Channel
@grishaleyba
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002853950303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grishaleyba |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grishaleyba |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 160 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 159 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 161 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 159 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 159 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
265 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 30.9% | |
| 🔥 | 59 | 22.3% | |
| 😁 | 44 | 16.6% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 14.0% | |
| 🍌 | 19 | 7.17% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 3.77% | |
| 🤪 | 10 | 3.77% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В редакцию Саша Родионов ездил на УАЗе (капризная бэха его заманала, купил УАЗ). На том же УАЗе мы как-то поехали работать митинг навальнистов у Дворца Спорта. На том же УАЗе Саша — уже один — поехал дежурить к ментовке, когда самых активных повыдёргивали из толпы. Либералом он не был (эпитетов для них тоже не жалел). Он был журналистом. Если где-то творилась или могла твориться несправедливость — он был там. Конеч…
❤13👍2
За неделю по огрызку от «Яблока» проехались лидеры всех четырех парламентских оппозиционных партий. Антирейтинг Зюганова — 44% (ВЦИОМ, 2026). Слуцкого — 36%. Миронова — 34%. Нечаева — 20%. Учитывая пересечение множеств, которого тут математически не может не быть, минимальный совокупный антирейтинг этих ораторов — около 50%. Проще говоря, их заявления вертела на хую как минимум половина дорогих россиян. И с таким а…
❤7😁5👍3🤡1🤪1
А если все-таки решите облучаться, наверните наших ядерных новостных шортсов в Века-видео, Рутубе и прочих сетях. Всё забывал призвать подписаться! Это, конечно, не газета (храни ее бг!), но вдруг вы просто соскучились по моему голосу? Если да, так и вбейте — Коммерсантъ.
🔥14❤7👍4😁1
Чуваки, близятся выбора, и облучатели заработали на полную катушку. Я кожей чувствую их вибрацию. Поскольку я так и не накрутил сюда ботов и не впарил рекламу знакомым пиарщицам, палю бесплатную ИСТИНУ. Выключайте всё. Тель-авизор, мобильник, радио, свет на кухне, — всё идёт нахер. У вас уже достаточно информации, чтобы сделать правильный выбор. Потому что правильный выбор — он только ваш. Каким бы ни был. И только…
❤10👍6🔥5🍌4
А теперь посудите. Могучими 17ью голосами против 8ми мы спасли от голодной смерти Петю, женщину на сносях и мальчика с отцом выходного дня. Мы ли не молодцы? Наша госуха — отражение нас. Мы поручили ей беречь Петю в начале нулевых, после ада девяностых. И она надрывается, но бережет. Она никогда не даст Петю в обиду, такова ее суть. Если она наплюет на Петю, мы мигом вышвырнем её вслед за Чубайсом в сторону Тель-Ави…
❤5🔥5👍4
Как быть с Петей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Зря угораешь. Через пять лет будем локти кусать, что не взяли.
👍4🤔1🤡1
🗿 Ипотека на жилье? А может лучше ипотека на машино-место?
🤡5🍌3🤪3
Не без интереса наблюдаю за парагвайской сенатором, люто хайпанувшей на расистско-футбольной теме: Парень (Килианн Мбаппе, нападающий сборной Франции) не научился даже писать, пил кокосовое молоко вместо материнского, а самыми образованными из тех, кого он слышал, были шимпанзе. Наш вратарь должен был показать ему средний палец. Я сама так делаю в Сенате, и ничего не происходит! Отреагировали ФИФА, Макрон, ООН и да…
😁6👍2🍌1
Video message, posted without a caption
🤔1
Чуваки, трустори про «жирик-мобиль». В достославном городе Первике, на первом этаже чахлого хруща смуглые (как я) негодяи (не как я) круглосуточно торговали водкой (всякая бакалея тоже была в ассортименте, но, как водится, видавшая виды). Сопровождалась та торговля обычным для такой торговли ебучим Мордором с воплями и «Сектором газа» (люблю эту группу, кстати). Матушка моего товарища Володи, жившая в том хруще, те…
🔥6❤4😁2
Трёп об электромобилях в контексте топливного кризиса смотрится даже покруче пресловутого «…пусть едят пирожные!» Электромашина — это импортно, дорого и малогабаритно (самый новый дорогущий вольвешник конечно тянет 40 тонн, но идёт на одном заряде только 300-400 км.) Короче, даже не смешно. А вот консолидированное предложение пустить в сектор нефтеперерабтки малых и средних предпринимателей хотя и звучит в наших кра…
🍌3🔥3👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grishaleyba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как быть с Петей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лейба” (@grishaleyba), 160 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grishaleyba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.