Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Graphball

@graphball

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

740subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735375261
TypeChannel
Username@graphball
DescriptionВизуально (и не только) о футболе По любым вопросам – @afullsize
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/graphball

Growth

7407 Aug 2026, 08:20 — 740 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:33 — 740 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:207 Aug 2026, 08:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 739–741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 08:33740no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:20740first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
182.3%
avg views ÷ 740 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held17 (12 June 202628 July 2026)
Views total5,395
Reactions total187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,220
Videos
3
Links
75

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

491 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁15531.6%
🔥14228.9%
👍7014.3%
5611.4%
🤡183.67%
🤔142.85%
🤯142.85%
🍓91.83%
👎61.22%
💩40.815%
😢30.611%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,980 views122 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

— Кто это такой? — Зачем мы вообще его рекламируем? Я продолжаю поражаться типочкам, которые ведут трансляции на 59 тысяч просмотров и думают, что рекламируют Илюху. Вы сидите на ютубе (открыл Мэд) и стримите (открыл Мэд) — вы на кого поперли вообще? Это вы кто такие? К Геничу вопросов нет: вспомнил наконец-то, на чьих обзорах вырос.

😁92👍242🔥2🤡2

20 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,860 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хотел написать что-то лаконичное и точное про ЧМ и его финал. Но как-то не вышло, дальше ноль аналитики и экспертизы — только чувства. Я начал смотреть футбол хоть как-то осознанно где-то с 2003 года. И даже тогда была проблема: ловило 3-4 канала, часовой пояс — плюс 6 от московского. Поймать хоть какой-то матч — событие. Большую часть информации я получал от папы и из редких газет и журналов. И вот меня плюс-минус

14👍7😢3

16 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,090 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тухель стал главным виноватым в поражении Англии — это интересно. Я понимаю, что рисунок игры и конечный результат прямо подсказывают, что Томас не справился. Но предлагаю все-таки вернуться на 60-ю минуту матча. Сборная Англии отпахала первый тайм в прессинге и вынуждала аргентинцев втроем отбирать мяч у Джеда Спенса (да еще и радоваться, когда это получалось). Да, до ударов так и не дошло, но правый фланг защиты

👍6🤔6🤡3👎2💩2🔥21

11 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC661 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, предлагаю срочно помочь Константину Геничу вспомнить Илюху Мэда, часовое видео которого он смотрел всего 10 месяцев назад. https://t.me/kgenich/6333 Ну и кичиться тем, что якобы не знаешь человека, который всем свет в будку провел — это, конечно, сильно.

😁11🔥5

10 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC569 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нид фор спид и Тимба. Ну, или как там их... Удивительно, конечно, что Генич требует титры к кадрам со знаменитостями на стадионе, когда чаще нужны субтитры к его же репортажу.

🔥17

8 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC769 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лучшие и худшие вратари на ЧМ-26 по предотвращенным голам.

🔥2🤔2

8 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC598 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С прошлого ЧМ до сих пор никто из игроков не смог заполнить нишу.

🔥71

7 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC978 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Честно говоря, я рассчитывал, что на матче Колумбии и Швейцарии смогу отдохнуть от перефорса отмены красной карточки Балогуну, но товарищ Кытманов решил по-другому. Что ж, давайте и тут разберемся. Может сложиться впечатление, что я адвокат на контракте у ФИФА или целых США — увы, нет. Поэтому сразу отмечу, что решение об отмене — дичь. Но не из-за Трампа. Хронология. Спортивный журналист Бен Джейкобс, ссылаясь на

👍7👎32🔥2

2 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC484 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И раз уж про футбол сегодня что-то из себя выдавил, то, пожалуй, можно и пост про комментаторов для баланса. Константин Генич вчера, когда показали Мбемба и Кейна, выдал: «Два капитана, как у Гранта». И я все понимаю: прямой эфир, заговорился, перепутал. Но через паузу он добавил: «Дети капитана Гранта, помните?». Вместо того, чтобы просто исправиться или отпустить эту оговорку, Генич решил все-таки пояснить: он ск

😁14

2 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC561 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пару раз за сезон стабильно думаю о Марко Арнаутовиче. Представьте себе на миг: если бы он взялся за голову, как мы схватились бы за свои?

🤯9

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @graphball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Graphball” (@graphball), 740 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/graphball.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.