Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gravity Falls ENG

@gravity_falls_eng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,083subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424347630
TypeChannel
Username@gravity_falls_eng
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gravity_falls_eng

Growth

2,0822,0852,083.56 August 2026 — 2,082 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,082 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,085 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,083 subscribers2,0836 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,082–2,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:442,083-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:582,085+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:102,082no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:022,082first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 42s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

346 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18754.0%
👍7020.2%
🔥246.94%
226.36%
🆒144.05%
❤‍🔥102.89%
🌚61.73%
💋51.45%
🍓41.16%
🏆20.578%
💘20.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2024 to 14 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 May 2025, 08:48 UTC≈5,810 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Blubs: I hate to do this, but Quentin Trembley's a matter of national security. Durland: Yeah! Ye--ah... woo. I think I might be colorblind now. Dipper: What do you mean, "national security?" Mabel: And who is Quentin Trembley, anyway? Blubs: See for yourself. Mabel: Aww, it's black and white?! Dipper: Shh! Mabel.

22💋5

12 May 2025, 06:00 UTC≈5,420 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Mabel: Oh, man! Ben Franklin secretly was a woman! Dipper: Hey, jackpot! Now we'll find out who the real town founder was. "Let it be here recorded that Nathaniel Northwest, fabled founder of Gravity Falls, was, in fact, a fraud...as well as a waste-shoveling village idiot"? Oh, bad news for Pacifica. Wait'll the papers hear about this! Mabel: Once people see that I uncovered a historical conspiracy, they can never c

🔥13🍓4

11 May 2025, 06:03 UTC≈4,810 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Dipper: Ah... The statue must be pointing to the next clue. Mabel: Oh, gross! She's picking my nose! Ha ha! Ach. Dipper: Mabel, look! Mabel: Ha! Who's silly now, Pacifica? Bam! Ahh! Ow. Ow. Ow. Okay. Now we're getting into real conspiracy mode. I feel so serious. Mmm. Dipper: Okay, look out for booby traps. Mabel: Ha! Booby traps. Dipper: Tranquilizer darts! Mabel: Aah! It's a treasure trove of historic-y, secret-y t

👍12🌚6

10 May 2025, 06:02 UTC≈4,250 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Woodpecker guy: For the last time, we are not going south for the winter! Our home is here. You always say that! Stan: C'mon! C'mon, ugh! Pacifica: Well, if it isn't Mabel's uncle, Mr. Pines. Looking for this? Stan: Yeah, yeah. What d' ya want, money? Pacifica: I want you to say that the Northwest family is the best family in Gravity Falls. Stan: Oh sure, you want that in writing? There you go. Ha! I did that with m

👍199

21 Dec 2024, 15:14 UTC≈4,690 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Sue: I'm sorry, but we're all out of pink balloons. Durland: Why did we even come? Dispatcher: Officer Blubs. Blubs: Blubs here. Dispatcher: Have the targets been apprehended? Blubs: Negative, but we're close. I promise, those kids'll never get past us. Blubs: Hey! Wait! Blubs and Durland chase the kids out of the museum, but get stuck in the door. Blubs: Dang it!

🆒14🔥4

3 Dec 2024, 08:01 UTC≈4,000 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Sue: ...And those are your free Pioneer Day passes, and your balloons, blue and pink. Dipper: We're in. Mabel: What are we gonna do next, steal Thomas Jefferson's rib cage? Dipper: Ewww, no. According to the map, the next clue about the real town founder should be right... here! A triangular exhibition piece is mounted on the wall. Dipper: We've gotta figure this one out quick, I have a feeling those cops weren't at

10👍4

29 Nov 2024, 13:21 UTC≈3,230 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Blubs: We're on the lookout for two kids who might be reading. Durland: We're hunting 'em down for secret reasons!WHOO! Durland: DERP! Dipper: Maybe we should take this elsewhere... Mabel: This map should lead us to ...The Gravity Falls Museum of History. Dipper: You realize what this means, Mabel. We're gonna have to break in.

11👍5

21 Nov 2024, 07:31 UTC≈3,160 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

McGucket: Back in the olden days, pioneers drew subsistence from telling stories 'round the fire. So let's eat some books, children! Go ahead, eat the books! Dipper: Alright, Mabel, if we can prove that Nathaniel Northwest wasn't the real founder of Gravity Falls, it'll finally put Pacifica in her place. Mabel: And solving a mystery will prove that I'm not silly. I'm serious. Seeeeriousss... Dipper: We just need to c

15👍1

10 Nov 2024, 14:43 UTC≈2,870 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Code sepia" is a fictional code created for storytelling purposes. The term "sepia" is used here symbolically to evoke a sense of something old or hidden, as sepia tones are often associated with old photographs and hidden memories. It adds to the mystery and intensity of the operation in which Blubs and Durland are involved. Eavesdrop (on somebody/something) means to listen secretly to what other people are saying

16👍1

Signed Kiko the Rabbit Ⓜ️ MEMES

7 Nov 2024, 15:12 UTC≈2,690 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Blubs: This is Sheriff Blubs. We've got a code sepia! Dispatcher: (Spits out coffee) What?! And what are you doing about it? Blubs: I'm following them right now. Dispatcher: Find them and stop them. There's no room for error. Blubs: I understand. Blubs out. (To Durland:) Deputy Durland, maintaining this cover-up is the mission we've been training for our entire careers. Are you ready? Durland: Whoo! Blubs: Hehe, if b

10🔥7

Signed Kiko the Rabbit

25 Oct 2024, 09:24 UTC≈2,580 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Dipper: Wait a minute! I feel like I read something about Pacifica's great-great grandfather before. Of course! Oh, this is perfect. "In my investigations..." Should- should I do the voice? Mabel: Nuh-uh. Dipper: I'll just read... normal. "In my investigations I recently made a discovery. Nathaniel Northwest may not be the founder of Gravity Falls! I believe this secret is emburied somewhere on the enclosed document.

👍135

Signed Kiko the Rabbit

23 Oct 2024, 11:01 UTC≈2,320 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The phrase "to take someone down a peg" is historically related to ships. It originally comes from the practice of raising and lowering flags on sailing ships. Ships would raise their flags to indicate their status or to show respect. Flags were raised on pegs (or "halyards") at different heights on the mast, with higher positions symbolizing greater honor or authority. When someone "takes a peg down," it means that

8👍1

Signed Kiko the Rabbit

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gravity_falls_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 929,683 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gravity Falls ENG” (@gravity_falls_eng), 2,083 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gravity_falls_eng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.