Its about trenches: Tonight we open our fund: https://printerfund.store

Channel
GRAM PRINTER
@gram_printer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003844625101 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gram_printer |
| Description | gramprinter.com This coin Printing GRAM. Just hold this and print your GRAM. Tax 10/10 buy/sell. 70% from tax go to holders rewards, 30% to marketing. Track your rewards and other tools: @Gramprinter_bot X: https://x.com/GRAM_PRINTER |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 8 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gram_printer |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 111 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 111 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 112 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 34
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 07s
- Average length
- 34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
96 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 43 | 44.8% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 27.1% | |
| 🍓 | 20 | 20.8% | |
| 🍾 | 7 | 7.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Gm Printers! Happy weekend! Here is some fresh minds about market trenches. What do you thinks about trenches? If you look to trenches from different sides you can see many good and interesting things. Its a Printer vision.
🔥1
Gm! Have a great Sunday, Printers!🚀
🔥3🐳1
Gm Printers 💎
🐳3
Gm Printers! Market shakeout. But season for printing is here. 💎
🔥5🐳2
Gm Printers! ☕️ 🖨 Today's the day. TON officially becomes GRAM, marking the beginning of a new chapter for the ecosystem. We've been waiting for this moment, printing through every market condition. Now it's time to embrace the GRAM era. Let's print. 💎🚀 EQAbM_QYH3ZesfdPIujD51Ey4XoGy05BuIiBnqr2NdEgOfy9
🔥4
Gm Printers! 1 day before Gram era.💎 1 day before start more printing.
🔥5
Enjoy upcoming weekend! Next week will be bullsh from monday for printing.💎
🐳3
Gm Printers! 💎 Just 3 days left until TON becomes GRAM.🚀 While the countdown continues, we're expanding the printer family with another distribution to top reward token holders. The printer never sleeps. 🖨
🍓5
1 dex updated. ✅ Second coming later too.
🐳7
Posted without readable text
🐳5🍓1
Gm Printers! ☀️ 4 days left until the GRAM era begins. The question is simple: Are you ready to print? 🖨 Just hold. Every day we get some more attention. And prepare for a break to the next leg. 💎
🐳3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gram_printer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 488,354 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GRAM PRINTER” (@gram_printer), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gram_printer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.