Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GRAFT Announcement Channel

Channel

GRAFT Announcement Channel

@graftnetofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

277subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001143577117
TypeChannel
Username@graftnetofficial
CreatedBetween 1 July 2016 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/graftnetofficial

Growth

277278277.57 August 2026 — 278 subscribers8 August 2026 — 278 subscribers24 August 2026 — 277 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 277–278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 21:16277-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:34278no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:16278first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 September 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

25 Nov 2023, 17:25 UTC830 viewsread 8 August 2026

Community seed nodes release is ready. Please upgrade as the current seed nodes will go down in December. https://github.com/graft-project/GraftNetwork/releases/tag/v1.11.0

3 Oct 2023, 02:32 UTC871 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hello. The infrastructure transfer has not happened and is unlikely to happen at this point. The only other option available to us is for the individual community members to host their own seed servers (this is probably better anyways as it further decentralizes the network). From what I understand, the servers just need to run graftnoded process and have a public IP. 2 cores with 4GB RAM should be sufficient. Pl

23 Jul 2023, 15:25 UTC984 viewsread 8 August 2026

By a way of an update, I wanted to let the community know that Chris has generously agreed to take over most of the infrastructure for the Graft network. We'll be transitioning over the upcoming weeks. Big thanks to him as I am unable to keep funding the infrastructure personally after several years of doing so. I also wanted to offer some thoughts on how the project can move forward. Contrary to the opinion that

11 Apr 2023, 21:55 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

How should we proceed

  1. shut GRAFT down34%
  2. keep it dormant66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Apr 2023, 21:54 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hello. It's becoming obvious that we need to make a decision on how to move forward. I've being paying for the seed nodes, a wallet node, and a web server over the past 3 years out of my own pocket while there was some development happening on the project, but at this point given that there's no active development, I wonder if it makes sense to continue. I'm not in a position to be active in the project - too burn

13 Sept 2021, 18:08 UTC≈2,070 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

A pull request was made by community member halfing the block rewards from the current level. https://github.com/avastar/GraftNetwork/commit/74dca62b6cd7a45064ec7aa1e8027e9ed442f2d0 Should the change be adopted?

  1. Yes, halve block rewards71%
  2. No, keep the block rewards as is29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2021, 18:52 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 8 August 2026

Published release binaries (for mainnet), hardfork planned at 2021-08-18 @ 12:00:00 GMT+00 https://github.com/graft-project/GraftNetwork/releases/tag/v1.10.0

3 Aug 2021, 18:33 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 8 August 2026

Public testnet pool server running - 207.148.153.14:81 download miner from graft.rocks. windows and ubuntu builds only xmrig for testing only.

26 Jul 2021, 15:53 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hi all. Looks like there are issues with graft.network domain (configuration or expiration). Looking into it.

25 Jul 2021, 17:18 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 8 August 2026

Update on RandomX: 3 different implementations of RandomX were tested: - RandomX - RandomXL (loki) - RandomXG (Graft tweak) RandomX works with pool and xmrig "out of the box" RandomXL is missing a pool, it has an xmrig implementation, but not an official one RandomXG was tested and has both xmrig and pool commits: https://github.com/graft-project/xmrig/commit/f8f90861f41944548075be5750df748053b776d2 https://github

20 Jul 2021, 05:45 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

RandomXL was deprecated (removed) by miners and pools after Loki went to POS. As such doing RandomXL is same as any other tweak to the algo - it will require submitting changes and coordinating with miner software and pools.

  1. Go with RandomXL40%
  2. Go with another tweak25%
  3. Go with original RandomX (no coordination required)35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Jul 2021, 22:33 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 8 August 2026

A RandomX implementation testnet. Code: https://github.com/graft-project/GraftNetwork/tree/feature/RandomX Binaries: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xDUhErPz9teScUgpSJeR3GqFlrt882gk/view?usp=sharing

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @graftnetofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Apr 2023, 21:55 UTCAnonymous Poll190 voters

How should we proceed

  1. shut GRAFT down34%
  2. keep it dormant66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Sept 2021, 18:08 UTCAnonymous Poll278 voters

A pull request was made by community member halfing the block rewards from the current level. https://github.com/avastar/GraftNetwork/commit/74dca62b6cd7a45064ec7aa1e8027e9ed442f2d0 Should the change be adopted?

  1. Yes, halve block rewards71%
  2. No, keep the block rewards as is29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2021, 05:45 UTCAnonymous Poll108 voters

RandomXL was deprecated (removed) by miners and pools after Loki went to POS. As such doing RandomXL is same as any other tweak to the algo - it will require submitting changes and coordinating with miner software and pools.

  1. Go with RandomXL40%
  2. Go with another tweak25%
  3. Go with original RandomX (no coordination required)35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jun 2021, 17:25 UTCAnonymous Poll260 voters

We're pursuing a change to the POW algo to RandomX per community's request. The RandomX implementation needs to be redone/refreshed due to the underlying version changes since it was first implemented.

  1. Support change to RandomX92%
  2. Don't support change to RandomX8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2020, 14:50 UTCAnonymous Poll152 voters

Getting a read on the community sentiment around continuing SN network stimulus. The goal at the time was to test out the staking and establish a substantial network of SN’s ready to go when RTA is available on mainnet.

  1. continue70%
  2. discontinue30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2020 to 25 November 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GRAFT Announcement Channel” (@graftnetofficial), 277 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/graftnetofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.