Channel
@grazdsvoboda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
919subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001403310587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grazdsvoboda |
| Created | 30 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grazdsvoboda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 919 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 922 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 922 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
242 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 61 | 25.2% | |
| 💔 | 38 | 15.7% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 11.2% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 9.50% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 7.85% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 7.44% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 7.02% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 3.72% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 3.31% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 2.48% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 2.07% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2024 to 8 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Путин, случайно получив огромную власть в свои руки, распорядился ею с катастрофическими для России последствиями. И я не люблю его, потому что он не любит людей. Он не переносит нас. Он презирает нас. Он считает, что мы - средство для него, и только. Средство достижения своих личных властных целей. И поэтому с нами можно все играть, как ему вздумается. Что нас можно уничтожать, как заблагорассудится. Что мы никто. …
💔38👍5❤2
Также мы ведем набор в редакцию. Нам нужны: 1) Редакторы; 2) Копирайтеры; 3) Дизайнеры. Пишите в наш бот с примерами ваших работ: @grsvfeedback_bot
👍5
Гражданская свобода pinned «Поэтический конкурс 🪶 Друзья и подписчики, мы решили провести поэтический конкурс посвященный Алексею Навальному и другим гражданам, убитых режимом. 🌷 Стихи Леонида Каганова, прочитанные Васей Обломовым, произвели настолько сильный эффект, что оригинальный…»
Поэтический конкурс 🪶 Друзья и подписчики, мы решили провести поэтический конкурс посвященный Алексею Навальному и другим гражданам, убитых режимом. 🌷 Стихи Леонида Каганова, прочитанные Васей Обломовым, произвели настолько сильный эффект, что оригинальный ролик заблокировали на русскоязычном ютубе. Строки из этого шедевра наверняка разойдутся на цитаты. Примерно два года назад мы уже проводили поэтический конкур…
Государство не просто так пытается безуспешно бороться с криптовалютой, потлму что оно видит в них угрозу из-за того, что она позволяет обходить государственный контроль за деньгами. В частности, существует валюта Monero, допускаем, что в ближайшем будущем правительство может попытаться запретить эту валюту, однако технически сделать будет сложно. Банки не являются эффективными местами для сохранения средств. Госуда…
👍10❤3
Фильм «Чиполлино», 1973 год. Узнаёте реальность?
❤10
Трамп или Харрис?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4
Но она уже сегодня началась. Белорусскому дикатору лукашенко в этом году исполняется 70 лет.
😁17
Иван Ильин. Весной этого года происходил спор вокруг фашистского философа Ивана Ильина. Что же представлял этот философ? Какими были его политические взгляды? Читайте в нашей статье.
👏3
Блеск и нищета либералов Или как ватник опустил Артура Смолянинова. 😬 Давненько не трогали нашу либеральную, богемную оппозицию. Очень героическую в соцсетях и на всяких интервью. Такие любят называть россиян быдлом и рабами, наускивать на радикальные акции, гражданскую войну, идти брать кремли штурмом, не бояться садиться в тюрьму и так далее. Но сами при этом остающиеся трусливым сыклом даже в эмиграции. Посмотр…
🤯6🤡4👎2
Затишье после бури Прошло уже два с половиной года с начала СВО, и вслед за всплеском активности, некого пика эмоция и ожиданий, у многих наступил период усталости и апатии. Что должно было случиться неизбежно при переходе военных действий в затяжную фазу. Человек не может постоянно находиться в напряжении, и дело тут не в отсутствии у него совести или принципов, что, мол, он, подлец, привыкает к ужасам и уже не в…
👍8❤3🤝2
🔖 Есть расследования ФБК. А это – расследование про ФБК Мы публично задаем вопросы его руководству, так как иным способом не смогли получить ответы. А факты, очевидно, их требуют. 🟣Факт первый В своих финансовых схемах в США и Европе ФБК использует фирму-прокладку, связь с которой пытается скрыть. Фонд получает средства в США, отправляет их в Литву на НКО Posterum, а уже оно перечисляет большую часть полученных де…
🤔7👍3🕊3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grazdsvoboda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Трамп или Харрис?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2024 to 8 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 955,192 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@grazdsvoboda named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гражданская свобода” (@grazdsvoboda), 919 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grazdsvoboda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.