Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌱 ≛ green world

@greenworldlife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001401067114
TypeChannel
Username@greenworldlife
Descriptionδ just some recommend things to make your pkp or pdpr fun ! — @greendboard δ 19.06.21 cc : pinterest
CreatedBetween 1 August 2018 and 27 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/greenworldlife

Growth

427 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:1542no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:3842first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 October 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
249
Videos
31
Links
151

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍360.0%
240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2021 to 26 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Mar 2022, 07:35 UTC481 viewsread 10 August 2026

" kenapa akan ada orang kutuk kita ?" kalau semua orang puji , kita akan bangga diri . sebab tu allah hantar orang macam tu supaya kita tak lupa diri . ── ꕀ ── ꕀ ── ꕀ ── 🎀 ꒰ @luvcaffe ꒱ 𖥧 ˖࣪ ⋆

16 Feb 2022, 05:54 UTC583 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Boleh tolong isikan yg ni sekali? https://forms.gle/eF7GCucSA5cNPbd89 <3

👍1

16 Feb 2022, 02:46 UTC475 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Hello, morning <3 Sesiapa yang free tu boleh tolong isi form ni sekejap? https://forms.gle/6JbdsBbh9SVpgREy7 🤍

1👍1

28 Jan 2022, 13:22 UTC446 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @claudyschtVideo

𝓦elcoming you... 𝐇oney𝐒tqrs 𝐂laim 🍯✨ ( official merch / yangdo service ) ────♡─────────── [ 𝐁riefing ] • MY based • take note yang pc still preorder and not in hand, please be patient • please make sure that you are 100% sure nak claim pc tu before chat • no cancel after place order • fast payment juseyoo ㅠㅠ • inform me if you changed your telegram username • feel free to request ! ❤ ──────────♡───── [ 𝐏ayment

1

12 Jan 2022, 05:45 UTC379 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @greendboardPoll

Poll <33 your telegram?

  1. Android90%
  2. IOS11%
  3. Desktop17%
  4. Tele X6%
  5. Mac // i tak igt tapi adalah lagi satu tu3%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @greenworldlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jan 2022, 05:45 UTCAnonymous Poll222 voters

Poll <33 your telegram?

  1. Android90%
  2. IOS11%
  3. Desktop17%
  4. Tele X6%
  5. Mac // i tak igt tapi adalah lagi satu tu3%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Dec 2021, 09:52 UTCAnonymous Poll185 voters

Poll ꗃ rate your 2021

  1. 😻 1/109%
  2. 😻😻 2/103%
  3. 😻😻😻 3/104%
  4. 😻😻😻😻 4/106%
  5. 😻😻😻😻😻 5/1019%
  6. 😻😻😻😻😻😻 6/106%
  7. 😻😻😻😻😻😻😻 7/109%
  8. 😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻 8/109%
  9. 😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻 9/105%
  10. 😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻😻 10/1031%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2021 to 26 March 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 733,174 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌱 ≛ green world” (@greenworldlife), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greenworldlife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.