23 May 2023, 14:29 UTC218 viewsread 12 August 2026
Address: https://t.co/zrhrQBGGvc — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 10:45PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
Channel
GRC 각종 알림모음
@grcpeckshield
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001816968609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grcpeckshield |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 21 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grcpeckshield |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 13 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- ≈2,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
23 May 2023, 14:29 UTC203 viewsread 12 August 2026
The whale (maybe @MakerDAO) may have seen this tweet and bought 446 $MKR with 153 $ETH ($283K) 1 hour ago.He has been buying $MKR since Sept 6, 2021, and has never sold $MKR.And bought a total of 36,989 $MKR($34.5M) at an average price of $933.https://t.co/peOmruQeD3 https://t.co/divUwyh4xL — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 10:43PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 11:28 UTC99 viewsread 12 August 2026
Pay attention to the price changes of $MKR.Justin Sun deposited 6,801 $MKR ($4.3M) into #Binance 1 hr ago.https://t.co/FuPGigqgx7 https://t.co/sMQKY6Q8fO — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 08:15PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 10:27 UTC80 viewsread 12 August 2026
Address: https://t.co/fuNdBvqjSt — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 07:00PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 10:27 UTC72 viewsread 12 August 2026
Let's check another top buyer of $PSYOP.0x4426 spent 234.4 $ETH ($425,580) to buy 295M $PSYOP at an average buying price of $0.001443.He traded $BEN 3 times before, and lost money each time, with a total loss of 17 $ETH ($32,110).Will @eth_ben let him make money this time? https://t.co/cAr97LNXR1 — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 07:00PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 10:27 UTC45 viewsread 12 August 2026
The increase in $PSYOP price has a lot to do with cryptopolitan.eth.cryptopolitan.eth spent 233 $ETH ($428,616) to buy 251.8M $PSYOP in the past 13 hours, with an average buying price of $0.001702.And became the 7th holder of $PSYOP.https://t.co/jruGXnWeYX https://t.co/ahaZlLSGYb — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 06:24PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 08:28 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026
5/ Follow this address to see what #MEME coins he will buy next time, and focus on the #MEME coins he spent a lot of money to buy.At the same time, observe when he sells and stop loss.Join our telegram group to receive alpha information.https://t.co/BslhSwNjdN — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 04:32PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 08:28 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026
4/ Comparing the buying cost, we can find that this SmartMoney is very good at finding potential tokens and investing heavily.For example, he spent 45 $ETH ($81.5K) to buy 74.5B $RFD and sold 71.3B $RFD for 234.5 $ETH ($427K), with a realized profit of 189.5 $ETH($345K). https://t.co/n3BqsU3Zee — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 04:32PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 08:28 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026
3/ Here are the top 20 money-losing tokens.This guy is very good at stopping losses, at most he lost 6 $ETH ($11,306) on $RIBBIT. https://t.co/VyqMd5Zpj1 — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 04:32PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 08:28 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
2/ The super #MEME coin hunter traded a total of 104 tokens in the past month, of which 66 tokens were profitable, with a winning rate of 63.5%.https://t.co/QRyjHR2iRw — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 04:32PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 08:28 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026
1/ Sharing a super #MEME coin hunter who earned 562.64 $ETH($1.06M) in the past month!- Made 189.5 $ETH ($345,306, 4x gains) on $RFD.- Made 127 $ETH($248,697, 32x gains) on $PEPE.If you always lose money on #MEME coins, this thread will help you increase the win rate. 🧵 https://t.co/pKObcAQ4lb — Lookonchain (@lookonchain) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 04:32PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/lookonchain
23 May 2023, 07:56 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
#PeckShieldAlert We have detected a series of #rugpulls involving the creation of ~24 Scam #MEME Tokens within the last 10 days. #SHITMEME, #BENS, #WorldCoin, #MONKEYS, #ERDR, #Magneto, #STARK, #ZAT, #LADYBOY, #USACOIN, #WLD, #POGO, #Miniclip, #PORN, #FROGS, #RNDT, #PSYOP,… https://t.co/ZJP3Zx4Kdh https://t.co/KlBX5k9Go6 — PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert) May 23, 2023 May 23, 2023 at 04:45PM via Twitter https://tw…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grcpeckshield. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@grcpeckshield named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@exnetworkcap
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@makerdao
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GRC 각종 알림모음” (@grcpeckshield), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grcpeckshield.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.