Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Great's NFT

@greatsNFT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

138subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003061399502
TypeChannel
Username@greatsNFT
DescriptionЧат — https://t.me/+I2l7FgllCypkZTgy Продаю звёзды ⭐, отзывы: https://t.me/+CulfG9gbTRVmYjAy Выдача призов — https://t.me/+d3_21MxyvcQ5NjIy owner: @greatalk
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/greatsNFT

Growth

138139138.57 Aug 2026, 17:10 — 139 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:26 — 138 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:01 — 138 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:108 Aug 2026, 23:01
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:01138no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:26138-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:10139first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 25 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
384
Videos
37
Links
42

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5467470793459916154630.0%
🔥525.0%
420.0%
💩315.0%
custom 546752009538950576115.00%
🤔15.00%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 19 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Dec 2025, 21:38 UTC361 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gift_Alerts

🎁 A new gift has been added. Price: 50 ⭐️ Limit: ∞

custom 54674707934599161545🔥2💩1🤔1

5 Dec 2025, 21:56 UTC449 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gift_Alerts

🎁 A new auction for the UFC Mystery Box will start on Dec 7, 21:00 GMT+3. Released by: @ufc Start Bid: 250 ⭐️ Limit: 60,000 Rounds: 120 (500 per round)

💩2🔥2

1 Dec 2025, 15:54 UTC512 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А вы уже помогли санте? 😄 Кошелёк в Telegram стал партнёром новогодней игры Gift Fest с механикой merge (скрещивание). Как играть Копите энергию выполняя простые задания и получайте подарки, которые можно скрещивать для получения новых подарков, которые можно скрещивать.... и так далее🍔 Что обещают игрокам? ▶️ Общий призовой фонд 35 млн. рублей 😥 ▶️ Более 100 000 подарков, включая: iPhone, AirPods, Telegram-подар

29 Nov 2025, 18:12 UTC325 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забрали 📆

2🔥1custom 54674707934599161541

29 Nov 2025, 17:02 UTC213 viewsread 8 August 2026

😥 Закончим подбор финалистов в 21:00 по МСК Набрано: 4/5

29 Nov 2025, 16:35 UTC206 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рулетка на НФТ ❤️ Играем с финалистами, первые ☑️ человек, выбившие 7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ попадут в финал, где уже Бесплатно поборются за нфт 😎 Начальная крутка в финал - 1⭐️ Удачи всем ☺️

29 Nov 2025, 09:38 UTC192 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Доброго утра 😘 После небольшого отдыха готовим розыгрыш на нфт 🎨

2custom 54675200953895057611

27 Nov 2025, 11:46 UTC221 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍔 В продолжении вчерашней перепалки Конора и Хабиба: подключился @dope (который привёл в подарки Снупи) и дал свой комментарий: Мне посчастливилось работать с Telegram и Хабибом над коллекционными подарочными папахами. Хочу уточнить, что Павел не удалял ни твитов, ни постов. Поскольку люди продолжали спрашивать о покупке после окончания аукциона, я посоветовал Хабибу удалить старые посты и обновить их , чтобы у всех

26 Nov 2025, 18:11 UTC182 viewsread 8 August 2026

Добрый вечер 😘 У кого лучше всего идут дела заберет Мишку 😱

26 Nov 2025, 16:33 UTC190 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☹️ Твиттерские войны: начало (или иксовые, как вам удобно) Хабиб сегодня навёл суету из-за своей папахи 🎁 и компанию ему составляет никто иной, как сам Конор Макгрегор, хронология: ▶️ Сначала Хабиб удаляет свои посты в X про выпущенные подарки ▶️ Потом Конор Макгрегор написал про неуважение к отцу Хабиба и к его фанатам и вообще, к культуре Дагестана (скрин 2) ▶️ Затем Хабиб вернул свои посты про подарки и след

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @greatsNFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Great's NFT” (@greatsNFT), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greatsNFT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.