寻会开企业支付宝的大哥,求流程。有懂的直接联系 @xia_oLi 。红包学费都可安排

Channel
光支付通知频道🎺自营一手渠道 招私盘 集团 包网 大四方
@guangying2222333
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
628subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001493216831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @guangying2222333 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/guangying2222333 |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 628 | +5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 623 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 621 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.7%
- avg views ÷ 628 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 168
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (21 April 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 503 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
寻会开企业支付宝的大哥,求流程。有懂的直接联系 @xia_oLi 。红包学费都可安排
寻会开企业支付宝的大哥,求流程。有懂的直接联系 @xia_oLi 。红包学费都可安排
宇宙代付 光一般的速度 用过的都说好 内测期间 各大团长,都可联系白白拿测试周卡
长期大量收青年地。保纯bc量,随时查看流水记录。 长期收真机技术,仅个人打,绝不传播。有的联系 @xia_oLi
收代开 淘宝千牛技术 报价来
收代开 淘宝千牛技术 报价来
收代开 淘宝千牛技术 报价来
#加量通知 UID/金条通道已全部优化 ‼️成率高,码子嘎嘎足‼️烦请各位老板加加量,拉拉权重‼️ UID/金条通道已全部优化 ‼️成率高,码子嘎嘎足‼️烦请各位老板加加量,拉拉权重‼️ UID/金条通道已全部优化 ‼️成率高,码子嘎嘎足‼️烦请各位老板加加量,拉拉权重‼️ UID/金条通道已全部优化 ‼️成率高,码子嘎嘎足‼️烦请各位老板加加量,拉拉权重‼️ UID/金条通道已全部优化 ‼️成率高,码子嘎嘎足‼️烦请各位老板加加量,拉拉权重‼️
来个白户带执照的兄弟跑进件 有的联系光影
关于鼎晟曝光我方我们没任何推诿卡的就是他 绝对不会向黑势力低头。 起因就是极讯介绍鼎晟来跑下发说担保 然极讯于4月30号跑路我方8900 我们于5月5日发现不给鼎晟下发PS:欠鼎晟的绝对没极讯欠我们的多 有合作的自行评判是我们靠谱还是鼎晟靠谱 在此不再做过多无畏的口舌 极讯地址:TT3BWgD8gfch19RkLd6ot1oSeZowHeuaDv 鼎晟地址:TRPEPbKuX4j4TfsBn8hjTyZQU6jdGdoNm6 👤 8350870588 👦🏻 派大星 (人在海南打雪仗) 🌐 @JXdd_1 🕑 最後同步時間 21/04/2026 👤 7857526432 👦🏻 极讯运营 小讯 🌐 @jixun998 🕑 最後同步時間 09/04/2026 👤 7644362924 👦🏻 极迅 小丫 🌐 @jixun5613 🕑 最後同步時間 06/05/2026 👤 7862576382 👦🏻 极讯负责人-薇薇 🌐 @mz70…
flow是清晨的烟幕 我满腹经纶的宣布 内涵和精神的兼顾 像挂满星辰的天幕 把押韵倾盆地编入 歌词像精纯的仙术 给所有听闻的新人 展示我惊人的天赋 让人窒息赞赏 faker发配去他乡 像刺激战场 劳资八倍镜压枪 把他们加倍驱杀光 在那些青铜输掉前 我们年轻有为 自古英雄出少年 .
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @guangying2222333. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“光支付通知频道🎺自营一手渠道 招私盘 集团 包网 大四方” (@guangying2222333), 628 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guangying2222333.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.