[ WinSSHound ] Windows SSH Misconfiguration Discovery Tool - Map lateral movement paths through misconfigured SSH services in Active Directory environments https://github.com/1r0BIT/WinSSHound

Channel
Gravity's Rainbow
@gravity_rainbow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
34subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003323918562 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gravity_rainbow |
| Created | 6 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gravity_rainbow |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 34 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 33 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 33 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 7.69%
- 1 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 77.0
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 68.0
- over 11 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 14 May 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Nowadays, I tend to post less, not more. Mostly, due to recent events in Cybersecurity and all the technical world. However, if there is only one post that you need to read choosing across all 999 AI hot takes and marketing bullshit, read this: Technical report released: The AI-Assisted Breach of Mexico’s Government Infrastructure https://gambit.security/blog-post/a-single-operator-two-ai-platforms-nine-government…
[ New Mouse in the House: Zero-Point Security Training Joins the Fortra Family ] (an Advanced Cobalt Strike Certified operator course will go deeper on adversary simulation with Cobalt Strike, building on the foundation we established with the initial collaboration) https://www.cobaltstrike.com/blog/new-mouse-in-the-house-zero-point-security-training-joins-the-fortra-family
#htb #cert [ HTB Certified Offensive AI Expert - HTB COAE ] You will work through hands-on labs that focus on how attackers actually target AI environments: adversarial ML, data poisoning, evasion attacks, LLM output exploitation, and AI privacy breaches. No theoretical simulations here; you will be performing professional-grade assessments on realistic infrastructure. Meet the new HTB certificate: https://academy…
#network #ad [ Active Directory Attack Architecture Map v1.1 ] Contains: - Active Directory Basics for Beginners - Attack Flow Chains - Kerberos Fundamentals - NTLM Authentication Basics - Credential Dumping Deep Dive ... and more! https://kypvas.github.io/ad_attack_architecture
👍1
#web #jwt [ Keys to JWT Assessments - From a Cheat Sheet to a Deep Dive ] JWTs power modern authentication, but missteps are common. In TrustedSec blog, Aaron James shares a practical guide to assessing JSON Web Tokens, highlighting common weaknesses, testing techniques, and tools every security practitioner should know. Read it now! https://trustedsec.com/blog/keys-to-jwt-assessments-from-a-cheat-sheet-to-a-deep-…
👍1
#htb #cert [ HTB Certified Wi-Fi Pentesting Expert - HTB CWPE ] Wireless is everywhere, and it’s still one of the most direct ways onto a corporate network when it’s misconfigured or poorly tested. Meet the new HTB certificate, details here: https://academy.hackthebox.com/news/the-new-htb-certified-wi-fi-pentesting-expert-htb-cwpe-is-finally-here
❤1
#network #nmap #nse [ Nmap Scripting Engine (NSE) - useful scripts collection ] The Nmap Scripting Engine (NSE) is one of Nmap's most powerful and flexible features. It allows users to write (and share) simple scripts (using the Lua programming language ) to automate a wide variety of networking tasks. We collected some of useful (and mostly unknown or not popular) scripts in one post (that will be regularly updat…
#education #course [ Red Team Leaders courses and certifications ] Catalog of multiple Offensive Security courses which includes but not limited to: - AV/EDR - Coding - Active Directory - Source Code Review - Web Hacking - Bug Bounty https://courses.redteamleaders.com/catalog Most of them are free or "Pay what you can" model. (this is not a paid promotion, just something we saw and decided to share with you)
#web #js [ Testing JavaScript files for bug bounty hunters ] 🔁 It's safe to claim that JavaScript file enumeration is and will always play a crucial role in bug bounty! In this comprehensive article, Intigrity cover how to find hidden API endpoints, hard-coded credentials, and DOM-based vulnerabilities buried in JavaScript files. They also include recommended tools and techniques to help you discover more issues! …
#web #burp #tool #tricks [ Burp 101 ] Let's start our journey by introducing some of Burp Suite tips and tricks. Most people are smart but this info still can be valuable for others. 1) Need to send requests only to related domain? (^|^[^:]+:\/\/|[^\.]+\.)domain.* 2) Need to use HTTP/2 protocol? Burp → Settings → Network → HTTP (you can also change it in Inspector for specific request) 3) Need to add custom head…
Welcome. This is our first post. Someday it will be edited to include more detailed information but for now everything you need to know is: we will actively post everything related to Cybersecurity. News, tools, attack & defense, jobs (EU/UA/PL mostly) and so on. Our idea is simple: no bullshit, no fluff, no AI. We want to provide value for you and we will do our best to do so. Contact @tslothrop for any questions…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @gravity_rainbow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 307,325 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@gravity_rainbow named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gravity's Rainbow” (@gravity_rainbow), 34 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gravity_rainbow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.