Channel
@gryaznoezerkalo_live
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
290subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001140838083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gryaznoezerkalo_live |
| Created | Between 1 June 2016 and 31 January 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gryaznoezerkalo_live |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 290 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 287 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 288 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 288 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👀 | 11 | 23.4% | |
| custom 5249011486721848132 | 10 | 21.3% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5235807206770750407 | 6 | 12.8% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5199610880257435665 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| custom 5440474033491560675 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
пиндосы не скрывают зависти к нашему Байкалу а вообще, прикол не понял. инста спустя несколько месяцев решила, что мои байкальские фотокарточки - про *роскомнадзор* и/или расстройство пищевого поведения
😁4👎1custom 52490114867218481321
боль SMMщика - «технические работы» в сервисе аналитики, когда тебе надо собрать статистику и закрыть месяц…
👀4😢2custom 52490114867218481321
внезапно оказался на тайском фестивале в московском саду Эрмитаж на сайте писали: с 31 июля по 2 августа сад «Эрмитаж» на три дня превратится в уголок Таиланда - с его красками, ароматами, музыкой и гостеприимством. фестиваль объединит культуру, искусство и образование, чтобы показать творчество между поколениями и странами в программе: • выступления музыкальных и танцевальных коллективов из ведущих университетов …
custom 51996108802574356652👍1custom 52358072067707504071custom 54404740334915606751
повёлся на маркетинг и остался с ощущением, что меня заскамили залетели с половинкой в Senti Menti - у них форсится сезонное меню с лисичками, стало интересно. взяли попробовать три позиции из трёх… и это было печально - до такой степени, что одно блюдо убрали из чека • пицца - спасибо, но в додо вкуснее, ей богу. мелкая, пресная, грибы как варёные, а подача неаккуратная. за 800₽ можно бы и чуть лучше постараться •…
👀7custom 52358072067707504075custom 52490114867218481325😢1
когда остановится масштабная «том-ямизация»? том-ям повсюду - в салатах, горячих блюдах, чипсах, чебупелях, сухариках и снеках, соусах и маринадах, пицце, роллах, пельменях, дегидрированных супах, колбасках для гриля, блинах, замороженной итальянской пасте, консервированном тунце и даже полуготовых улитках… осталось дождаться появления сезонных том-ямовых булок в Синнабоне повсюду мозолит глаз что-то со вкусом кисл…
😁4custom 52490114867218481323😢2👍1🦄1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @gryaznoezerkalo_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Санёчек Морозов” (@gryaznoezerkalo_live), 290 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gryaznoezerkalo_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.