🎥 Завтра. 18:00 Мы с Дашей впервые проведем воркшоп, где у вас будет возможность «спроектировать» свое будущее в дизайне и задать нам любые вопросы Встречаемся в прямом эфире, регистрируйтесь, чтобы получить ссылку! Мы подготовили интерактивный формат: вместе с нами в Miro вы соберёте свою личную «Доску дизайнера»📋 Что будет: - определим ваши сильные стороны - выберем ниши, в которых вы хотите работать - разберем…

Channel
GRÁFICO О ДИЗАЙНЕ
@grafico_design
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
783subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002171577256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grafico_design |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grafico_design |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 783 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 782 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 784 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 785 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 51s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 77.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 24 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Мы открываем двери агентства Grafico Привет! Многие учат дизайну в теории, но мало кто показывает, как команда работает на примере реальных проектов. Пришло время раскрыть внутрянку "того самого" ребрендинга ENI Мы начинаем бесплатный интенсив «Brand Designer Starter Pack». И это абсолютно новый материал, который мы еще никогда не давали. Мы пустим вас на «кухню» агентства Grafico. На примере нашего реального к…
❤🔥2
Есть ли доказательства, что понятнее, чем объясняет Даша не объясняет никто?? Точно да🤭 Наши ученики, особенно те, кто приходят после других обучений всегда отмечают, насколько понятны уроки и информация в них — все без лишней воды и с огромным вдохновением! так что вебинар точно пропускать нельзя уже сегодня в 18:00 👉🏻 ссылка на регистрацию
Вчера у нас в Москве прошла встреча с ученицами из группы последнего потока👩🏼💻⌨️ Наш куратор Аня собрала девочек — сходили на выставку, посидели в кафе и просто поговорили. Без формата «урок», без экрана — вживую. Аня задавала вопросы: что изменилось за эти два месяца, что было самым сложным, как сейчас девочки ощущают себя в профессии. И ответы, честно, были очень трогательными💔 К девочкам присоединилась и основа…
❤2🔥1🥰1
уууу скоро будет полный выпуск подкаста с интересным гостем на нашем ют канале!😍 с арт-директором дизайнером одного из самых стильных брендов в сфере велнесс на Российском рынке! реакции, если ждете
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
Хотим поздравить от лица команды gráfico всех девушек с 8 Марта!🌸 мы не перестаем восхищаться талантом, усердием, красотой, подходом женщин к своему развитию и делу, а также тем, каким невероятно красивым путём они идут к поставленным целям желаем ещё больше вдохновения, смелости и любви ко всему, что вас окружает
❤4
Вдохновляющие девушки-предприниматели, для чьих брендов работала команда дизайнеров gráfico🩷 — мы уже больше года активно работаем как дизайн-агентство и продолжаем развиваться в этом направлении рады быть частью таких замечательных проектов для заказа дизайна @graficodes
❤5
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @grafico_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,297,213 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GRÁFICO О ДИЗАЙНЕ” (@grafico_design), 783 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grafico_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.