Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

привет я Хаос

@gregorychaos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

388subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001879034067
TypeChannel
Username@gregorychaos
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gregorychaos

Growth

387388387.56 Aug 2026, 19:49 — 387 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:17 — 387 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:40 — 388 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:496 Aug 2026, 22:40
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:40388+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:17387no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:49387first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
146.1%
avg views ÷ 388 subscribers
Avg views / post
567
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (22 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,267
Reactions total411
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,100 reactions across 11 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537766313896972191126123.7%
custom 526247788423208507023020.9%
❤‍🔥17616.0%
16214.7%
custom 5262951357131822694938.45%
custom 5411421852499204642595.36%
custom 5262519940551843947232.09%
🔥222.00%
💘201.82%
131.18%
custom 5386319482346054246121.09%
🥰121.09%
💋80.727%
60.545%
custom 537536681323008071010.091%
😨10.091%
🤩10.091%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
102
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gregorychaos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC529 views178 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩Меня можно сказать, убедили сделать этот тренд Поэтому ваша нелегкая судьба, смотреть на тикиток трендики.. Сто лайков и рисую с Панталоне эту милую фигню Я ШУЧУ ЕСЛИ ЧЕ... #Genshin_impact

custom 537766313896972191110635❤‍🔥3122custom 53863194823460542462

29 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC512 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Малышарики продолжаются.. в этот раз по своему забавные вышли ❗️Напоминаю что пост стоял в отложенном и я не увижу ваши коммы (если будете писать), чтобы ответить. 💜Но я обязательно прочитаю и отвечу как появиться интернет

custom 53776631389697219113915🥰12custom 53863194823460542463❤‍🔥2custom 5262477884232085070211

25 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC567 views53 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

♾ ура чибики В последнее время я очень занят.. сейчас нахожусь в нескольких зинах: 🟣ДотоЛоне зин @dottolonezine 🟠Хвост Феи зин @fairytalezine А ещё важный момент🔠 Я уезжаю до первых чисел августа и боюсь что там не будет интернета.. поэтому пожалуйста, не теряйте меня родные 💜 🤩Контент будет, я поставлю на отложенное небольшую порисульку

❤‍🔥29🔥8custom 537766313896972191164💘2custom 526247788423208507021💋1

16 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC659 views104 reactions100 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩Хайпуем кароче типа трендами с тиктока Специально в ночи чтоб никто не увидел и я не позорился Но хорошее тоже в жизни есть, скоро будет полноценка клянусь

custom 537766313896972191155❤‍🔥25🔥14custom 5386319482346054246611😨1custom 53753668132300807101

14 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,330 views122 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не учавствовал..но хочется #PortfolioDay

custom 526247788423208507059custom 526251994055184394723custom 526295135713182269420❤‍🔥8custom 54114218524992046424custom 537766313896972191132💘1

13 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC693 views108 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

👌Ладна кидаю на пять сек, потом под снос, а то я вас замучал уже скетчами Мне ночью рубанули всю связь и сон для слабаков поэтому я чето делал. Все вопросы к людям с щп что убедили выложить это на основу 

47custom 541142185249920464231custom 537766313896972191120💘52custom 52629513571318226942custom 52624778842320850701

12 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC441 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩я напоминаю что не аниматор и тд.. что это все по приколу ВООБЩЕ я просто повторил тренд с э-э-э котиком типа..с тиктока, поэтому в коммы кину версию для тикитока #Genshin_impact А ещё я решил сделать набор с мелкими 🤩(буду потихоньку его обновлять)

custom 537766313896972191130custom 541142185249920464217❤‍🔥1142💘1custom 52624778842320850701

9 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC515 views102 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Он расстроен, я расстроен, все расстроены Не считайте это за полноценку, я просто психанул что не выходила идея, поэтому случайно появился малой #Genshin_impact

custom 526247788423208507056❤‍🔥2212💋5custom 52629513571318226942custom 5411421852499204642211

4 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC664 views106 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Пока рисовал основную задумку, решил отвлечься чето миленькое начирикать Я пока не знаю нравится оно мне или нет, поэтому если вдруг исчезнет, то это дебильность взяла верх и я все-таки удалил... А И ПОКА НЕ ЗАБЫЛ... если у кого-то есть возможность, то было бы очень вкусно, если бы вы вкинули голоса за канал, а то боюсь скоро реактикити смешнявые сгинут🙏💜 https://t.me/boost/gregorychaos

custom 526295135713182269452❤‍🔥26custom 526247788423208507017💘6211💋1

29 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,440 views118 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

♾ Мне очень понравился этот тренд с тиктока, поэтому я постарался сделать его Пошучу что бюджета на анимацию тех же волос не хватило. НУ ЭТО ДЕЙСТВИТЕЛЬНО ОЧЕНЬ ЗАТРАТНО ПО ВРЕМЕНИ.. #Genshin_impact

custom 52624778842320850706525custom 526295135713182269417custom 54114218524992046425❤‍🔥2💘211

22 Jun 2026, 13:42 UTC738 views67 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

♾ Пожелания исполнены Вроде никого не забыл из персонажей что просили в комментариях #Genshin_impact

custom 526247788423208507027❤‍🔥2015💘2custom 537766313896972191121

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @gregorychaos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 257,807 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“привет я Хаос” (@gregorychaos), 388 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gregorychaos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.