Channel
@graphics_design_123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
657subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003298742461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @graphics_design_123 |
| Created | 6 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/graphics_design_123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 657 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 642 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 640 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
17 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 82.4% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 17.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Visual Design Tip (Glassmorphism 2.0) Focus: Visual look and feel. Headline: Glassmorphism is back, but better! ✨ In 2026, "Frosted Glass" is now Dynamic Glass. The Trick: Don't just add blur. Add a subtle Animated Mesh Gradient behind the glass. Why: It makes the UI feel "alive" and premium.
❤4👍3
🍄Ultimate UX Resources List (Websites, Books, Newsletters, Courses & Tools)🍄
30 Best UX Design Blogs to Educate and Inspire You https://share.google/jK8OSmxByb2IezW0C
❤2
Why does the iPhone offer two different ways to answer a call? A UX Perspective: When your iPhone is locked, you get a slide to answer option. When your iPhone is unlocked, you see Accept and Decline buttons. It’s not random - it’s smart UX. 🔍 When the phone is locked, a simple tap could accidentally answer a call (think about it bumping in your pocket). Sliding requires a deliberate, intentional action. 🔍 When t…
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🎨 UI/UX Tip of the Day Minimal ≠ Simple 🚫✅ Just because a design is minimal, doesn’t mean it is simple to use. ⚠️ Too minimal = missing important options → users get confused. ✅ Balanced simplicity = clean design + clear usability. #UI #UX #UIDesign #UXTips #DesignInspiration #ProductDesign 👉 Question: Do you prefer *Minimal but functional* OR *Detailed with more options*?
❤1
Channel name was changed to «Graphics design || ui ux || video editing || illustration || Adobe Photoshop || Adobe premiere Pro»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @graphics_design_123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 326,048 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Graphics design || ui ux || video editing || illustration || Adobe Photoshop || Adobe premiere Pro” (@graphics_design_123), 657 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/graphics_design_123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.