Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

АРХИВ grandfather talks about…

@grendfar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644416626
TypeChannel
Username@grendfar
DescriptionWer hat dir die Erlaubnis zum Töten gegeben? ph: https://t.me/ottomoh
Created5 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/grendfar

Growth

697 August 2026 — 69 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:3169no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5169first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 2 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,340
Videos
1,010
Links
144

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1135.5%
❤‍🔥1032.3%
🔥1032.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 18 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2025, 08:13 UTC683 viewsread 10 August 2026

Напоминаю про новый канал!!! Там уже целых два анонса вышло!!!!

14 Jul 2025, 09:30 UTC911 viewsread 10 August 2026

✅ Итак, время что-то менять настало. На этом канале я была с 5 сентября 2023 года. За 2 года моя жизнь перевернулась на 360 градусов. Я безумно благодарна всем кто был и остаётся со мной, время расти дальше и развиваться ещё больше! (звучит как будто я сильно завышаю ожидание и прощаюсь на всегда ахахах) Поэтому, приветствую вас в своём новом, пока что маленьком мирке где вы сможете наблюдать за моим развитием! ⬇️⬇

13 Jul 2025, 20:38 UTC602 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Возрадуйтесь дети мои, завтра открытие нового канала, я уже доделываю шутки и дописываю постик ❤️

❤‍🔥6

11 Jul 2025, 22:59 UTC597 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Не могу не поделиться этим!!! Сегодня ходила на премьеру топ сикрета в кино, мне кажется я так долго ждала этого момента встречи с командой утопии шоу😢 + познакомилась с очень комфортными девчулями + фоточки + настроение и безумно приятная атмосфера в зале

7🔥4

5 Jul 2025, 16:44 UTC494 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Друзья мои, открытие канала чутка затягивается, информирую вас 💋 Пока что у меня возникли проблемки с зубами жесткие (БЕРЕГИТЕ ЗУБЫ ПЖ), провожу лето, отдыхаю, катаюсь, скоро вернусь в ресурс и буду подавать оставшиеся заявки на фесты! Всем добра 🩵

🔥6

2 Jul 2025, 22:09 UTC383 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @nesuraznosVideo

ФОТОС В ЛЕСУ С ФИЛЕЙ БЭКСТЕЙДЖ НА АДЛЕРЕ ФОТО ВИДЕО МЕМЫ АНОНС.

4

2 Jul 2025, 21:49 UTC333 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сегодня прошёл фотосет, будем редачить фотки, я пока создаю новый тгк и делаю офорление Вообщем ждите 💋

❤‍🔥4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @grendfar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,156,691 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АРХИВ grandfather talks about…” (@grendfar), 69 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grendfar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.