Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐉. 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫.

@grangerherm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003015080524
TypeChannel
Username@grangerherm
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 10 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/grangerherm

Growth

669 Aug 2026, 23:45 — 66 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:45 — 66 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 23:4510 Aug 2026, 01:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 01:4566no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:4566first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

614 reactions across 17 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.61% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5350317039246404294599.61%
custom 5350829257046124300538.63%
custom 5260605746642449105355.70%
custom 5339500189881229934345.54%
custom 5348190283110575638345.54%
custom 5325606516139508329335.37%
custom 5350824335013603663304.89%
custom 5339298919123807351284.56%
custom 5339560469747230493254.07%
custom 5402242266142097571203.26%
custom 5292068851691848723193.09%
custom 5339030449308074017182.93%
custom 5339097077135738810182.93%
custom 5346268225116065279162.61%
custom 5258098748461972806152.44%
custom 5411633585796959844142.28%
custom 5258161618193249269132.12%
custom 5339281245333384697132.12%
custom 5260457106414272694111.79%
custom 5321043929431293788101.63%
29 further kinds11618.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 11 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
115
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grangerherm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 October 2025 to 11 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Nov 2025, 21:57 UTC≈2,050 views59 reactions18 Starsread 10 August 2026

Конец — это не приговор, а лишь поворот. Истинный финал не бывает мрачным. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 И тьма не есть финал, это лишь занавес перед новым актом. Конца, что плох, не существует. ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ А если боль ещё жива, значит, путь продолжается.

custom 532560651613950832933custom 541163358579695984414custom 532104392943129378810custom 52133867516361630251custom 52809690241114039191

5 Nov 2025, 22:03 UTC≈1,840 views55 reactions33 Starsread 10 August 2026

— самое обидное, что я видел, как ты смотрела на него … видел, любовь моя. - его голос смягчился, в нем появилась нежность, но она была пропитана горечью. — я знаю этот взгляд, ведь раньше ты смотрела так на меня. - эти слова, произнесенные шепотом, ударили ее сильнее любого крика. Он говорил о прошлом, о времени, когда их любовь была чиста и беспримесна, а теперь эта тень другого мужчины, этого случайного прохожего

custom 526060574664244910523custom 525809874846197280615custom 526045710641427269411custom 52581225382858249002custom 52604527899721383952custom 52581616181932492691custom 52605640596898783801

5 Nov 2025, 22:02 UTC929 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— и ты решила, что флиртовать уединенно с ним на той сраной качели позволительно? или ты думала, я не узнаю? твоя подруга меня отвлекала? ты спланировала это? - вопросы сыпались градом, каждое было заряжено ядом, пропитано подозрениями. Его глаза, еще недавно полные дикой ярости, теперь сверкали огнями ревности, искажая реальность, превращая невинную встречу в предательство. — да что ты несешь?! я ни с кем не флирто

custom 526060574664244910512custom 52583328800141807965custom 52606822528948950885

5 Nov 2025, 22:02 UTC844 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026

​​ — почему ты делаешь это? - недовольно, с ноткой обвинения, вырвалось из Гермионы. Она буквально влетела на пассажирское сидение, захлопнув дверь с такой силой, что, казалось, задрожал весь автомобиль. В машине висел тяжелый, удушливый запах сигарет. Он снова курил здесь, с закрытыми окнами, хотя она так откровенно говорила, как сильно ей это не нравится. Каждый вдох давался с трудом, и в груди поднималась волна р

custom 525816161819324926912custom 52581225382858249006custom 52604527899721383955

2 Nov 2025, 02:19 UTC799 views37 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026

официально заявляю, что мне кроме Теодора Нотта - никто не нужен.

custom 534626822511606527916custom 52515173037863263668custom 53640605695213710216custom 53437161856135560602custom 53458078776363806811custom 53458471035726931941custom 53458540399448765121custom 53462378296325125821

31 Oct 2025, 20:58 UTC803 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 529206885169184872319custom 53998400909334450027custom 52990209305702751406custom 53754902462951883652custom 52921035120779277791custom 52985139311558176771custom 54021054413689488571custom 54022422661420975711

31 Oct 2025, 20:58 UTC724 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 540224226614209757119custom 54023779527489137299custom 54021054413689488577

31 Oct 2025, 11:18 UTC654 views32 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 какой ваш любимый ужастик?)

custom 533909707713573881017custom 53390468217234048666custom 53392358647089383444custom 53372980484794273881custom 53390304493080740171custom 53393379346067284731custom 53394367403293743961custom 53394600491168871921

31 Oct 2025, 11:08 UTC700 views35 reactions7 Starsread 10 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 — сладость или гадость? - раздался голос, принадлежащий парню лет двадцати. Он возник будто из ниоткуда, как и положено в Хэллоуин. Гермиона нахмурилась, откладывая обратно на полку упаковку с кричащими монетами. Внутри лавки было пусто, лишь эхо её собственных шагов да шуршание конфетных обёрток. За окном царила кромешная темень, время давно перевалило за восемь вечера, и лишь тусклое свечение волшебны

custom 533903044930807401717custom 53394367403293743966custom 53390468217234048664custom 53372980484794273882custom 53393379346067284732custom 53390970771357388101custom 53392358647089383441custom 53394600491168871921

27 Oct 2025, 08:23 UTC606 views36 reactions9 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

.

custom 533929891912380735118custom 53508292570461243008custom 53392812453333846974custom 53503170392464042942custom 52289112287551450921custom 53395001898812299341custom 53395604697472304931custom 53508243350136036631

25 Oct 2025, 03:22 UTC621 views32 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 535082925704612430017custom 53392989191238073516custom 53481902831105756385custom 53392812453333846971custom 53395001898812299341custom 53395604697472304931custom 53503170392464042941

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grangerherm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 726,556 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐉. 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫.” (@grangerherm), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grangerherm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.