Channel
@granat_press
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
684subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001712265569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @granat_press |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/granat_press |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 684 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 685 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 685 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (4 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,431 |
| Reactions total | 62 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
90 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 86.7% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 10.0% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я тогда был членом русской молодежной организации, и вместе с другими подростками мне пришлось выслушать лекцию одного священника. Он изложил нам то, что Евангелие говорит о Христе, в такой форме, которая вызвала у меня отвращение: сладкий, кроткий Христос, Чьи черты вовсе не привлекали мальчика моих лет — смирение, кротость, терпение... Меня настолько возмутило то, что говорил священник, что я отправился домой, спр…
❤12🔥3🕊2
На сайте «Горький» вышла рецензия Эдуарда Лукоянова на сборник предисловий переводчицы Любови Сумм «Конь мой Фалада» В этой книге под одной обложкой собрались тексты о самых разных авторах: от Мильтона, Свифта и Монтеня до Джейн Остен, Томаса Вулфа, Джорджа Оруэлла и Евгения Шварца. Но что объединяет эти имена, разделенные веками и материками? Рецензент замечает: сквозная нить книги — это «неправильность». Именно и…
❤7
Рекомендация выходного дня: офлайн-встреча о личных дневниках и письменных практиках Ведете ли вы дневник? А любите ли книги дневников? В ближайшую среду, 29 июля, в Покровских воротах приглашаем порассуждать о личных письменных практиках. Модераторами этого разговора станут теолог и психолог Иван Мыздриков и главный редактор «ГРАНАТа» Дмитрий Рындин. Поговорим о дневниках, которые оставили отпечаток в наших серд…
❤9
Автор действительно спокойно и дружелюбно разговаривает с читателем и в итоге благовествует. Благая весть эта такая: и после катастроф возможна жизнь, и жизнь эта имеет смысл. Основную и главную часть этого собрания составляют богословские размышления о церкви, о том, где она (везде, где двое или трое собрались сделать что-то хорошее), о жертве, милости, а также комментарии к отдельным эпизодам и фрагментам Священно…
❤12🔥5
Есть ли среди нас подписчики из Тулы? Лето — время путешествий, душевных встреч и новых знакомств, верно? Поэтому сегодня мы приехали в Тулу— и уже ждем вас в кластере «Октава»! Здесь проходит гаражная распродажа и книжный фестиваль «Фонарь». 📚 План на этот день такой: 💋вы приносите прочитанные книги и отдаете их организаторам фестиваля; 💋эти книги добавляются к сотням других и продаются по сниженным ценам (от 50 …
❤12
План на выходные — новый книжный фестиваль Мы чудесно провели на прошлых выходных встречу с Любовью Сумм на книжном фестивале «Черный рынок» и с нетерпением ждем эти выходные — чтобы увидеться с вами вновь! ☀️ В субботу и воскресенье в Сергиевом Посаде пройдет книжный фестиваль «Игра в буквы»: будет много книг, творческие и кулинарные мастер-классы, лекции, встречи с авторами, игры и отдельные программы для детей. …
❤11👍1
Рекомендация выходного дня: радиоэфир о Георгии Великанове «Не бойтесь любить и отдавать себя Любви даже ценой Креста», — писал Георгий Великанов, погибший, спасая бездомного, который оказался на железнодорожных путях перед приближающимся поездом. Делимся записью эфира на радио «Вера», в котором вдова Гоши Наталья Великанова и его друг, старший научный сотрудник Института мировой литературы РАН Елена Кнорре, вспоми…
❤9🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Встреча с Любовью Сумм переносится в беседку! Маршрут традиционно здесь
❤3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @granat_press. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 317,648 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ГРАНАТ” (@granat_press), 684 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/granat_press.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.