…祝老师越做越好😆
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：可可 【验证留名】：阿布 【验证时间】：2026.7.28 【所在位置】：佛山 【颜值评分】：8.5 【身材评分】：8 【服务评分】：8 【优点缺点】：优点:嫰妹，粉嫩敏感，🐻挺立不下垂，听话配合 缺点:有点小肚子 【推荐程度】：8.3 【个人发挥】：还是嫩妹，阿布就是专吃嫩妹，一进门科室环境简陋了一点，可可老师穿的jk+黑丝格外诱人，然后速速洗澡开拍开插，可可老师虽然颜值没有十分惊艳，但却有着一对挺拔的奶子，逼外看有些深棕色但是掰开一开内部却十分粉嫩，摸一摸咪咪就立起来了，并且在深入洞穴后时不时会夹你一下，后入比传教士更紧，阿布后入不久后就有感觉了差点交代出来于是马上换回传教士射出浓厚的一发（阿布拍摄过程有专门的调肤色的补光灯所以和实际看起来可能会没有视频那么白亮）观看后续更多精彩内容可以关注阿布 @abuzabiww 🤓
广州佛山报告： https://t.me/+d2VfZXpstac2OGE1 【妹子花名】：小鱼 【验证留名】：E300L 【验证时间】：7.28 【所在位置】：顺德 【颜值评分】：9.1 【身材评分】：9.1 【服务评分】：8.9 【优点缺点】： 优点：对版嫩妹 缺点：班味有点重 【推荐程度】：8.9 【个人发挥】：刷到合眼缘的小鱼（@guolai13874）老师，频道动态说明天开始红休，担心错过赶紧提前私信约好时间。由于路上堵迟到了一小会，到地方后按小鱼指引上楼进门，看到和频道里九六成像的高个嫩妹，寒暄几句后满意的付款搞起。一起脱光去洗，小鱼帮洗的比较认真，就是互动少了点🥲。擦干后躺着享受小鱼的口活，嫩妹的微微浅口，摸着粉嫩的C胸，二弟很快高高立起；换我推倒小鱼头埋在她双腿间嗦小豆豆，浅褐色的鲍鱼在舔舐下早就湿漉漉咯。戴帽传教士挺进，滚烫紧致的感觉一阵一阵袭来，混合着小鱼轻轻的呻吟声，终是在后入时畅快出货。事后洗完，看…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @guangzhou1728. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 261,062 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州佛山报告频道（仅供参考）” (@guangzhou1728), 7,162 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guangzhou1728.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.