Представьте, что биток снова по 30к$, я бы взял, ну так чисто на старость, чтобы было...
👍2custom 60530943774529981212

Channel
@goyinthecrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002021079203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goyinthecrypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goyinthecrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 27 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6052931761401237739 | 28 | 38.4% | |
| custom 6060092000164645956 | 16 | 21.9% | |
| custom 6053094377452998121 | 13 | 17.8% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.74% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2024 to 28 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Представьте, что биток снова по 30к$, я бы взял, ну так чисто на старость, чтобы было...
👍2custom 60530943774529981212
Пока я сладко спал, на рынке происходила кровавая бойня. У вас как дела, живые?
custom 60600920001646459567
#SOL идём на 200? А почему бы и да!
🔥4custom 60529317614012377392
Забрал свои два икса на оладушках
custom 60529317614012377394🔥1
Видали, да, как могу?
custom 60529317614012377395
В соавторстве с нищим @Roodikk без депа в need2pay
custom 60529317614012377394
#GOY #27
👍7custom 60530943774529981211
Но я конечно же не смог просто наблюдать за безоткатным ростом всего того, что связано с hyperliquid. Оказывается я уже открывал #PURR по 0.2, но тогда видимо я не поверил во все это, а теперь вот решил запрыгнуть в последний вагон.
Насколько вообще hl можно считать дексом? Фактически мы заводим туда деп и он не хранится у нас на кошельках. В чем тогда заключается децентрализация? В том что мы проводим сделку без посредника? А что если сейчас идет накачка пузыря, заманивая туда всех и вся. А в какой-то момент произойдёт некий пук, что-то вроде обязательного кус и с большой долей вероятности, без возможности прохождения этой верификации для снг п…
custom 60600920001646459563
За последний месяц я трижды пытался продать #TORN за 20$, просто хотел покушать купить, но мне не хватало на комиссию, теперь я миллионер, спасибо ❤️
custom 60529317614012377397
#ETH buy $50, price 3418 Вот она первая покупочка, кстати смело можете вставать в шорт. Обычно это именно так и работает.
custom 60530943774529981214
Это он специально сейчас на хаях, да? Ладно-ладно, подожду маленько...
custom 60600920001646459563
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @goyinthecrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 954,432 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Goy in the crypto” (@goyinthecrypto), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goyinthecrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.