休假一段时间 开课在通知

Channel
小萝莉🎀琪琪 🐍💋 cos jk 甜妹
@beibiebaby
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
6,961subscribers
+581 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002426690042 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beibiebaby |
| Description | 🎁 https://ttt.tg/@beibiebaby/gift |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beibiebaby |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 12:07 | 6,961 | +393 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:15 | 6,568 | +83 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:11 | 6,485 | -493 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:01 | 6,978 | +383 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 6,595 | +401 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 6,194 | -18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 6,212 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 6,216 | -17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 6,233 | -7 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 21:41 | 6,240 | -33 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 6,273 | -16 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 6,289 | -52 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 6,341 | -31 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 6,372 | -34 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 6,406 | +26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:25 | 6,380 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 6,380 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 1 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.79%
- avg views ÷ 6,961 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 612
- 38 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.078%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 41
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (1 November 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 23,260 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 00:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,280
- Videos
- ≈170
- Links
- ≈155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】琪琪 【联系方式】@kissbeibei 【所在位置】荔湾区 【验证留名】灰色酷猫 【验证时间】2026年11月 10 日 【修车费用】p 【颜值身材】10 【服务内容】10 【服务态度】10 【优点缺点】人照一致,萝莉型,身材玲珑有致,女友感强,体验感满满, 【推荐程度】10 【体验细节】 约好时间提前到达,开门琪琪淡颜甜妹风格,黑长直齐刘海很有日系JK的感觉,眉眼柔和,妆容清透,整体氛围软萌。人照一致,整的我都紧张不淡定起来,但是琪琪貌似显得游刃有余,会打破僵局闲聊下,热情递水拖鞋,房间布置都是些小女生的衣服和装饰,像参观女友雅致的卧室吧,琪琪身材挺有料,有 b 胸有肉臀,身子软乎乎,手感很好,一次性用品很到位,主动 jk 制服,诱惑力满满,蛇下就旁琪琪发挥,无齿感口活棒,然后传教起手,感受到琪琪里面的温热和紧度,看看琪琪精致脸庞边抽插很有感觉…
q
有空了 可上门
Posted without readable text
有空了 可上门
有空了
今天评价
小萝莉琪琪 有科室可上门 正常开课:2点开课 头课在 联系入口:@kissbeibei 双向入口:@kissbeibei_bot
上门合拍 有空了
昨晚的评价
今天头课评价
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @beibiebaby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @beibiebaby as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 9.3 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 4
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@GZNMHEJI · 25,1953 posts广州修车无忧学府
@xcwyxf · 39,1713 posts广州修车无忧学府榜
@xcwyxfb · 55,5912 posts广州嫩妹名探甄选
@GZMNzhenxuan · 29,5751 post广州嫩妹榜【备胎】
@gznmbtb · 15,7661 post广州嫩妹名探【重生榜】
@GZNMMTB · 115,4041 post广州嫩妹备用府
@GZnmmtccf · 14,2041 post广州嫩妹名探【重生府】
@GZNMMTFU · 79,0321 post广州佛山嫩妹名探公开社
@GZnmmtgks · 6,4561 post广州修车无忧甄选
@gzxcwyxfzx · 26,1291 post广州修车无忧学府报告
@xcwyxfbg · 38,6691 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小萝莉🎀琪琪 🐍💋 cos jk 甜妹” (@beibiebaby), 6,961 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beibiebaby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.