Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 乖乖的朋友圈👙

Channel

乖乖的朋友圈👙

@guaiguaieee066

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

732subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004466187136
TypeChannel
Username@guaiguaieee066
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 22 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/guaiguaieee066

Growth

72073272613 Sept 2026, 12:47 — 720 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 13:22 — 720 subscribers14 Sept 2026, 08:37 — 732 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 12:4714 Sept 2026, 08:37
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 718–734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 08:37732+12
13 Sept 2026, 13:22720no change
13 Sept 2026, 12:47720first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
128.8%
avg views ÷ 732 subscribers
Avg views / post
943
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.162%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held18 (22 August 202613 September 2026)
Views total12,253
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1090.9%
😎19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,030 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @XiaomengGroupBot

【编号】:2611 【时间】:2026-08-29 【状态】:已发布 【留名】:Xander 【老师】:乖乖 【评级】:好评 【综合】:9.38 【人照】:9.5 【颜值】:9.2 【身材】:9.4 【服务】:9.8 【态度】:9.6 【环境】:8.8 【过程】:所谓念念不忘,必有回响,所以今儿二刷啦,逮着个能刺激我荷尔蒙的嫩妹这事儿一点都不奇怪,二刷明显熟很多,一人一根烟畅聊扯淡就花了不少时间,出击是目的,但也不是生活的全部,过程不表,状态一般,天天熬夜的彭于晏今天只能变成小本子片里无奈的丈夫了,出击返程的路上想想生活和出击可能大抵是一样的归途,满是不确定,也许是惊喜也许是恐吓。虽然我指甲不算短,毕竟我不是孙哥,乖乖也没有要我磨了指甲才准摸,所以就像张鹤伦导师说的一样,碰到个女生不要你车不要你房,不要你的包包,不要你陪她吃饭看电影,却能让你摸陪你睡,这样的女生四五百贵么,我觉得是值的,哈哈🤣

5

29 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC882 viewsread 13 September 2026

【时间】:2026-08-28 【老师】:乖乖 【留名】:上杉风太郎 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.67 【过程】:第一次在飞机上约课 体验感很好 进门先坐会妹子会主动给你递水 坐一会就开始洗澡 妹子身材属于那种娇小行的 后续就开始战斗了 太久没玩了 第一发有些快了 结束战斗后休息一下 进入第二发战斗大战一场后发现出不来后面让妹子口了会洗个澡坐会就撤离了 总体感受很舒服 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

28 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC792 viewsread 13 September 2026

【时间】:2026-08-28 【老师】:乖乖 【留名】:Vyane 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:7 【综合】:8.67 【过程】:挺嫩的妹子,乳头是凹陷的还没发育成熟,吸一口又上来了,下面粉粉的没异味很好吃。服务都有,传教士,后入,抱起来干各种姿势都很配合。喜欢嫩妹的完全可以冲。 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

26 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC946 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026

【时间】:2026-08-26 【老师】:乖乖 【留名】:Xander 【人照】:9.8 【颜值】:9.6 【身材】:8.8 【服务】:9.5 【态度】:9.5 【环境】:8.5 【综合】:9.28 【过程】:也整不懂最近的圈子是咋滴了,极品漏街无人识,代聊p图满天飞,默认多年不好评了,实话实说,今天的出击本来没报啥希望的,原因是跟乖乖的前期沟通有点错位了,我时间没确定一直在聊她,整的她还以为我是眼子,还好按时出击了,面一见,嚯,开眼了,不虚此行,小小一只,人照对比真的是只能说年轻小妹子把自己拍丑了,服务没得说,说话声音也小小的,腔调也甜甜的,过程不表,光谷彭于晏没有写H文潜质,最最主要的,入户双层夹啊,来感觉的时候还把我抱的紧紧的,还能再升级来个plus版本,体验感满分,三层夹怎么夹都好用,怎么夹都🛫,过程中还有体感反馈,不是老演员那种赶场呻吟,只能说之前出击过的狼友们吃的太好了,赶脚得安利一波,什么叫性价比之王,朋友们,不信

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @guaiguaieee066. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“乖乖的朋友圈👙” (@guaiguaieee066), 732 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guaiguaieee066.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.