Channel
@gramstein
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
144subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001669881555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gramstein |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gramstein |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 144 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 144 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
206 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 48 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 22.3% | |
| 😁 | 41 | 19.9% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 13.1% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 6.31% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 5.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.91% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.94% | |
| 👨💻 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2024 to 3 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Анонс от коллеги по цеху. То, чего не хватает в @send, и то, что планируется в Touch Wallet. И да, коммуниздить дизайн у КБ у нас семейное Для тех, кто не въехал: Донатный сервис на КБ-шном апи. Как я понял - с лайв обновлением прогресса в публикации (как с курсом в @send). После релиза будет и оплата в TW
🔥7👍4👏2
Signed MyName
Попросил ChatGPT "прожарить" меня. Задумался. Подошёл к окну. Прослезился. Ты как тот человек, который находит баги в чужом коде, но не может починить свою жизнь. Твои попытки быть "организованным" — это как список задач на бумажке, который ты каждый день переносишь в новый блокнот, забывая, где вообще его положил. Тебе как будто специально выдали суперсилу создавать проблемы с минимальными усилиями, но вот решать и…
😁4❤1👨💻1🔥1😢1
Signed MyName
Подойдём к вопросу немного с другой стороны
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed MyName
Кто-нибудь проходил верификацию на Fragment? Как это происходит и какую информацию запрашивают?
Signed MyName
Поставщикам ликвидности в @wTouchBot - заходим в группу бета теста, кого там еще нет - https://t.me/+vYmqRcuVAptiMTQ6 Сегодня ближе к концу дня будет реализована механика создания позиции ликвидности, начисления комиссионных и вывода ликвидности. Нюансы по ходу дела будем обсуждать в группе
🔥4👍3👏2
Signed MyName
Однажды у меня закончился бенз в машине. Заправил своим энтузиазмом и поехал
❤6😁3🔥2
Signed MyName
Уже 32 пользователя добавили меня в контакты, ох уж эта популярность.)
😁6👏2🙈2
Signed MyName
Мультичек на 1500.0 $USDT (1500.67 USD) В каждой активации: 10.0 $USDT (10.0 USD) Активаций: 150 💬 Для моих папищеков
🔥9🥰9👍6
Signed MyName
⭐️ 500 STARS = 1.60178 TON
😁4
Signed MyName
Кстати про калькулятор. Решил я значит посмотреть статистику по уникальным пользователям, и был мягко говоря шокирован - более 3500 человек хотя бы раз им пользовались. А с учетом того, что никакой финансовой или иной выгоды он не несет - могу предположить, что тут нет места накрутке или чего то еще. Приятно :) И да, чисто сарафанка, и один пост в этом канале
❤6👏4
Signed MyName
Photo, posted without a caption
😁12👍3💯2👨💻1
Signed MyName
$TOUCH × The Gateway 2025. Доберёмся
👍9🔥9🤔3❤1
Signed MyName
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gramstein. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Подойдём к вопросу немного с другой стороны
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2024 to 3 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 744,923 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gramstein named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gramstein” (@gramstein), 144 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gramstein.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.