Vote for MRG Migration & Relaunch 🗳
- Yes ✅ (i vote for migration)79%
- No 🚫 (i don't want any changes)21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤13❤🔥4🤩3🤯2🥰2

Channel
@grmdrop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
93,454subscribers
+86,395 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002455440972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grmdrop |
| Description | 📰 GramDrop News 🚀 Your source for the latest TON, Crypto, Airdrops & Telegram updates. 💎 |
| Created | 23 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grmdrop |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 93,454 | -611 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 94,065 | -482 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 94,547 | -498 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:55 | 95,045 | -620 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 95,665 | -429 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:45 | 96,094 | -517 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 96,611 | -860 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 97,471 | -674 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:29 | 98,145 | -541 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:14 | 98,686 | -866 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:14 | 99,552 | -701 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:21 | 100,253 | -753 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 101,006 | -659 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 101,665 | -974 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 102,639 | -1,409 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 104,048 | -6,235 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 11:01 | 110,283 | +40,620 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 69,663 | +51,508 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 18,155 | +2,908 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 15,247 | first reading |
89 posts held, back to 23 February 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 89 (23 February 2025 – 28 October 2026) |
| Views total | 785,248 |
| Reactions total | 32,979 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Oct 2026, 01:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45,519 reactions across 88 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22,821 | 50.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4,189 | 9.20% | |
| 🥰 | 4,020 | 8.83% | |
| 🍾 | 1,997 | 4.39% | |
| 🤝 | 1,963 | 4.31% | |
| 😘 | 1,398 | 3.07% | |
| 🤯 | 1,382 | 3.04% | |
| custom 5280909873821822720 | 1,151 | 2.53% | |
| 💯 | 1,090 | 2.39% | |
| 🍓 | 1,058 | 2.32% | |
| 😍 | 1,026 | 2.25% | |
| 🤩 | 922 | 2.03% | |
| 💘 | 913 | 2.01% | |
| 🤗 | 834 | 1.83% | |
| custom 6026135408901889022 | 465 | 1.02% | |
| 🏆 | 290 | 0.637% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2025 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grmdrop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 89 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 February 2025 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Vote for MRG Migration & Relaunch 🗳
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤13❤🔥4🤩3🤯2🥰2
☝️ Victor’s Company Just Added 2 New Earning Tasks! If you’re earning VIC, don’t miss this update! ✈️ Victor’s Company has introduced two new tasks for the community: ✅ Add Your Name ⭐ Complete Your Daily Story Task 🪙 Complete the tasks and earn VIC rewards! Don’t wait until later — jump in, complete your tasks, and keep stacking VIC. Every task counts! ⚡ ✈️ Start Earning Now: @VictorsCompanyBot
❤15🥰11❤🔥4🏆3🤯2
MRG is growing stronger — 28,000+ on-chain holders and counting. A growing holder base is a milestone worth watching. The community continues to expand, and MRG is steadily building its presence on TON. This is just the beginning. Let’s see what comes next. Verify the on-chain holders: https://tonviewer.com/EQDj-zlSvj4Au154XjsU7ATzt13p8JjYEs0weVv1rVbCJSn0?section=holders
❤25🥰7💘5🤯4❤🔥2🍾1
