Channel
@gsJ6q1oJSxljMjdk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,525subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001957329777 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gsJ6q1oJSxljMjdk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gsJ6q1oJSxljMjdk |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 1,525 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 1,522 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 1,519 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 1,518 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 1,512 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 1,516 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 1,514 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 1,512 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1,510 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 1,509 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 1,508 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 1,499 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 1,495 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,496 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
123 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 68.3% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 30.9% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مقتطفات من الموضوع (الجزء الثاني من أدب التواصل الرقمي): 📱 في زمنٍ أصبحت فيه المجموعات مجالس، والرسائل مخاطبات؛ يبقى الأدب هو الأدب، ويبقى للكلمة المكتوبة أثرها وحسابها. 🔹 أولًا: في الرسائل… قل ما عندك جملة عامل رسائل الواتساب معاملة المراسلات والمخاطبات، لا معاملة الاتصالات. في الاتصال تسلِّم وتنتظر، ثم تسأل عن الحال وتنتظر… أما في الرسالة: 💡 سلِّم، واذكر غرضك مختصرًا، ولا تجعل كل جملة رسالةً مستقلة. 🔹 ثانيً…
❤2
File, posted without a caption
❤2
🎙️ برنامج هدي المصطفى ﷺ للاستماع للحلقة الرابعة كاملةً: هدي النبي ﷺ في التعامل مع الأزمات (الجزء الأول) كيف كان النبي ﷺ يتعامل مع الأزمات حين تنزل؟ وكيف كان يفكر ويعمل داخلها؟ في هذه الحلقة نتوقف مع ثلاثة محاور: هل تدل كثرة الابتلاءات على شقاء صاحبها أو ضعف منزلته عند الله؟ إلى من كان يلجأ النبي ﷺ إذا اشتدت به الكروب؟ وكيف كان ركونه إلى ربه وتعلقه به؟ كيف جمع ﷺ بين كمال التوكل على الله، وكمال الأخذ بالأسباب؟ نس…
❤1👍1👏1
هل تدل كثرة الابتلاءات على شقاء صاحبها أو ضعف منزلته عند الله؟!
❤4👍1
من رحمة الله بالعبد أن يحفظه من الطغيان أيها المبتلى… يا من أثقلك المرض، أو أرهقك الهم، أو ضاقت بك الدنيا… هل تأملت أن هذا البلاء قد يكون من أعظم نعم الله عليك؟ قال الله تعالى: ﴿كَلَّآ إِنَّ ٱلْإِنسَٰنَ لَيَطْغَىٰ أَن رَّءَاهُ ٱسْتَغْنَىٰ﴾. إنها سنة من سنن النفوس؛ فالإنسان إذا رأى نفسه مستغنيًا طغى!! ولذلك قد يبتلي الله عبده، لا ليهلكه، ولكن ليحفظ قلبه من الطغيان، ومن أخطر أسبابه: الاستغناء عن الله. حفظك ب…
❤4👍4
أدب التواصل في العصر الرقمي (الجزء الأول) 🎙️ مقتطفات من الموضوع: في زمنٍ أصبحت فيه الهواتف أبوابًا، والرسائل زيارات، والمجموعات مجالس… يذكّرنا الإسلام بأن الأخلاق لا تتغير بتغير الوسائل. 🔹 أولًا: لا تُكثر من الرسائل بحجة الدعوة إلى الله الواتساب نعمة إذا استُعمل في الخير. هدي النبي ﷺ كان التخفف في الموعظة حتى لا يمل الناس. ليست العبرة بكثرة ما ترسل، بل بحسن ما تختار، وصحة ما تنشر، وإعطاء الناس فرصة للانتفاع بما ي…
❤7👍2
File, posted without a caption
❤1
بفضل الله ومنته، أجزت اليوم أخي الطالب محمد بلال في قراءة الإمام عاصم برواية شعبة وبرواية حفص، بعد أن أتم القراءة وأداها على الوجه المعتبر. ومحمد بلال من طلاب حلقات المرحلة الثانوية بمسجد السالمية بجدة، أسأل الله أن يبارك له فيما تعلم، وأن يجعله من أهل القرآن، وأن يجزي والديه خير الجزاء، ويبارك في معلميه وكل من كان سببًا في تعليمه. وهذه مقتطفات من هذا اللقاء المبارك، وأعتذر مقدمًا عن ضعف الصوت قليلًا في بعض المقاطع…
❤18👍2
▫️ العنوان: التكامل المعرفي وأثره في منهج الإمام الماوردي في فقه آيات الأحكام تأصيلا وتطبيقا من خلال كتابه الحاوي ▪️ المؤلف: #علي_بن_أحمد_علي_عسيري ▫️ الناشر: #جامعة_أم_القرى ▪️ تاريخ النشر: 1443هـ 2022م ▫️ بلد النشر: مكة المكرمة، #السعودية ▪️ الطبعة: 1 ▫️ عدد الأجزاء: 1 ▪️ الصفحات: 599 ▫️ نوع الوعاء: #كتاب ▪️ التصنيف الرئيسي: #الفقه_وأصوله ۪
❤4👍4
يستوقف المتأمل مطلعَ سورة غافر، إذ يعرّف الله سبحانه عباده بنفسه. 📖 قال تعالى: ﴿حم تَنزِيلُ ٱلۡكِتَٰبِ مِنَ ٱللَّهِ ٱلۡعَزِيزِ ٱلۡعَلِيمِ غَافِرِ ٱلذَّنۢبِ وَقَابِلِ ٱلتَّوۡبِ شَدِيدِ ٱلۡعِقَابِ ذِي ٱلطَّوۡلِۖ لَآ إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَۖ إِلَيۡهِ ٱلۡمَصِيرُ﴾. تأمل هذا الترتيب البديع ✨ بدأ سبحانه بصفة ﴿غَافِرِ ٱلذَّنۢبِ﴾، ثم أتبعها بقوله: ﴿وَقَابِلِ ٱلتَّوۡبِ﴾، وهما صفتان تفتحان للعبد باب القرب من ربه، وتدعوانه …
❤12
https://youtu.be/YE7ezZKPAJ8?si=NHAk9WWP_401uWr_
❤4👍2
فلسفة الإسلام في التعامل مع فكرة الموت (الجزء الثاني)
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gsJ6q1oJSxljMjdk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة د.علي عسيري” (@gsJ6q1oJSxljMjdk), 1,525 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gsJ6q1oJSxljMjdk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.