🥂 MRG MINER TASK REWARDS INCREASED TO NEARLY 3X! ⛏️ ❤️ Your daily tasks just got more rewarding! Earn nearly 3X higher rewards and make the most of this opportunity. 🏳️ Complete tasks and claim your FREE DAILY $MRG! ⚡ Don’t miss out — jump into MRG Miner and start earning today! Start Mining: @mrgminerbot
❤42🤝8❤🔥6🤩4🍾2💯2🤗2😍1
🚀 VIC PUMPS AGAIN! 💎 The momentum is building, and Victor’s Company ($VIC) is back in the spotlight! 📈 The chart is moving, the community is watching, and the journey continues. Are you ready for the next move? 🚀 🪙 Token: $VIC — Victor’s Company 📎 View VIC Token: https://tonviewer.com/EQClb4h8Wnqx-X_sKMFExqxcQusCktlMHxYZ2M80A_WnnFUe 💱 Trade $VIC on STON.fi and follow the market! 📍Clock in at @VictorsCompanyBot Y…
❤48🤝8❤🔥6🤯5💘3🥰3🍓1😍1
Which one do you currently hold?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤31🤩9❤🔥6🤯6💘3
🚀 VIC Hits $20K in Total Liquidity! 💎 ⛏️ Miners, another milestone for Victor’s Company! Our total liquidity has reached $20,000, and the VIC price is showing signs of recovery. 📈 🔥 Your Chance to Grab a Genesis NFT! Get your Victor Unleashed NFT at a discounted price on Getgems and take advantage of the limited-time task rewards of 50 VIC per task for one week! 💎 Secure your NFT today: https://getgems.io/collect…
❤53❤🔥8🤯8🏆5💘5
⚒️ VICTOR’S COMPANY — AUTOPAY UPDATE 📣 Withdrawal & Security Notice ✅ Our new Autopay system automatically reviews pending withdrawals for suspicious activity. Eligible withdrawals will be processed in the next run. ❗️ Withdrawals may be rejected for inactive referrals, paid referrals, or suspicious multi-account farming. 💎 0.05 GRAM Fee: Mining is free! This fee is only for on-chain verification. ⏰️ Processing …
❤51💯15🤯9🥰4🤩2😘2💘1
💎 VICTOR UNLEASHED NFT COLLECTION VERIFIED! ✅ 🚀 Our NFT collection has received a verification badge on TON Viewer, confirming its recognized on-chain collection identity. 🔍 Verify here: https://tonviewer.com/EQCUnrf-3yZwDEaanuXDtzFtqNWqKdQ1saAUD7rkyCtiNKFY?section=overview ⛏️ Join @VictorsCompanyBot and start your foreman journey today!
❤41❤🔥8🍾5🥰4🤯3😘2🍓1💘1
👋 JUST RECEIVED 5,700 $VIC! 💰 🔥 5,700 VIC = $23.98! ✅ Real Payouts. Real Rewards. ⛏️ Start mining, earn $VIC, and claim your share! 🚀 Join the Mining Revolution Today!
❤🔥41❤19😍10🤯8😘5🍾4🤩3🍓1
📈 $VIC SURPASSES 7,000 ONCHAIN HOLDERS! Another major milestone for Victor’s Company! A huge thank you to our growing community for your incredible support and trust. 👀 With Deep Mine, Victor Unleashed NFTs, daily VIC rewards, and more exciting gaming utilities ahead, we’re just getting started. Our mission is to keep expanding the ecosystem and delivering more value to our miners and holders. 📍Clock in at @Victor…
❤🔥37💯13❤9🏆6🤯5🤝3🤩3🍓2
🚀 $VIC — $40K IN 24H TRADING VOLUME! The VIC community keeps moving forward! 💎 📊 24H Volume: $40K 🪙 Token Price: $0.004228 🏦 Market Cap: $21.1M Every step counts. We're building momentum, growing our community, and pushing forward together! 📈 ⚡️ MINE $VIC | HOLD $VIC | TRADE $VIC The journey continues. Stay focused, stay bullish, and keep building! 🚀 DYOR. Crypto markets are volatile. 📈Explore Now - STON.fi ▶…
❤70🍓10🤯9🤝8❤🔥4💘3💯3🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @grmdrop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@grmdrop edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Vote for MRG Migration & Relaunch 🗳
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which one do you currently hold?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How many Victor’s Unleashed NFTs do you hold? 👀
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 VOTE NOW! ⬇️ Are you waiting for the Victor Unleashed NFT Mint?
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How many Genesis NFTs do you hold? 👀
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If you are eligible, how many NFT you will mint?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2025 to 28 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GramDrop News” (@grmdrop), 93,454 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grmdrop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.